Identification of Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants)

Hello, on the subject of Sceliphron deforme, you can say something specifically, it's not him, just far from the determinants, and I want to understand whether I still run through puddles for them or not
Thanks

I was already fishing that year, and Yura Danilov confirmed it to me. They were caught in the Krasnoyarsk Territory, Minusinsk district, and the city of Minusinsk. Right in the city, the puddles were spinning. I was like Klava jumping in the mud, but I could only catch one)))

And was it worth the ride? There is no need to sit quietly and watch where they fly from. Usually make nests under slate roofs. In fact, this is not uncommon in the East. That's why I clarified - now it can be found even on the Black Sea coast of the Caucasus.

and what is the east?? Yes, I looked, I met them in puddles within a radius of 500 m, but I couldn't track where they came from. Therefore, in order to have at least one copy, I had to climb in the mud near the tire shop.

  

Shot by a friend on the Karelian Isthmus. Obviously some kind of hymenopteran, probably a wasp. But since I'm not an entomologist, I can't be more specific

1. Male ants. Obviously during swarming. Unfortunately, there are too many artifacts (drops, etc.), the dimensions are not clear, and key features are not visible even for determining the pre-genus.
2. Female burrowing wasp Stizus ruficornis
3. Female road wasp, most likely Cryptocheilus annulatus
4. Female bee from haliktinas

And I would say that number 3 is a male Cryptocheilus rubellus

Tell me, this color of the abdomen may be characteristic of sabulosa or it looks more like rybyensis?? ... the platypus is rather concave in the middle. Thighs mostly red. There are short scutes along the edges of the pygidial field.
On the 5th tergite, the light bar is larger than on the 4th
I apologize for the quality of the pictures, I shoot at home through optics without adapters.

Please help with wasps.

Something new for me. It seems to me that this is Styzus perrisii Duf male.

thank you Alexander, I have two more of this kind languishing at home from old fees. ))
just at home now you can take photos, mobile and immediately know what angles and signs you need. that's just a little sick quality.

well, there is a green filter, like almost all mbs. I shoot it, and everything turns out red oversaturated! although you should try to take a photo without a filter, because it may be easier to change the color to neutral. Otherwise, what can you do? I will show on my fingers that red is red, and green is green ))))

well, there is a green filter, like almost all mbs. I'm taking it off

Antennae of 12 segments, abdomen of 6. Why male?
Further, to distinguish these species only by the shade of light color on the abdomen is a thankless task. Can you guarantee that the color reproduction in the image is completely adequate? I'm not... And more important signs, for obvious reasons, are simply not visible. So, you can guess.

Thank you. Can you take a look?

without a filter, the colors are more natural, and you don't even need to process them too much.
Female, 17 mm. between Stizus perrisi and S. fasciatus
, the scutellum is black with yellow spots. The gap. the segment is pubescent with rather thick protruding light hairs. It is difficult to understand whether the sculpture is being hidden or not. Rather visible. There is no red color on the body. The hind legs are slightly concave at the apex.

Very similar to S. perrisi, but on 6 tergite I never found a black spot. Although it's hidden, I still didn't see it. Either this species or terminalis

that is, where? Where is it located?

Yes, and how to remove it from there, if anything

well, I don't know, everything is simple for me, it turns out on the lamp right outside....I really don't know why such a green shade is needed at all, it's very inconvenient, cloudy and the color is different, although it may protect you from something