Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

On the previous page, a certain mega-swamp is mixed at the bottom, where, if you search for a long time, you can still find a leaf wrapper in defocus. But this photo art is for very rare connoisseurs.

You just pass it through, no need to be silly. Anyone who needs it will find it on megafloat, and even tell you where to dig from a blurry drawing.

As a variant of Rhyacionia buoliana

Thank you, but no. Judging by the genitals, this is something from the tribe Archipini, probably from the genus Clepsis. It's just that I didn't find such a form of genitals either in Razovsky or in other sources, I re-combed everything. I also didn't find such a wing pattern. In some confusion so far, it seemed to me that a butterfly with such bright wings would clearly be immediately identified by me. I will try to make better photos and photos of genitals. But the question of placing images here leaves much to be desired, until I have mastered it or some kind of failure during loading (for me personally).

The broken soap dish didn't allow you to crop the edges of the photo, either?

Here the storage is full, and the administration doesn't care if you don't uploador something to it. Moreover, such an unjustifiably gigantic size.

akulich-sibiria, Passing by blatant wrong things that are easily corrected is counterproductive. A remark is a socially useful thing, if you perceive it as an incentive to correct the plucking, and not as a blood grudge.

as a result, my animal was found, purely by the shape of the male's genitals, and then by the description of the wings. However, I haven't found an image of this type on the Internet yet. This is Aphelia disjuncta (Filipjev, 1924)

The broken soap dish didn't allow you to crop the edges of the photo, either?

Here the storage is full, and the administration doesn't care if you don't uploador something to it. Moreover, such an unjustifiably gigantic size.

akulich-sibiria, Passing by blatant wrong things that are easily corrected is counterproductive. A remark is a socially useful thing, if you perceive it as an incentive to correct the plucking, and not as a blood grudge.

Once again, my business is how to spread. This isn't an art gallery. I took a photo and sent it. You still didn't say anything productive here, except for the ulcer. If you want aesthetics, go to the Hermitage.
I needed a result, in fact, this photo can be recognized, I don't need another one.
For me, it is better if a person sends here in order to get an answer, and not with the phrase "what a beautiful butterfly, tell me what it is", while he will forget what he was identified and why he needs such information. Although this is also a matter for everyone. We don't have any criteria for uploading photos here. In terms of size, I think I explained it. I'll figure out what's wrong.

And it's up to experts to scroll horizontally in search of a leaflet, or scroll vertically down the page past this horror to the next message. From my personal experience, many people will choose the latter. And if someone watched from mobile phones with limited traffic, then they also paid money for this pixel eruption.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RbUgn_bXOs

The post was edited by ENO-05/08/2024 14: 07

And it's up to experts to scroll horizontally in search of a leaflet, or scroll vertically down the page past this horror to the next message. From my personal experience, many people will choose the latter. And if someone watched from mobile phones with limited traffic, then they also paid money for this pixel eruption.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RbUgn_bXOs

Anyone who needs it will scroll through it.
The conversation can be endless. I wrote above, I will understand.

Once again, my business is how to spread.

Attention! PLEASE READ IT IF THIS IS YOUR FIRST TIME COMING HERE

Anyone who needs it will scroll through it.

How much is needed? Most experts identify other people's insects not so much because they need it personally, but as a volunteer help to the questioner.

How much is needed? Most experts identify other people's insects not so much because they need it personally, but as a volunteer help to the questioner.

Well, I assume you're an expert on wasps and ants, but not on lepidoptera? I've probably had about a thousand photos here already, and I didn't have any complaints about your groups either. What's bothering you? One photo that I posted here in a hurry and didn't crop. I've already explained everything. They made a comment to me, and I'll try to figure out how to upload compressed photos. Well, it didn't work out, now what??
As for specialists, it's not just volunteer work. Many people take information about finds and put points on the discovery of certain species. This is a huge benefit, since you can't cover Russia yourself any more, and here people can actually help. This is one of the advantages. In addition, through the forum, we managed to find specialists with whom there were good articles. And if your help is limited to volunteering, then why are you sitting here?

This post was edited by akulich-sibiria - 13.05.2024 19: 52

And someone else? A business based on identifying insects or something?

Well, yes, I'm not a butterfly man. What does it change? If I saw a similar photo of a wasp or an ant, I would probably scroll down without scrolling to the right. I do about the same thing regularly with hundreds of similar mega-pages on iNaturalist, because there they are deadly slow to load: as long as you look at one such SHIDEVR of an artist who fundamentally despises cropping, you can determine a dozen normal photos of other authors.
What other compression that didn't work out? Focus, or crop the margins? I repeat: you will not be able to upload photos to the forum, regardless of the size, no one has been doing this for a long time. Although, if you really have 1000 similar panels uploaded here before, then by deleting one, you will be able to upload a dozen cropped photos, but only if you act very quickly, because the released space is mysteriously hiding before your eyes. In any case, the complaints were not about the method of posting, but about the object itself.

Go to your group and view what you want and how you want.
And I appreciate your teasing and teasing. I think this is not a group where you need to measure the number of languages. Now I understand some of the participants that you "throw out" ))

Aphelia disjuncta

And this is your Aphelia disjuncta


This post was edited by vidjl-05/16/2024 19: 27

Aphelia disjuncta

And this is your Aphelia disjuncta

I think it is! It fits the male's genitals . Unless of course there is a close view ))

In the determinant, where this view will lead, it is indicated that the drawing is blocking, but judging by the location of spots and the darkening of the outer edge, this is exactly this view.))

Where did you get the capture of this instance from? )

Where did you get the capture of this instance from? )

I didn't catch the copy, Gorno-Altaisk city district.

What about molbiol ? Completely covered up? They write access is limited and for a long time about a month exactly.

Nikolai, in general, nothing has changed with Molbiol, but I have heard similar reviews from some users that it does not open. It probably depends on your geography (where you access the Internet from), but I don't know the details.

Just went to molbiol, everything is normal, it works.