E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

With regard to blogs and communities

Community and Forum → Website news and updates → With regard to blogs and communities

Peter Khramov, 09.10.2014 0:51

Quite a long time has poreshali that ought to open access to a blog entry for all users zaregalsya. Probably with postmoderatsiey (ie moderation after publication). But in this situation need to blog in a separate subsection Communities disappears.Then correct to extend the functionality in the main sections of the Community (with the publication of pictures, videos, formatting, etc.) Then blogozapisi can be done in sections - both existing and newly added for this case. For example, long ago it suggests "Reports / impressions about the trips / expeditions." Ieall past and future blogozapisi distributed by sub-communities where they will be easier to find and comment on.
Who that thinks about it, thus expanding community without their own blog? What other areas offer besides reports?

Comments

09.10.2014 8:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Keep. To expand, it is necessary. Although, if for no other, personal reasons, that "Yandex pics" I have accumulated quite, no one is clear, except myself debris. (Any screenshots etc.). More has the idea (for a long time want to offer): it is necessary to open a new, technical section on the establishment and maintenance of entomological collections.That section, rather than a single theme, in which all the blame.
What matters is that it's all on you enough :)

09.10.2014 9:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin

I would definitely zabatsal, and with razdeleniem- family-clan-view

09.10.2014 12:30, Peter Khramov

Section "Entomological Collection" has long been in the Community. That section, and not the subject.
Definition - did not understand. On page foty are all determined by what else could be the definition? Ile definition without ph, the descriptions of verbal? ..

09.10.2014 12:56, Shamil Murtazin

Vasily probably had in mind the text of FAQ's type, with krossylkami :)
And Dmitry - something like a determinant as insektamo.

13.10.2014 11:03, Peter Khramov

About FAKov - too early, more important it becomes when a lot of information, and it can be lost. And here in three topics can be 80% of the entire description, and most importantly, no one else at all did not begin to write.
Qualifiers can only be specialized by otedlnym taxa.This is done in the "projects", and not even so primitive as to makuliney, but the primary need infa.
And so - "Catalog & Co»

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2025.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.