Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Pages: 1 ...716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724... 986

Likes: 1

24.02.2016 20:02, Арунас

- Very good pictures! You can see the scales! Just don't understand - how this could be done on 18-105 (I have the same lens)? - Or are you screwing up the macro-attachment?
I doubt that you will use autofocus extension rings. Well, if you can't see any aberrations, it means that either the nozzle is expensive , or you are working with manual rings... "But the second one, as I can see, is out of the question, since you didn't use the flash." Discover the secret - don't get bored!

Thanks

There is no secret

about the Nikon D7000 camera and the Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 G AF-S IF-ED VR II Micro lens

I don't need any rings. Tripod, branch holder, pult and so on

And where do you see that ispolzuyu 18-105 ? I don't have

a current objective

Likes: 1

Likes: 2

Likes: 1

Likes: 2

Likes: 1

01.03.2016 21:32, Андреас

Thank you very much! The Internet slows down; nothing is written about the second one in Russian. In appearance, they are almost identical, although the main external visual difference (judging by the pictures with Latin captions) is the "pattern of his fur" on the dorsal part of the chest.
And with its taxonomy, the devil will break his leg. - Here is what na went on the forum of spider lovers: "Actually, the leghorn is the European subspecies Hyles lineata, which some authors tend to distinguish as an independent species. The taxon Hyles lineata itself is native to North America, but Hyles lineata livornica is really cosmopolitan, living throughout Africa, most of Asia, up to Australia."
And in Sochi, I photographed this one. And despite the ambivalence of interpretations and synonymous names, I hope it can be called Hyles livornica?

Pictures:
picture: 23.09.2015.JPG