Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Asias halodendri pirus Arakawa 1932

Thanks!

Can you help me with the Greek beetles?

1. Eulasia pareyssei?



2. Chalcophora sp.? Probably still detrita-in Greece it is often found.



This post was edited by Double A - 17.06.2008 21: 21

Three more strange animals.

1 - Cyphon, 2 - Kateretes, 3 - Carpophilus s.l.

  
1-some kind of dazitida-yes
2-probably holevina... perverted - no, perverted cryptophagid-myrmecophile, I forgot the word... Ah! Catopochrotus crematogastri, a glorious thing

Well, I already understood it, but where else was it from, except for Transcaucasia? Can you tell me?
And I don't like" dazitida " as a dazitida anymore. Isn't it Melirida?

> where else was there, except for Transcaucasia? Can you tell me?
-"I don't remember. but since the beetle is more of a desert than a forest beetle, and it exists on one side of the Caspian Sea , it must also exist on the other, like the paussid and the Khan's tarsier, let's say
"dasitida"...isn't it Melirida?
-"call it a pot.".. It's all the same to me. supraspecific taxa are merged and scattered five times a day, which is ninety-nine percent a matter of taste. or ninety-ten. I care about this only insofar as sometimes you have to look for a bug at the address - in the book especially (in the net slavaBo this problem is not present). if tomorrow the Bolsheviks rename her lane up to Buloshnaya to Krasny Zor, and beyond Buloshnaya to Blue Zor, there will be confusion at first, but then we will get used to it.

Help with identifying beetles in Moscow and the region (Odintsovo district)
This one is found in Moscow, about 5 mm, flat and with paws "diggers".
1a.
1b.
This one looks like softball, but not him.
2a.
2b.

1-Hololepta plana (Sulzer, 1776), it seems
2-nutcracker Denticollis linearis (Linnaeus, 1758)

Beetle:
I was digging through old photos, accidentally came across Exocentrus from the Crimea
post: 22.03.2007 20: 33, page 11.
" Barbel from the Crimea. Caught in a train car when I got there smile.gif (27.07.2006 Sevastopol) "
Exocentrus punctipennis Mulsant et Guillebeu, 1856

Pygidium:
it turned out quickly! Did you use it from memory or did you check it? Most of the species were indeed undefined.
Can I use your last name and initials for the labels? I won't write pygidium det

Can you tell me if this is Xylotrechus rusticus (Linnaeus, 1758)?

Pictures:

P6180006.JPG — (309.95к)

Dinusik, very similar

Thank you, Mr. Double A.
The photo was probably taken in the vicinity of Macedonia? No doubt I could tell you exactly if I saw the male's aedeagus. I take it you haven't collected these beetles?"

Thanks!

This photo is taken in Macedonia, but similar ones fly to Thessaly. In general, a fairly common beetle there.
I don't collect anyone, just take photos

A couple more questions. All photos were taken in Greek Macedonia.

1. Is this a banal Mylabris quadripunctata or is there someone else like it?



2. Agapanthia cardui or pannonica?



3. Larinus sturnus? A big elephant on a thistle.



This post was edited by Double A-06/18/2008 15: 33

Double A:
based on the idea of distribution and appearance of pannonica. More precisely, only specialists will say, we are waiting for KDG and Cerambix

Dinusik:
Soon you will know all the barbels perfectly well

  
-"call it a pot.".. It's all the same to me. supraspecific taxa are merged and scattered five times a day, which is ninety-nine percent a matter of taste. or ninety-ten. I care about this only insofar as sometimes you have to look for a bug at the address - in the book especially (in the net slavaBo this problem is not present). if tomorrow the Bolsheviks rename her lane up to Buloshnaya to Krasny Zor, and beyond Buloshnaya to Blue Zor, there will be confusion at first, but then we will get used to it.

Basically, so. But "one" - "not one", and I want to define it. For now, I'm leaning towards Anthodromius.

 
2. Chalcophora sp.? Probably still detrita-in Greece it is often found.

Yes, it looks like detrita.

Bronzes. Greece.

1. Protaetia sp.? M. b. angustata? Is it possible to determine by photo?



2. Apparently, Oxythyrea cinctella? When I shot it, I thought it was funesta, so I didn't pay enough attention to it, which I regret



This post was edited by Double A-06/18/2008 17: 35

last name and initials for labels...

No, that's not how it's done. When you check the definitions , you will sign your own names. These are just tips. label - a document that can only be signed with your own hand while holding a copy.

To Bolivar
thank you so much for editing my notes - so much better, of course. please forgive my carelessness - I looked at the forum by accident, I didn't have time to understand those.subtleties, I just became curious about what the local people are rich in, but I decided to sign something along the way for fun. All the best.

