Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

05.07.2012 19:50, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13576

Idaea serpentata (Hufnagel, 1767).

05.07.2012 19:47, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13571

Cabera pusaria (Linnaeus, 1758).

05.07.2012 18:19, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13603

This species is identified correctly.

05.07.2012 18:15, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13597

Scopula (Scopula) rubiginata (Hufnagel, 1767).

05.07.2012 18:13, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13573

Idaea aversata (Linnaeus, 1758).

02.07.2012 16:03, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13520

Teia antiquiodes.

01.07.2012 16:52, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13534

This species is identified correctly.

01.07.2012 16:52, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13545

Macaria alternata (?) underside.

01.07.2012 16:48, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13544

Macaria alternata, Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775.

01.07.2012 16:45, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13543

Should be the same moth underside? Macaria notata (Linnaeus, 1758).

01.07.2012 16:44, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13542

Macaria notata (Linnaeus, 1758).

01.07.2012 16:43, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13541

Macaria notata (Linnaeus, 1758).

30.06.2012 8:18, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3520

Not Entephria by any means! Colors, pattern, shape of lines, the discal spot, the pattern is quite fragmentized. This is a common Electrophaes corylata.

25.06.2012 8:17, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13457

Supposedly, Scopula corrivalaria (Kretschmar, 1862).

25.06.2012 7:22, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13458

Cabera exanthemata (Scopoli 1763).

25.06.2012 7:15, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13460

Chlorissa viridata (Linnaeus, 1758).

25.06.2012 7:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13468

This species is identified correctly.

25.06.2012 7:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13469

This species is identified correctly.

25.06.2012 7:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13470

This species is identified correctly.

23.06.2012 19:24, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13384

Odontopera bidentata (Clerck, 1759).

23.06.2012 19:24, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13385

Odontopera bidentata (Clerck, 1759).

21.06.2012 16:55, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13181

Most probably, this is Trichopteryx carpinata...

21.06.2012 16:41, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13318

This species is identified correctly.

21.06.2012 16:40, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13411

This species is identified correctly.

21.06.2012 16:39, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13337

This species is identified correctly.

21.06.2012 16:38, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13352

This species is identified correctly.

21.06.2012 16:14, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13407

Ectropis crepuscularia ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775).

21.06.2012 15:58, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13370

This species is identified correctly.

21.06.2012 15:57, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13369

This species is identified correctly.

21.06.2012 15:53, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13409

Ochyria quadrifasciaria (Clerck, 1759) is below.

21.06.2012 15:50, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13406

Ochyria quadrifasciaria (Clerck, 1759).

19.06.2012 11:01, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13244

Hypena proboscidalis (barely seen its long antennae on the dark background).

18.06.2012 19:04, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13261

Perhaps, Itame brunneata males.

18.06.2012 18:58, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #12072

This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 18:57, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #12067

This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 18:57, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #12066

This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 18:57, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #12064

This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 18:56, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #12063

This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 18:56, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #12062

This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 18:56, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #12076

This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 8:41, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13110

This species is identified correctly.

12.12.2011 9:41, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #10655

Euproctis similis, probably, of the last age (the red pigment is less). But there should be already next generation in junior ages in September, this one seems to be late from the previous brood... Suppose, it's damaged with myco or something (looks unhealthy, faded, with no brushes, in unnatural pose).

11.12.2011 12:12, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #7980

Approve the author's version Gynaephora selenitica (Esper, 1783).

11.12.2011 12:07, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #9048

Acronicta rumicis L.

11.12.2011 11:49, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #10021

Smerinthus..., probably, S.planus.

11.12.2011 10:03, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #10656

Cucullia lactucae ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775) (seems to be sitting on lettuces).

11.12.2011 9:58, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #10655

Two glands on next-to-last segments mean Lymantriidae, bushy hair and locks of tough hair plus bristles mean Clostera, orange spinal stripes and blacky-grey warts with locks of compound stuff as white fleecy bristles mean Sphrageidus similis (Fuessly, 1775).