Click image to enlarge
Base gallery. Upperside. Pinned specimen.
Photo, and identified by: Yuri Semejkin. Image without retouching at the website
Time of shooting/catching: 2015-01-20 00:00:00
Photographer's comment: Photo from the entomological collection of BPI FEB RAS.Alexander, I do not argue: the overall trend is very bad, that talk about it .....
Here, if people would not buy bezetiketochny material, then traders would be thinking about how they live on :)
Basil. We are not talking about personalities, but the general trend.
Well then ebay :) That's about it and spores. There's not usually write in the Public Information label for specific reasons. Another thing is when the real stuff, on receipt without labels. In Lehi zhtiketka the fact that he is always a catch.
And now let us enter the ACC ebee your good friend and look at the label, yeah -))
What controversy, citizens?
Well, I, Alexander the material is not from ebay, and from my good friend who goes there to catch himself and simply divided friendly material. And in the summer we with him often lost in Meshchora (collect insects, fungi, etc.). So, for the accuracy of Malaysian label I can vouch skzat head :)
"... Many traders do not comply with these rules" - all traders, Basil. Even on ebey even gathered themselves !!!
Alexander, the data about the place of collection, including the name of the collector is always indicated on the label, so it is accepted in science, and it is necessary for private .What collection fees, there is really the name of the collector for anything, there is only enough sample. Everything else unless they themselves raised under the big question.
Alexander, and anything funny. In accordance with the rules of geographic label must include: the date of collection, gathering geography, and the name of the collector should all this must be specified. The only trouble is that many traders do not comply with these rules, but this is an isolated incident.In the specific case of butterfly collection a serious scientific organization which should (just have to) be literate labels. Another thing is if you lost ... Here Yuri is right: nothing to do with it.
Basil. Well ... I laugh surname garbage !!! How I got the material from abroad, even from law-abiding Europe ... never ... I did not see the name of the collector, in fact, even the capture of the month - just about. You can only answer for myself caught butterflies. As for Murphy's Law: the best work, the cat. made himself
Basil, I know .. Just over the years, there Does decade - a collection or part repeatedly moved that happened to her during that time .......... As a result, not from each sample can take full infu . Somewhere in there, somewhere in there. Suggestions for possible uchtu.
Yuri, even such a request. If you have the opportunity to retake the material be labeled, please write more and geographical data + date of capture. Note this information on the site is very useful and necessary.
P.S. And for the collection material is also the name of the collector (in the well-written label for centuries, it is indicated).
Yes, and probably not someone once keep track of everything. Entomologists one, two and mute. Current work probably suffice.
The provided name is taken from the label, which lists the contents of the box. Troides taken from the labels pinned on a pin with the sample. Which of them are valid, what is not, I do not know.
What sort of academy, which do not follow titles (1930 and probably hanging :)
Yuri just brought the old name :)
It is necessary to add the name of the subspecies in LC thus: ssp. kaguya (Nakahara et Esaki, 1930)
Not identified / Imago → Troides aeacus / Confidently identified / Male / Yuri Semejkin.
It TROIDES aeacus, male
Papilio aeacus kaguya Nakahara et Esaki , 1930 = Troides
Please, create an account or log in to add comments.
All large size images of Troides aeacus on one page
Please, create an account or log in to upload your photo