Photo #38653: Conistra fletcheri

25.01.2015 11:45, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Conistra ardescens / Alexandr Zhakov → Conistra fletcheri / Irina Nikulina.

24.01.2015 13:38, Irina Nikulina

Sash, I also definitively determined by http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/framepage_hadeninae4.html and also write 3 things that I bowed to the fletcheri : 1. In ardescens a dark area in the lower kidney-shaped spot is small and contrasting different from DOS. Background, from fletcheri , it does not stand out as a contrast, the same color as a dark sash extending from the spot (as in this photo) and 2.the shape and size of the top reniform spots - from ardescens it is often small, bright, round, at the fletcheri - large, almost the background color, but with a light trim at the sash 3. Radical < em> fletcheri have, single, with a projection, sometimes triangular (biglobe.ne.jp and as in the photo) close to the bone and have ardescens it is wider, as if double, especially evident on the 3rd photo here http: //www.jpmoth.org / ~ dmoth / 80_Noctuidae / 23Hadeninae / 3705_Conistra / 3705_Conistra_ardescens / Conistra% 20ardescens.htm
I agree that volatile, but photos and other links somehow outweighed doubts :)

23.01.2015 23:32, Alexandr Zhakov

Finder quickly locates all. :) I had doubts between these two species, but compared on jpmoth and stopped at ardescens. very similar, but has taken into account the form of the bond: basal and outer ardescens have it as it consists of polulunok, while fletcheri like solid with a slight bend. I can view a hindrance. But both highly volatile, can someone else will speak.Let's wait, but doubts arose. :))

23.01.2015 23:14, Irina Nikulina

Sasha, and I saw it more as aConistra fletcheriLook, please. Dame, just a lot of links that you do not look
http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/framepage_hadeninae4.html
http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/~satoyama/tensuzikiriga.html
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8706930@N08/3404126232/
http://photozou.jp/photo/show/176754/171396707
http://gairoto.cocolog-nifty.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2013/10/16/s.jpg

23.01.2015 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov

Of the 6 species of this genus for the 37 and 40 region, only 6 species, of which only looks like this :)
But is only 40 region. It is desirable to clarify.

23.01.2015 17:00, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Not identified → Conistra ardescens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.