Photo #2653: Lemonia taraxaci

13.09.2015 15:59, Peter Khramov

Well, I say ....
I'm in plain text seems to be written - I do not need to say anything, everything has long been discussed, what once again from an empty but in a net.
Crooked legislation in this case (as well as in all) (((
Firstly, it is in this case curved. In the repeat, in all its curves, too, can not be named. Do not simplify. From an ethical point of view, it will look ugly in relation to the author.
There will not. Too long ago to grind all, including and authors.
Who knows but himself that he wanted to show this photo? No ....
If there are any special things that the author wants to show he is writing about it in a note.And if for them, no one knows what the price it worthless.
Maybe he wanted to show the variability of sex? As I once here: https://insecta.pro/gallery/38912
Maybe. Just to show it in the framework of the gallery on one fote - wrong. As part of the gallery is to do on the individual fotah, if desired - with comments. We do not live in the book.Many times I repeat: it is not a window dressing siyumitnoy something rastakaya under the current features of the site. The fact gramtnom making information that can then be distributed on the shelves. The point is not to show demorfizm one species in book illustration and be immensely happy about this.The point is to seal the basis for a comfortable display demorfizma from a variety of species such as this only interfere foty (compared to the situation where a male and female would be exposed separately).
In my view these photos, which shows both sexes must not touch in any case.
And I think all of them should be changed to separate.Do not just change for technical reasons.

For all: trying to ship as much as possible a collector's item on fote. All information and a comparison should be carried out only between different fotami only software. Any questions / suggestions - write.

13.09.2015 15:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Well, what I say ....
Distorting the law in this case (as well as in all) (((
From an ethical point of view, it will look ugly in relation to the author.
Who knows but himself that he wanted to show this photo? No one....
Maybe he wanted to show the variability of sex? As I once here: http: // insecta.pro / ru / gallery / 38912
In my view these photos, which shows both sexes must not touch in any case.

13.09.2015 14:49, Peter Khramov

Point may be. Regarding the right - I already explained everything in the phone and TZ the legislation of the Russian Federation, and with TZ concepts. In such cases we must first seek the consent.
Who is interested in the rights of authors in the photo as part of this site - all issues to me.
And share this photo is not going purely for technical reasons.

13.09.2015 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Especially without the author's consent to split (divide) photos can not. It will not be easy editing and split the author intended the composition to which it has the appropriate rights) In such cases, we must first seek the consent of his.
Let it be as it is.

13.09.2015 13:54, Alexandr Zhakov

What for? let it be as it is, from 3000, is history. :).

13.09.2015 13:14, Shamil Murtazin

Share the photo should be? ..