Photo #38817: Catocala nupta

04.02.2015 9:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Down with this. tin-plate

02.02.2015 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Please:
http://www.butterflycircle.com/showthread.php?14563-Some-Moths-That-Need-ID-(Part-5)&p=126633#post126633
And what an irony that?
Post # 7, the third link.
On the site it here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27078
Recently I went to the pictures on Google and came across badly familiar :)

02.02.2015 23:14, Shamil Murtazin

already provide links to our website on foreign forums where the determination of a photo exhibit of butterflies (there are examples)
hy-hy ... interesting. let see =)

02.02.2015 21:27, Nikolay Grebennikov

I certainly uchtu

02.02.2015 21:25, Nikolay Grebennikov This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2015 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Already provide links to our website on foreign forums where the determination of a photo exhibit of butterflies (there are examples) ......
Nicholas, no offense, but let's still taken seriously in its own image :)

01.02.2015 21:57, Alexandr Zhakov

It's just disrespectful to all visitors :(, good quality stuff, good quality raspravki, good picture quality, but can be cut exactly? And that you have become the norm. It may in fact be watching around the world. What do people think.

01.02.2015 21:52, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Not identified → Catocala nupta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.02.2015 18:17, Nikolay Grebennikov This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2015 18:17, Nikolay Grebennikov

Well I'm not an expert photographer) as that's how I try))

01.02.2015 17:27, Irina Nikulina

Good flyCatocala nuptaSorry, Nicholas, I can not ask - and what caused such a careless framing (not the first time)?