A few more from Israel:

First the barbel:

1. Agapanthia ? (Smaragdula) lais


2. Phytoecia ? (Musaria) sp.


And the abscess,? Alosimus syriacus rauterbergi

...I'm leaning towards Anthodromius.

Honestly , I have no idea. I don't know much about what's on the flowers. You must have noticed it yourself. You know better - you're a pretty good judge of beetles, as I've seen from even the most cursory perusal of the local pages. As for me-I'm just sharing my general impression with you-I think I liked the finds of 4 ... God forbid the memory... one glorious edemerid (Sparedrus), some kind of torn colobicus, agyrtes, and your ant catopochrot (although I happened to catch it)
here are a number of useful photo sites that are worth a walk at your leisure - there are decent beetles: http://www.koleopterologie.de/gallery/index.html; http://www.biolib.cz/en/gallery/dir6/; http://claude.schott.free.fr/index_coleo.html; http://www.golddistel.de/kaefer/index.htm (she also has some nice bedbugs); http://www.galerie-insecte.org/galerie/fichier.php (it is very stupid, but the material is useful); http://www.latridiidae.de/genus.htm
Some or all of this is probably already familiar to you, but just in case.
if anything -- write vmarfus < dog>gmail. com

Good day, ladies and gentlemen!
You shouldn't have put the bronzes here, Mr. Double A... It was better to put them in the appropriate topic.....

By type.
The former may well be P. (P.) angustata angustata(Germ.) ab.nasutaGerm. [???], but since this is not a picture to identify a, as they say:
" - Dans la nature sur les fleurs", and even, it seems, a female-I do not dare to say exactly what it is. If you need precise definitions, always try to tune in the next time you travel so that any object that comes into your frame is immediately eliminated afterward. And then, later, you can take normal photos for identification. In most cases, you need to act only in one way and in no other way.
UPD
The next snapshot. Yes, it is very similar to the view you specified. But it can also be O. cinctelloidesReitt., and this is already a shame!

This post was edited by Nimrod - 06/18/2008 22: 53

On Saturday (14.06) I was in the cemetery and under the bark of an old birch tree,
rotten, I caught 2 such beetles. According to the "green", Abdera from
Melandryidae was obtained. But I never got to the view... Tell me, who is this
thing?

If you need precise definitions, always try to tune in the next time you travel so that any object that comes into your frame is immediately eliminated afterward. And then, later, you can take normal photos for identification. In most cases, you need to act only in one way and in no other way.

In order not to turn photohobby into collecting invertebrate corpses and (oh, my God!) However, it is sometimes necessary to neglect the accuracy of the definition, especially when it concerns details that are not particularly visible even to the eye armed with a macro-lens camera. C'est la vie...

But for the work on the definition of "... ces insectes dans la nature sur les fleurs " I am very grateful to everyone!

Please help me identify zlatka

Pictures:

P6160173.JPG — (277.79к)

To Dinusik: Agrilus ater (Linnaeus, 1767) ...I think so, although it may turn out to be Agrilus biguttatus (F., 1777).

This post was edited by Buzman - 06/19/2008 12: 05

Agrilus sp. something close to biguttatus, but clearly not her

I'm back with the Greek beetles, but there aren't many left

1. Kuzka some Anisoplia sp. Maybe zwicki?





2. I didn't find it at all. 20-30 mm, in the mass ran on the sand. At least give me a tip...

Pimelia sp.

Pimelia sp.

Most often there is a subglobosa found, similar like. The vertex prong won't help?



3. Also chernotelka any? Size 10-15 mm



This post was edited by Double A-06/19/2008 15: 04

Dear DublyA, My opinion on pimelia is not subglobosa. It's an imported beast, and I don't know much about imported animals. The second darkling - even Rod couldn't think of anything. Maybe Milabris will help?

Dear DublyA, My opinion on pimelia is not subglobosa. It's an imported beast, and I don't know much about imported animals. The second darkling - even Rod couldn't think of anything. Maybe Milabris will help?

Well, thanks for that, too. Imported beetles have run out, we will wait for Mylabris'a

Bronzes. Greece.

1. Protaetia sp.? M. b. angustata? Is it possible to determine by photo?



2. Apparently, Oxythyrea cinctella? When I shot it, I thought it was funesta, so I didn't pay enough attention to it, which I regret

Angustata

Agrilus sp. something close to biguttatus, but clearly not it

Rather still ater.

On Saturday (14.06) I was in the cemetery and under the bark of an old birch tree,
rotten, I caught 2 such beetles. According to the "green", Abdera from
Melandryidae was obtained. But I never got to the view... Tell me, who is this
thing?

What size is the animal? How does Hallomenus fail?

One of the barbels?

Pictures:

P1050838.jpg — (139.58к)

To KingSnake: No, this is someone from the Oedemeridae I suspect that the female is Oedemera femorata Scopoli, 1763

This post was edited by Buzman - 06/19/2008 19: 41