Identification of Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants)

This is Pimpla sp. (Ichneumonidae, Pimplinae), further on these photos in any way

so what should I take a bigger picture of?.. face mask, first/nth tergite, belly?..

This post was edited by rumpelstiltskin - 10.08.2014 18: 47

Slobodskoy district of the Kirov region. August 7.
Size 7-8 mm.
There is a version, but I will not voice it yet, so as not to confuse experts from the right path.

I don't see if there is a sharp border between the vertical and horizontal parts of the first tergite?

I don't see if there is a sharp border between the vertical and horizontal parts of the first tergite?

Well, how can you look in there? Well, okay, maybe it will work out.
And what are the options with and without a border?

No, this is a male Ectemnius dives.
Carefully check the upper part of the forehead for any transverse ribs.
By the way, representatives of the Hypocrabo subgenus, which also includes E. rubicola, are characterized by a noticeably smaller size of light spots on the 3rd tergite of the abdomen in comparison with spots on the 2nd and 4th tergites. But even more common is their complete absence.

Yes, Alexander, you are absolutely right. Both the upper part of the forehead and the shape of the 1st member of the middle legs and the structure of the antennae, all indicate that these are dives

8 mm. 3rd chl .mustache with strong 2 teeth. 4,5-e with slightly outlined bumps. Platypus with a rather elongated top. Mandibles without internal tooth. The gap.a segment with a rather rough cellular sculpture. 2-5 tergites with yellow spots, the 6th with a yellow band. I believe it is a male Ectemnius lapidarius

Slobodskoy district of the Kirov region. August 7.
Size 7-8 mm.
There is a version, but I will not voice it yet, so as not to confuse experts from the right path.

Maybe Osmia (Hoplosmia) spinulosa?

Well, how can you look in there? Well, okay, maybe it will work out.
And what are the options with and without a border?

With a Heriades border. In principle, a little similar.
Well, if not, then dear Carcharot-Osmia is right.

This post was edited by alex 2611-12.08.2014 17: 59

Maybe Osmia (Hoplosmia) spinulosa?

To the point!
That was my version. Actually, I went specifically to look for this bee on the local limestone outlet according to the information received. I only met one person.

Please tell me about this bembix. Size 22 mm, caught in Perm.

Pictures:

9.jpg — (617.98к)


10.jpg — (505.39 k)


11.jpg — (559.84к)

Help the OS determine. Last week, Mordovia, crawled under the roots of an oak tree in a mixed forest. Unfortunately, I only managed to take these two photos

Pictures:

DSC01982.jpg — (271.87к)


DSC01987.jpg — (259.44к)

Help the OS determine. Last week, Mordovia, crawled under the roots of an oak tree in a mixed forest. Unfortunately, I only managed to take these two photos

Dolichovespula media-medium wasp

Please tell me about this bembix. Size 22 mm, caught in Perm.

In my unprofessional opinion - a female Bembix rostrata (Crabronidae).
But let the experts tell you.

Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. August 10.
Anthidium manicatum?

Help me determine:

2011, Novorossiysk



2011, Elektrougli, Moscow region

Please tell me who he is. Moscow region, August 9.

Male Urocerus gigas

[quote=bakamushi,05.08.2014 15:21]

Good afternoon. Help us identify the sawfly. South of the Perm Region, June.

Russian Federation Leningrad region Romanovka 04.06.14
1) Bombus lapidarius ?
2) Bombus terrestris ? They have a yellow stripe on the upper tergite that is intermittent, or they are not systematic variations (just interesting).

This post was edited by Trofim - 16.08.2014 21: 48

Pictures:

IMG_6532.JPG — (121.2к)


IMG_6531.JPG — (149.99 k)

Good afternoon. Help us identify the sawfly. South of the Perm Region, June.

Tenthredopsis sp.

