E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

26.03.2013 23:34, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21540

Belyaeva answer: Hello Yuri! Apparently, your photos, really, Celastrina oreas. In other, much to the surprise of her discovery of the boat. garden does not have to. In the vicinity of Vladivostok widely introduced into the culture Prinsep (Prinsepia sinensis), fodder plant and its caterpillars Celastrina filipjevi.We recently put a little acoustic Prinsep at our cottage on the satellite, so ...

26.03.2013 12:38, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21540

Er, I do not understand duck. In your opinion, it is still Filipeva

25.03.2013 0:33, Yuri Semejkin: comment on Celastrina oreas

Thanks Peter! INFA ischёrpyvayuschaya. No questions

24.03.2013 2:53, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21540

Why reacted to oreas? But somehow I have it not fit into the other. Copper-butterfly. I found in the internet that's kind of like like http://www.treefrog.ru/photo/category/14-oreas.html The picture took off.

23.03.2013 23:37, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21540

Ira, and why should they be the only 2 places? Remember the story of the Pacific marshmallow, which was known only to the Blue Ridge. Dr. Example: On the tracks of marshmallows, -vezde write and say what they have to look at height, on top of the tree. But I found them at a height of 1 m from the ground With regard to the file. Well-il, I will cast his Belyaev.If he is not on a business ...

23.03.2013 13:13, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21500

Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi. Quite rare species.

23.03.2013 12:13, Yuri Semejkin: comment on Celastrina oreas

Ps The evidence is still at issue

23.03.2013 12:07, Yuri Semejkin: comment on Celastrina oreas

Peter, Il. And why all this rewriting?

23.03.2013 3:46, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6379

Now seen.

23.03.2013 1:35, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6379

Again pic's unseen.

23.03.2013 1:34, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6378

The pic lost again.

23.03.2013 1:28, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21544

Neither can I see. It's in the section "Photo Gallery updates" but not here.

21.03.2013 11:52, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6380

Alexander justify their point of view (without bush) and particular snapshot

21.03.2013 0:07, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #11746

Down on a given page there is "Butterflies in nature" link, better to check the lowest pic.

20.03.2013 23:53, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6380

I would not tolerate, at least for now. Like all came to the conclusion that of information in this case is not enough

20.03.2013 16:06, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6378

Petr, then this one may be moved as well to Celastrina filipjevi.

20.03.2013 12:44, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6379

If you focus on the core underside and nature spots I would have brought it to the Maslowskia filipjevi Riley. What confuses? Kurentsov writes: The underside of both sexes silvery white ..... In this case, about the underside do not say. What though of nothing says, along with a painting, fly, including together with silver and white (Chinese ploskosemyannik near growing).In general, it seems ...

19.03.2013 16:11, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #11746

I think it still looks more of Pieris bryoniae. Here Berlov's pic, just compare http://babochki.narod.ru/pi24pr.html. The same strong veins and large "median cell" on sides of its head. As for the very cell, might call it wrong, please correct.

18.03.2013 9:51, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #13760

Question to all. According to Kourentzov the underside's venation of both hind and forewings has dark brown or greenish lurid fringe, the species is Pieris napi. Here we have P. melete. Anyone can comment why it's melete and what's the difference?

15.03.2013 15:04, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21457

Petr, nothing changed yet. There was the same Neptis philyra.

11.03.2013 15:27, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21457

One more to check: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mushimizu/7559204160/.

09.03.2013 8:00, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21457

Neptis philyra Men.

08.03.2013 15:50, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21461

Neptis tschetverikovi.

08.03.2013 5:52, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21457

Dmitry, would you please look at http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21256? I reckon these two are the same species, and the streaks look alike. Would be great to hear your opinion, whether I'm right or wrong.

07.03.2013 11:15, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21256

Dmitry, thanks! Method of exclusion is still a method.

06.03.2013 14:15, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21265

Alexandr, thanks! Looks like not entirely hopeless, there is a beam of light! Sure, there's a way with a will, and maybe it's the best solution. Anyway, would be great to find a shorter way, to discuss things out and eventually clear them up. Definitely.

06.03.2013 14:05, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21265

Petr! Don't you please taunt. Or if the very website administrator is talking like that, shalll the whole website be deleted as hopeless, totally of no use?

06.03.2013 8:41, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21265

Well, looks like we have no experts in Pieridae. Then the whole family should be removed from the website.

05.03.2013 0:09, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21265

Likely to be another species? Reason: Pieris brassicae shouldn't commonly have medial cell. Or?

02.03.2013 23:58, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21256

Yeah, right. C'est la vie as it's said. What's about the very species? May this suit http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/7679?

02.03.2013 7:09, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21267

"Yury, what would you think identifying species in nature photo?" Vasily, you didn't answer the question.

02.03.2013 3:34, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #8103

Petr, lesson learned. Henceforth will keep an eye on that. As for photos of mine, I randomly checked several, so no bugs.

02.03.2013 3:27, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21256

Guys, would you please take more care in the section "Other photos of this specimen"? There is an underside pic, just look on the right and you may see that.

02.03.2013 3:22, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21267

Vasily! May I ask something please? What did you base upon to ID this as dulcinea (I checked the link given)? What made you think this a sure thing? Taking into account I'm not a pro, just want to clear things up.

02.03.2013 3:07, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21276

Petr, might it have appeared after the Sinev's book? Anyway, the species is described in the book "Pyralids (Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea: Pyralidae, Crambidae) of the fauna оf Russian Far East", V. A. Kirpichnikova, Dal'nauka, Vladivostok (2009), V. L. Komarov Mountain-Taiga Station, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences. See page 286 or tables 1, 46.

27.02.2013 0:13, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #8103

Petr, thanks. Did it and worked out. No bugs!

26.02.2013 14:45, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #8103

Petr, you were right! I've checked the page from different PCs, so it works good there. Appears my browser bug to find it out, why it happens with this very file only.

23.02.2013 11:22, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21268

When comparing, I see the venation is different. Or am I wrong?

22.02.2013 12:33, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #8103

Petr. Nothing happens. It somehow goes wrong only with this very file. Because new species? Suggest to remove, besides it has a wrong name. I'll reupload once it gets surely identified.

22.02.2013 0:11, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #8103

http://lepidoptera.pro/images/1024/8103 says "page not found".

19.02.2013 16:58, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #8103

Pressed Ctrl+F5, the page twitched but no changes.

19.02.2013 16:53, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6380

Ira, what did you see, is one thing. But zde underside of a particular image, on the other. Place in which no one has proved that it is such a unique look.

19.02.2013 16:03, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21266

Pieris melete?

19.02.2013 14:23, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #8103

Lev, did that but nothing changed. Curiously this only image's broken.

19.02.2013 0:05, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #8103

Petr! Despite the photo fixed, nothing changed. Bug's still there.

18.02.2013 16:22, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21256

Neptis sappho?

18.02.2013 16:21, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21257

Neptis sappho?

18.02.2013 16:17, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21255

Glaucopsyche lycormas.

18.02.2013 13:00, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6380

Thank you all! Perhaps now no one will disagree that to uniquely identify the type of data is not enough. In pritsipe picture can be removed-as useless.

18.02.2013 0:26, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #21046

So again I've been collating this shot and one of Lymantria dispar http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21022, can't see the difference. Anybody please explain?

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.