Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Likes: 1

09.02.2024 21:20, vidjl

On the currant possibly firefly Ephestia kuehniella

Thanks!
I compared it. Somehow not very similar to Ephestia kuehniella - this "good" we have a lot, and this firefly surprised me with an unusual pattern, and - in the photo is not very visible-some slightly bluish-lilac tint. Although, probably, they do not have a particularly stable pattern? While I was looking through the options, I thought: can't it be Euzophera cinerosella?

I thought so at first, but the butterfly's summer time is different, Euzophera cinerosella flies from May to August, and here you write about October. Bigger photos would be better, maybe the second generation. But I don't have that information.

This post was edited by vidjl-09.02.2024 21: 26

Likes: 1

Likes: 2

Likes: 1

06.05.2024 12:40, Matvey Markhasin

In support of the author of the photo!
Sorry, but it's boiling!
Unfortunately, I'm not a connoisseur of flyers, but the butterfly can be seen on the top five!
But it is precisely because of such "lovers" of high-quality photos that I never publish anything of my findings and observations here again. I limit myself to only rare messages. To love nature, explore, discover new things, collect a collection and be able to photograph professionally-this is not a necessary combination in one person. Well, I don't know how to take photos with high image quality. And I don't need it. And I am sure that there are quite a few people like me even here. But many people would probably be interested to see photo illustrations for certain messages. But there is always a character who is ready to humiliate these photos. And I don't want to and I won't humiliate myself.
But I will say separately, if you don't like it, don't look. But I am interested to see a lot of even the most defocused photos of nature, insects, and especially butterflies.
Such " critics "are one of the reasons that this forum is"bent".
Once again, I apologize to everyone for my maybe harsh tone.

Likes: 3

07.05.2024 19:43, akulich-sibiria

On a one-hundred-point scale

It's not about aesthetics. Even fuck it with focus, although if a person is simply unable to focus the lens on the subject of shooting, this is -100500 in the photographer's karma. But posting a photo in this form without cutting 95% of the extra frame area around the butterfly is already a blatant disrespect for viewers.

I didn't mean to offend anyone. In general, I don't understand why my photo caused so many negative emotions. I had only a broken soap dish at hand, and I steamed with a butterfly for a couple of hours, I couldn't figure out what kind of birthmark it was. I don't post photos very often now, and I'll probably do it even less. We needed options based on definitions, not lectures on what and how to post and take photos. At first, there were generally about 10 posts with links to the photo, while I was learning how to place the photo correctly, I managed only this scale, I couldn't attach compressed photos. Force majeure, which I tried to explain to you.
Once again, I apologize for such quality and scale, I hope the critics are done with this - are you done?
Sincerely.

Pages: 1 ...980 981 982 983 984 985 986