8 mm. 3rd chl .mustache with strong 2 teeth. 4,5-e with slightly outlined bumps. Platypus with a rather elongated top. Mandibles without internal tooth. The gap.a segment with a rather rough cellular sculpture. 2-5 tergites with yellow spots, the 6th with a yellow band. I believe it is a male Ectemnius lapidarius

Yes, this is it.
But you didn't mention the most important one (!) features of this view, which is clearly visible in your images. Among all our species of the subgenus Clythochrysus, this species is distinguished by the fact that the posterior side of its propodeum is completely bounded by strong sharp ridges. There is no one to confuse it with.

Please tell me what kind of animal it is. Moscow region, August 17.

Pictures:

DSCN9372_1.jpg — (270.78к)

Male Urocerus gigas

Thank you very much!

Yes, this is it.
But you didn't mention the most important one (!) features of this view, which is clearly visible in your images. Among all our species of the subgenus Clythochrysus, this species is distinguished by the fact that the posterior side of its propodeum is completely bounded by strong sharp ridges. There is no one to confuse it with.

Yes, I forgot, although I deliberately took this sign

Tenthredopsis sp.

Thanks!

Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. The month of August.

The list of Vyatka Megachile includes the following species:
•Megachile alpicola Alfken, 1928;
M. analis Nylander, 1852;
M. bombycina Radoszowski, 1874;
°M. centuncularis (Linnaeus, 1758);
•M. circumcincta (Kirby, 1802);
M. ericetorum (Lepeletier, 1841);
M. genalis Morawitz, 1880;
•M. lagopoda (Linnaeus, 1761);
•M. lapponica Thomson, 1872;
•M. ligniseca (Kirby, 1802);
M. maritima (Kirby, 1802);
*M. nigriventris Schenck, 1870;
*M. pilidens Alfken, 1924;
°M. rotundata (Fabricius, 1787);
M. versicolor Smith, 1844;
M. willughbiella (Kirby, 1802);

The bigger one isn't the biggest yet. I saw at least 2 cm long, but I think it was bigger.
Can we at least assume what kind of species?

What's wrong with lagopoda? It can also be larger than 20 mm? Although without an instance and without keys-this is only a guess....

What's wrong with lagopoda? It can also be larger than 20 mm? Although without an instance and without keys-this is only a guess....

As I understand it, up to the type of bee in the photo, with rare exceptions, are not determined. At least I found out that the big one might be lagopoda.
And by Anthidium Can I say something?"
Just in case, there are three views in the area:
•Anthidium manicatum (Linnaeus, 1758);
°A. punctatum Latreille, 1809;
A. septemspinosum Lepeletier, 1841;

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. August 13.
I watched a wasp hunt a weevil. I couldn't tell for myself. Please help us.
I couldn't get it off properly, so please blame me.

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. August 13.
I watched a wasp hunt a weevil. I couldn't tell for myself. Please help us.
I couldn't get it off properly, so please blame me.

Cerceris sp.

As I understand it, up to the type of bee in the photo, with rare exceptions, are not determined. At least I found out that the big one might be lagopoda.
And by Anthidium Can I say something?"
Just in case, there are three views in the area:
•Anthidium manicatum (Linnaeus, 1758);
°A. punctatum Latreille, 1809;
A. septemspinosum Lepeletier, 1841;

Who knows, but megahills and antidiums are not poorly represented in the "green". T3 part 1... And as far as I remember, all three types of antidiums that you indicated do not differ badly in the color of the platbands... - one of the express signs. Take a look, I think many questions will disappear by themselves! And these are not andrenes with nomads that are mixed up in green(I mean keys).

