Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

something doubted at the expense of inclusion in the Eanus costalis. 7 mm. Khakassia, Krasnoyarsk Region. It is confusing that the pronotum is not transverse, but the length is still equal to the width. I have one specimen of this exact species, and its pronotum is clearly transverse. However, the punctuation of the pronotum is similar, rather rare and not deep, there are no umbilical dots (just at the beginning it seemed that it was Sericus, its dark shape). Femoral tires slightly tapering to the outer edge. Epipleura and the outer edge of the elytra with a rather thin light stripe. The top is quite sparse, but clearly visible hairs. The forehead is rather convex, its front edge is not bordered...

The most typical Eanus costalis. I wouldn't doubt it .
The male is simply, therefore, slimmer than a few

Help with beetles, good people
Moscow region, Lukhovitsky district, Beloomut settlement, May 2011

Pictures:

11_05_2011.jpg — (64.62к)


29_05_2011.jpg — (88.13к)

And MO, Ramenskiy district, okr. platf. 41km on Kazanskaya railway, June 24, 2012.

Pictures:

24_06_2012.jpg — (110.06к)


24_06__2012.jpg — (108.39 k)

Help with beetles, good people
Moscow region, Lukhovitsky district, Beloomut settlement, May 2011

You were lucky with the first one, Sasha! Congratulations to This Calosoma sp. True, I won't risk the appearance because I don't know them. But I'm sure they'll also say that the view in M. O. is in any case a good find in my opinion.
UPD: "Prointuichil" it seems: Calosoma (Calosoma) inquisitor (Linnaeus 1758)

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 09.01.2014 15: 18

And MO, Ramenskiy district, okr. platf. 41km on Kazanskaya railway, June 24, 2012.

Barbel Callidium violaceum and iris similar to Plateumaris braccata (Scopoli, 1772) uncertainly so-as I doubt and can still correct..

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 09.01.2014 15: 18

Help with beetles, good people
Moscow region, Lukhovitsky district, Beloomut settlement, May 2011

2 - Lixus bardanae

Barbel Callidium violaceum

This is not Callidium violaceum, but Callidium (Palaeocallidium) coriaceum (Paykull, 1800).

This is not Callidium violaceum, but Callidium (Palaeocallidium) coriaceum (Paykull, 1800).

Something in purple otdaet or a photo like that. And coriaceum is there, yes: he caught approx. there. Only it's pure black. That's why I thought about violaceum. c. coriaceum is also good luck, however.

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 09.01.2014 16: 02

And another bug from Beloomut, May 29, 2011

Pictures:

IMG_1349.jpg — (123.15к)

And another bug from Beloomut, May 29, 2011

Cleonis pigra

Something in purple otdaet or a photo like that. And coriaceum is there, yes: he caught approx. there. Only it's pure black. That's why I thought about violaceum. c. coriaceum is also good luck, however.

And I think coriaceum happens with a metallic sheen? bronze-green, not as purple as violaceum, and we have it much less often than violaceum. you may have a different address

And I think coriaceum happens with a metallic sheen? bronze-green, not as purple as violaceum, and we have it much less often than violaceum. perhaps it's different for you

coriaceum is more often brown, the low tide is weakly expressed (although it happens). There is also Callidium (Palaeocallidium) chlorizans, which is kind of a synonym for coriaceum - here it is bronze-green. Coriaceum, in my opinion, is rare and sporadic everywhere. I myself have only one copy in the collection, collected in the Uglich district of the Yaroslavl region.

coriaceum is more often brown, the low tide is weakly expressed (although it happens). There is also Callidium (Palaeocallidium) chlorizans, which is kind of a synonym for coriaceum - here it is bronze-green. Coriaceum, in my opinion, is rare and sporadic everywhere. I myself have only one copy in the collection, collected in the Uglich district of the Yaroslavl region.

I once exposed this beetle here just under Callidium (Palaeocallidium) chlorizans, I was told that it is a synonym.

I once exposed this beetle here just under Callidium (Palaeocallidium) chlorizans, I was told that this is a synonym.

As far as I understand, it's about this definition?

1-Yes, this is Callidium (Palaeocallidium). Since chlorizans is now considered a synonym for coriaceum, you have coriaceum ..
.

Still, there is a need for clarification, because here:
http://ashipunov.info/shipunov/school/book...renburg_obl.pdf
they are specified as separate types.

As far as I understand, it's about this definition?
Still, there is a need for clarification, because here:
http://ashipunov.info/shipunov/school/book...renburg_obl.pdf
they are specified as separate types.

