E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493... 497

06.02.2011 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Papilio palinurus

Fabricius, 1787 (year to finish).

06.02.2011 11:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Papilio glaucus

Linnaeus, 1758 (the year indicate)

06.02.2011 11:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Papilio euchenor

Guérin-Méneville, 1829 (corrected)

06.02.2011 11:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Papilio fuscus

Goeze, 1779 (year to finish)

06.02.2011 11:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5058

Genus added.

06.02.2011 7:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5081

Genus added.

06.02.2011 6:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5025

Genus done, move.

05.02.2011 13:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5058

Ok then, let it be Phrygionis paradoxata (Guenée, [1858]), that's it. Will be corrected if needed.

05.02.2011 13:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5058

Both names are to set as synonyms, Phrygionis paradoxata (Guenée, [1858]) and Phrygionis argentata (Drury, 1773). Not do subspecies though, incolorata, Prout, 1910 (unknown).

05.02.2011 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4748

This species is identified correctly.

05.02.2011 12:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5058

There is also argentata: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/geometroidea/geometridae/ennominae/phrygionis/index.html#argentat. What should we consider default?

05.02.2011 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5058

Yes, confusing. Your suggestion was my first thought, saw your link before and found out after this: http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/species.php?hodges=6671, thus offered argentata.

05.02.2011 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5058

Some Phrygionis, suspect, Phrygionis argentata (Drury, 1773).

05.02.2011 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5081

Hemiceras lissanella, Thiaucourt, 1994, imho. http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_notodontidae_2.htm.

05.02.2011 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5025

Seems to me this one is Eulepidotis juliata (Stoll, 1790) http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_noctuidae_3.htm.

04.02.2011 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5005

Same: http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Adeloneivaia%20catoxantha.htm.

04.02.2011 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5010

Hm, not sure also, guys, choose one. It really varies, http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Adeloneivaia%20boisduvali.htm and http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_saturniidae_2.htm, French and Germans are of different opinions, so :)

04.02.2011 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5005

And I think, this is Adeloneivaia catoxantha male (Rothschild,1907). No any closer: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_saturniidae_2.htm.

04.02.2011 18:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5010

Petr, no mistakes: I just copypasted another source.

04.02.2011 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5010

Petr, should be two "i": http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/bombycoidea/saturniidae/ceratocampinae/adeloneivaia/index.

04.02.2011 8:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5007

This one is also Zatrephes trailii Butler, 1877. Let's move there.

03.02.2011 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5019

Some Dalceridae, can't continue further.

03.02.2011 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4994

Ok then, no doubts: Limacodidae, Miresa clarissa, (Stoll, 1790), female.

03.02.2011 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #1466

Female.

03.02.2011 8:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5028

Konstantin, that is well-known http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thysania_agrippina.

01.02.2011 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5053

Idalus intermedia (Rothschild, 1909), seems to be one? Arctiidae.

01.02.2011 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5013

For the record: just added this genus, begin Arctiidae work (will check new genera added).

01.02.2011 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5013

Final adding of family means that species is identified successfully.

01.02.2011 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5010

Saturniidae female.

01.02.2011 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5010

Adeloneivaia boisduvalii (Doumet, 1859).

01.02.2011 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5052

Dalceridae.

01.02.2011 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5013

Yes, that's it, the most similar to http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_02/texte/z_traili.htm.

01.02.2011 15:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5052

Acraga infusa [Schaus 1905]?

01.02.2011 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5074

This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5015

Celiptera levina (Stoll, 1782)?

01.02.2011 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5028

That is the very underside (I was wrong), mishmash.

01.02.2011 14:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5006

Can be Semaeopus subtincta, Warren, 1897.

01.02.2011 13:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5028

Looks like one of its versions. See the similar one: http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Noctuidae/Guy%2001181_modi1-s3.jpg.

01.02.2011 13:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5028

This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5072

Obvious Arctiidae, something like Lophocampa maroniensis???

01.02.2011 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5071

May be Antiblemma trogocycla, Hampson, 1926, but sooo questionable.

01.02.2011 12:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5024

Sericoptera mahometaria, Herrich-Schäffer, [1853].

01.02.2011 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5051

Hemeroblemma dolosa male, Hübner, [1823] (no suggestions more).

01.02.2011 12:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5070

The same as #5071, I think, or something close to.

01.02.2011 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5071

Antiblemma orbiculata (Felder & Rogenhofer, 1874)?

01.02.2011 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5073

May be http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_01/texte/r_klages.htm or something close to.

01.02.2011 10:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5073

Think, this is Robinsonia sp. (Arctiidae).

01.02.2011 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5066

Va banque: Leuciris fimbriaria, Stoll, 1781.

01.02.2011 9:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5002

Can be (who knows, this is America however).

01.02.2011 9:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5069

Pure Arctiidae. Cresera ilioides (Schaus, 1905)?

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.