Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Now, I agree. The strip does not matter. Reason: In the subfamily Erebinae-tribe Catocalini (which previously was subfamily) there is only one kind of Leucomela and probably only one kind juvenilis. In any case, among the scoop lentochnits anything similar is not present. So what can be safely transferred to a Leucomelas juvenilis
Yes, we are talking about the strip with the colors that I had never seen in their pictures. Perhaps he once was, and then disappeared with age? .but And this mystery is unknown to me
Evgeny, thanks! At least the thing started moving. I'll try to ask local experts here, just matter of time. If there be something cleared up, I'll add the info.
06.06.2013, Evgeny Karolinsky: dulcinea/melete Agree. One of these two. Evgeny! Let's try to clear this up. Basing on the identification guide. 1. Pieris dulcinea Butl. Looking at the ID guide, we can say that dulcinea has specific dark dust around veins which (dust) can be as wide as narrow, often narrowing to the margin. Let's not rely on spots which can be as well absent. Seems like fits ...
06.06.2013 18:57, Petr Khramov: And at exactly it with such conductors? Yes
I know. Such a phrase in his time came from matte through my pictures. I am confused on the rear wings at the bottom (such as it is called back corner) the presence of dark blue with a purple tinge narrow band (between white). Therefore, I put the question. No one my picture is not a strip, and the little things sometimes distinguish species.
Yes, it's underside
Aporia crataegi L
Euclidia juvenilis?
Euclidia juvenilis?
Driopa stubbendorfii Men
I threw what I was given. Regarding synonym Spilosoma supposedly offered me (But I did not offer). Vasily, do not hang up on me, "other dogs." You are well aware of whose zayavlenie.Prichёm is stated twice - in two pictures. And if you have forgotten, look at the bottom of the chronology of the May 24, 2013 Time 23:45 and above. It is perfectly visible.After all, is not it? Someone here ...
In general, Vasily. Why do you answer for Alexander?. He signed it is a synonym. With his "cheese -Bor" began. Here let himself intelligible answer. It is better in a personal, not to fence the garden again
It is not a question to me
In this case, the question to Alexander. Where did you get that is synonymous? 05.24.2013 11:42 Alexander Zhakov: All right, this is another synonym. 05.23.2013 23:45 Yuri Semeykin: Kononenko VS BPI FEB RAS. Defined as Spilosoma niveum
Someone from modders can still add the synonym-Spilosoma niveum. To prodobnaya situation of this kind are no longer created.
Butterflies are small, 4-5 mm long. Remove the larger has not yet been
Alexander. I have nothing protiv.Skinul because clarify, because In the description of the missing synonym. Although some butterflies list of synonyms can be seen longer. Here only three synonym.
In principle, this and # 13786, and can be deleted, since there is almost like better pictures from one place
Kononenko VS BPI FEB RAS. Defined as Spilosoma niveum
Define: Belyaev EA BPI FEB RAS
Kononenko VS I defined as Spilosoma niveum
Catocala nupta (Linnaeus, 1767)?
Already understood, anyway thanks for the info.
Alexandr, already got the meaning, but thanks anyway for your time. Some people do want look smarty.
What's IMHO?
Petr, here's the link http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/vvdubat/pdf/AZJ2(4)303-321.pdf with the publication on Geometridae (Insecta, lepidoptera: Geometridae) of Bolshehehtsirsky State Natural Reserve (near Khabarovsk) by E. A. Belyaev, S. V. Vasilenko, V. V. Dubatolov, A. M. Dolghikh. In this publication the moth is named Comibaena delicator, an East Asian subboreal-subtropical forest species, see page 12.
Spring generation female which have flown a lot.
No one has provided a reference to the identity of both species at the same larva, pupa. As they say - taxonomy argue. Maybe still is placed in inaccurate opredelёёnnye?
Again, any glitch. Part Copy is not my
A base? I went on this link, but there is also no biology. According to this explanation, it is clear there are no data on the COI gene only 4 Central (from Luhtanova) and 1st Chinese copies. Who are edusa, who daplidice - is unclear. Differences in gene sequences between individuals of practically no.Unfortunately, the more northern specimens (where theoretically lives edusa) did not ...
Pigs might fly. Would never think this is one of Lepidoptera too.
Achillides maackii.
This species is identified correctly.
Alexandr! Thanks for your elaboration. Still I have a question. Alexandr, if it's not a big dig (don't want to make a long search on the web to clear this out), would you please say if there is any difference in biology between Pontia daplidice and P. edusa (say, larvae or host plants)? Or genitalia?
Pontia daplidice.
Yeah, I got it. I think there is nothing to be worry about, Petr will notice this bug and fix all the things, add you as identifier in a proper way.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Looks like Geometra papilionaria L.
Who is this Tuzov? Where to seek for?
Hello, Alexander! I do not understand on what basis you put all of our discussion into question? Do you want a 100% guarantee determination, it just can not be (in this version). Special literature, as you write, difficult for an amateur Alexander, the theme on the matter in general is closed, so in poreshali agent Ira.But few will answer your questions. I do not doubt your determination. As ...
With tropics or just the ex-USSR?
Ira, when Alexander chё here? Here his point of view is. 03.21.2013 13:47 Alexander Zhakov: Alas, Yuri, I have repeatedly expressed my opinion and a lot written on this page. three participant discussion came to one the most probable opinion, one does not come to what is not, but against it.You are right on this particular photo can be no doubt, therefore, must make a determination (a type ...
All possible options, such as indicated here, and inaccurate in nature can be transferred to whom that like it. Just me. -So do not understand that. It seems to have a job, where all agree that disk imaging to determine the underside only, at the moment is not enough, that it is necessary to gain materyal, in future, make it possible to determine the background.Yet, going from time to time, ...
Now everything is Ok!
Ypsolopha blandella (Christoph,1882), identified by M. Ponomarenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Science FEB RAS.
No objections.
Er, yes at what all this. There would be food, and there are butterflies.
I am against (at least for now) transfer. Or me and everyone. who participated in the discussions, you can not ask? Er, where are your arguments?
News
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
- 28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
- 19.03.2024: Insecta.pro and the entomological forum Integration
New photos (28.04.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:50, P. Khramov: Confidently identified → Tentativel...
- 18:03, P. Khramov: A nice video from 2004 with Oleg Go...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Video: Arctiidae moths can muffle bat sonar