Yes, that's it. But the source you cited at the end of chloricans (p.113) says that the situation with taxonomic status is not clear and requires additional research. Perhaps there is a situation when some are isolated as separate species, others are reduced to synonyms, I think it's better to ask Mikhail Danilevsky

However, if the situation isn't clear, then that doesn't mean they should be treated as synonyms yet.?

Here on the site: http://www.cerambycidae.ru/content-view-1.html
or the answer on the forum explicitly states that these are synonyms. But this was written some time ago...
And the document for 2012 already says-not clear

However, if the situation isn't clear, then that doesn't mean they should be treated as synonyms yet.?

Here on the site: http://www.cerambycidae.ru/content-view-1.html
or the answer on the forum explicitly states that these are synonyms. But this was written some time ago...
And the document for 2012 already says - it is not clear

I can't say that anymore. I know that according to relatively old determinants there are both one and another names in the rank of independent species, so I still had confusion about them back then.
Let the experts say

One more point: on the site http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=114569
Callidium chlorizans is neither a species nor a synonym.
Did this mean (given the (supposed) spread of chlorizans from the Urals and further east) that the authors of the Fauna Europaea site considered Callidium chlorizans to be an independent species absent in Europe?

Probably you don't need to guess, but write to the forum authors, and then discuss it.

And I think coriaceum happens with a metallic sheen? bronze-green, not as purple as violaceum, and we have it much less often than violaceum. perhaps it's different for you

Here is my coriaceum: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...dpost&p=1338305
It was also bought in 2012 for 4 train stops closer to Moscow in the same Kazan direction and probably on the same clearing under the power line . As you can see, there is no low tide there. True, Iogu can't say anything about the variability, since this is an isolated find. In general, to find this beetle-good luck in Moscow in my opinion.

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 10.01.2014 21: 00

Here is my coriaceum: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...dpost&p=1338305
It was also bought in 2012 for 4 train stops closer to Moscow in the same Kazan direction and probably on the same clearing under the power line . As you can see, there is no low tide there.

Well, then, here's mine: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...ndpost&p=937645
Low ebb observed Collected: Yaroslavl region, Uglich district, mixed forest in the area of the YarSU biostation, on a sawn dry spruce, 03.07.2009.

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 10.01.2014 21: 41

Well, then so is Zinin
http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/coleoptera/eng/calcorjk.htm
In my opinion, my photo also shines.

C is also quite rare in Belarus.
(Palaeocallidium) coriaceum Paykull, 1800. [Solodovnikov, 1999a]. Gor., Vit. It is extremely rare and local in Belorussky Poozerye. Gorodoksky district, Verechye village, on fern leaves, near a warehouse of logs of pine, spruce, aspen, birch, h = 179 m, 55034 '40.96" N / 30022’43.30 " E, 11.06.2010, 1 male. Vitebsk district, Pridvinye village, 13 km West of Vitebsk, spruce forest, 06.1990, 1 male; 4 km South of Vitebsk, Luchesa River bank, pine-spruce forest, in the web, 01.08.2003, 1 male. 11.06 – 01.08.

This post was edited by I. solod - 11.01.2014 03: 55

Well, then so is Zinin
http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/coleoptera/eng/calcorjk.htm
In my opinion, it also shines in my photo.

All sorts of different May beetles

1. 27.04.2013
MO, Mytischinsky district, Manyukhino village
Can Ampedus be identified?
Ampedus pomorum?
[attachmentid()=191440]
[attachmentid()=191441]

2. 02.05.2013
MO, Railway
Aphodion of some kind
[attachmentid ()=191442]

3. 05.05.2013
MO, Krasnoznamensk
pretend
[attachmentid ()=191443]

4. 02.05.2013
MO, Railway
Uloma rufa?
[attachmentid()=191444]

5. 02.05.2013
MO, Railway
in mushrooms
[attachmentid ()=191446]
[attachmentid()=191447]

6. 10.05.2013
MO,
Where was Dalopius marginatus born
?
[attachmentid()=191449]

7. 05/10/2013
MO, Railway
to light
[attachmentid ()=191450]
[attachmentid()=191451]

8. 05/11/2013
MO, Railway
on a birch
tree looks like Glischrochilus, but something makes me even rows of dots confused?
[attachmentid()=191452]
[attachmentid()=191453]

9. 12.05.2013
Moscow Region, Krasnoznamensk
Tachyporus ?
[attachmentid ()=191454]
here you can see the "fork" on the ass
[attachmentid ()=191455]

10. 13.05.2013
MO, Railway
station on light
[attachmentid ()=191456]