The color of the body spots is light yellow, almost white. The platypus is black in front, the top is almost straight, with three barely noticeable bumps. The dotted line is more sparse than the side parts of the face. Sides of the mid-chest in rough spots, sometimes turning into wrinkles. Median field of the gap. a segment with clear longitudinal grooves. 2-5 tergites with identical light yellow spots on the sides. On the 6th, the spots are small. The dotted line is rough, rather thick, but the dots are slightly smaller than, say, in C. quinquefasciata. In general, it is similar to this species, but in addition to the less rough points on the tergites, the points are less rough on the sides of the gaps.a segment.The sides of the mid-chest, unlike C. quinquefasciata, do not have cellular large dots, the dotted line is more tangled, forming horizontal wrinkles. Groups of hairs from the sides of the 6th tergite do not see, especially glued together. 7th sternite with a deep notch on the top and short hairs. The top of the 6th sternite is bare. The middle shins are not curved. The pygidium is quite broad. There are no options yet. In general, I came across two interesting copies. The second one has small spots on the sides of the first tergite.








This post was edited by akulich-sibiria - 08/20/2014 16: 50

Who knows, but megahills and antidiums are not poorly represented in the "green". T3 part 1... And as far as I remember, all three types of antidiums that you indicated do not differ badly in the color of the platbands... - one of the express signs. Take a look, I think many questions will disappear by themselves! And these are not andrenes with nomads that are mixed up in green(I mean keys).

I don't have a green one, just like any other.
A. punctatum was discarded immediately - it doesn't look like mine at all.
A. manicatum the shape of the platband is different.
But the male Anthidium septemspinosum "just the thing!
Thank you for your help!

I don't have a green one, just like any other.
A. punctatum was discarded immediately - it doesn't look like mine at all.
A. manicatum the shape of the platband is different.
But the male Anthidium septemspinosum "just the thing!
Thank you for your help!

Actually, the green one can be downloaded. Hp: http://elar. urfu. ru/bitstream/10995/1905/1/852619. pdf
And about septemspinosum - I would not say so! Your photos don't show any spots, trim, or spikes.... It can be seen that the antidium, possibly with a completely yellow trim...

This post was edited by Oldcatcher - 08/19/2014 21: 45

What is the dispute about anyway? If about this -

Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. August 10.
Anthidium manicatum?

"then it's a male Anthidium manicatum. What's wrong with the trim panel? A. septemspinosum has seven teeth (hence the name) on its belly (on the last three segments), the extreme teeth on the last segment are straight, and the front of the chest is always spotless.

This post was edited by Carcharot - 08/20/2014 09: 56

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. August 13.
I watched a wasp hunt a weevil. I couldn't tell for myself. Please help us.

Cerceris quinquefasciata (Rossi, 1792)

Actually, the green one can be downloaded. Hp: http://elar. urfu. ru/bitstream/10995/1905/1/852619. pdf
And about septemspinosum - I would not say so! Your photos don't show any spots, trim, or spikes.... It can be seen that the antidium, possibly with a completely yellow trim...

Thank you for downloading it.

"-11 (12). The head of the female in front and all the lower legs of the female and male are completely black. 5-6 th terg. br. 3
on the sides with a tooth, lateral teeth of the 7th terg. 149, 8).
females — 10-13; males-14-16. Everywhere, except north, but rare
........ A. septemspinosum Lep.
-16 (15). 7th terg. br. of a male with 3 teeth (Figs. 149, 10). Wed. and posterior. the female's thighs are reddish.
Br. the brush is yellowish-golden. Female-11-13; male-14-17. - Except sev.
........ A. manicatum L."

Not a word about platbands here. I also compared the shape of the platband from the pictures on biolib.cz
Anthidium septemspinosum
Anthidium manicatum

What is the dispute about anyway? If that's the case , it
's a male Anthidium manicatum. What's wrong with the trim panel? A. septemspinosum has seven teeth (hence the name) on its belly (on the last three segments), the extreme teeth on the last segment are straight, and the front of the chest is always spotless.

Well, one head is good, but three is better.
I looked at the teeth... it seems to me that there are 7 of them, I'll go try to take a picture.

Yes, the male manicatum is! You were on the right track from the very beginning!

Well, here are the prongs.
And still manicatum?

Cerceris quinquefasciata (Rossi, 1792)actively catches elephants in our latitudes

Thank you, it looks like it.
Maybe AVA will look again and make her verdict.