11. 05/17/2013
MO, Railway
to light
[attachmentid ()=191458]

12. 05/17/2013
MO, Railway
to light
[attachmentid ()=191459]

13. 18.05.2013
MO, Railway
to light
[attachmentid ()=191461]

10. 13.05.2013
MO, Zheleznodorozhny
na svet

Helophorus tuberculatus I believe. Envy

11. 17.05.2013
MO, Zheleznodorozhny
na svet

Hydroporus ? neglectus

10. 13.05.2013
MO, Zheleznodorozhny
na svet

Helophorus tuberculatus I believe. Envy

11. 17.05.2013
MO, Zheleznodorozhny
na svet

Hydroporus ? neglectus

Are the furrows now a separate family or, as before, a subfamily of water lovers?

Are the furrows now a separate family or, as before, a subfamily of water lovers?

In last year's revision of Hydrophilidae, A. Short and M. Fikacek left everything as before, i.e. Helophoridae is a separate family. I tend to trust leading specialists.

All sorts of different May beetles
8. 05/11/2013
MO, Railway
on a birch
tree looks like Glischrochilus, but something about the even rows of dots confuses me?

Ipidia binotata Reitter, 1875

Please help me identify the beetles: all those taken in the summer in the north of the Rivne region.

Pictures:

col_1.JPG — (146.01к)


col_2.JPG — (313.89к)


col_3.JPG — (434.24к)


col_4.JPG — (454.19к)


col_5.JPG — (325.89к)


col_6.JPG — (249.3к)

Please help me identify the beetles: all those taken in the summer in the north of the Rivne region.

In order:
1) Chrysomela vigintipunctata
2) Cassida viridis
3) Stenurella bifasciata, female
4) male Stenurella melanura/bifasciata (to accurately determine the color of the abdomen: red - bifasciata, black-melanura).
5) Stenurella melanura - самка
6) Hippodamia tredecimpunctata

according to staffs from the Ministry of Defense:
the first 2 photos are Bledius, probably B. gallicus.
then 2 Tachyporus obtusus,
then Acidota crenata. Years to light is not typical, probably sat on the canvas by accident.

Please tell me who's who. Dzerzhinsk, Nizhny Novgorod region
1-Rhagium (Megarhagium) mordax ? Length 24 mm. 14.06.2008. In bulk on flowers in riverine meadows
2-Rhagium (Rhagium) inquisitor ? Length 14 mm. 05.10.2008. Under the bark of a dry pine tree, the female appears to be pot-bellied
3-Rhagium (Megarhagium) sycophanta ? Length 25 mm. 13.06.2009. Oak Grove
4-sycophanta ? Length 18 mm. 05/11/13. On the railway pole

Pictures:

1.jpg — (68.45к)


2.jpg — (86.79к)


3.jpg — (102.98к)


4.jpg — (76.85 k)

Please tell me who's who. Dzerzhinsk, Nizhny Novgorod region
1-Rhagium (Megarhagium) mordax ? Length 24 mm. 14.06.2008. In bulk on flowers in riverine meadows
2-Rhagium (Rhagium) inquisitor ? Length 14 mm. 05.10.2008. Under the bark of a dry pine tree, the female appears to be pot-bellied
3-Rhagium (Megarhagium) sycophanta ? Length 25 mm. 13.06.2009. Oak Grove
4-sycophanta ? Length 18 mm. 05/11/13. On the railway pole

1) sycophanta
2) inquisitor
3) sycophanta
4) mordax

both are from Transbaikalia. sorry for the quality. disgusting lighting

This post was edited by Evgeny Ribalchenko - 14.01.2014 02: 34

Pictures:

IMG_5698.JPG — (327.04к)


IMG_5694.JPG — (297.1к)

then Acidota crenata. Years to light is not typical, probably sat on the canvas by accident.

I am such (or very similar (I confess I did not define)) collected in bulk on DRL lamps that illuminate our architectural monuments...

Well, if you find an opportunity, take a photo and post it. This information is interesting, we have Omaliinae come to light only by chance, and you may be able to determine your own.

according to staffs from the Ministry of Defense:
then-Acidota crenata. Years to light is not typical, probably sat on the canvas by accident.

I am such (or very similar (I confess I did not define)) collected in bulk on DRL lamps that illuminate our architectural monuments...

Well, if you find an opportunity, take a photo and post it. This information is interesting, we have Omaliinae come to light only by chance, and you may be able to determine your own.

He accidentally flew to the seventh floor.
Relatively often small brown staffs arrive at the light, but they are too small and nimble for my soap box