E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Butterfly on an ancient mirror

Community and ForumTaxonomy. ClassificationButterfly on an ancient mirror

Greykhan, 02.04.2010 13:48

Good day to you, dear forumchane. I am puzzling over the image of butterflies on an ancient Chinese mirror. let's say the plot is isolated and completely uncharacteristic
user posted image

help us determine what kind of view it is... I assumed that this is some kind of hawk moth, depicted in the middle of bee cells with honey, by analogy with the death's head hawk moth. are there any species of hawkmoth in Primorye or Transbaikalia that feed not only on nectar or plant juice, but also on honey?
Sincerely yours, Sergey

Comments

Pages: 1 2

02.04.2010 13:51, Dmitrii Musolin

this may be a silkworm, from the cocoons of which silk was obtained. there may just be an ornament around, not a honeycomb...

02.04.2010 14:00, omar

I think it is silkworm

02.04.2010 14:07, Greykhan

more info. The mirror belongs to the northern Song Dynasty. at this time, the expansion of China by neighboring peoples took place-from the north-east of Khitan, from the north-west of Tangut.

02.04.2010 14:09, Greykhan

I also thought about the silkworm in the first place, until I saw the butterfly, which is like a bomber... please visually hrakterizovat on some characteristic features...

02.04.2010 14:17, Dmitrii Musolin

does it look like a ballerina here? this is stylization. There is no SUCH butterfly in nature. Starting with what is depicted as 2 wings in total...

02.04.2010 14:20, omar

Another thing that comes to mind is that lamplighters are relatives of cicadas, if you look at the shape of the body and recognize the formations in front and behind the body as significant.

02.04.2010 14:22, Greykhan

Okay, but let's think again, who could it be? I just have a different field of competence, so I expect to get an exhaustive and, if possible, competent answer from you...
sincerely

02.04.2010 14:23, Greykhan

I went to see lanterns:))
once again I will talk about the region - Northern China, southern Primorye and Transbaikalia...

02.04.2010 14:30, omar

I apologize, I saw the inscriptions at the bottom of the photo only now. shuffle.gif The pattern around the butterflies looks exactly like a pattern, not a honeycomb. Maybe some kind of carpet or bedspread.

02.04.2010 14:34, Ekos

Stylization, of course, is very strong, but I agree with my colleagues, assuming that this is a silkworm (Bombyx sp.). It definitely does not look like a hawk moth. But it is impossible to determine exactly these butterflies.

02.04.2010 14:37, Ekos

Moreover, the silkworm in Ancient China played an important role – silk was extracted from its cocoons – a kind of currency at that time. And some species that did not have economic significance, as it seems to me, would not be depicted.

02.04.2010 14:52, Greykhan

by pattern... the fact is that this is a pattern for us now-just a pattern, but in the past there was nothing random. each pattern carried a certain semantic load. there is a pattern - wind, waves, birch branch, bear's ear, dovetail. and its application or application should have been appropriate. it's like now Dynamo fans would wear the inscription on the Dynamo scarf, and under it was the emblem of Spartak. I exaggerate of course... in the case of the silkworm, it doesn't actually host its larvae(is that what it's called?) geometrically ordered? but the honeycombs of the same bees are arranged in the form of multiple hexagonal cells, just like the pattern on the mirror.
in general, - it is impossible to determine?

02.04.2010 14:57, Greykhan

dear Ekos, the fact is that the mirror is just uncharacteristic for China... it lacks their style elements and ornamentaliki. only the general form with a wide shoulder. I also want to know if it is possible to determine the ethnic influence on the "Chinese manufacturer"by the habitat of this species:)

02.04.2010 14:58, Dmitrii Musolin

silkworm caterpillars were sitting on branches, but already in ancient China, as far as I remember, it did not live in the wild, but only on farms, on racks. If the ornament is not accidental, then it is most likely the honeycomb of a honey bee (there are no more insects that contain larvae like this). But there is no connection with the butterfly (except that both species are domesticated insects).

More precisely, no one will determine you from such an artifact just based on the image.

02.04.2010 15:02, Greykhan

I was hoping that SUDDENLY this is some kind of recognizable species and that the habitat region is stable, for example, tied to the place of growth of vineyards in the Amur region or something else... please understand correctly.

02.04.2010 15:03, Ekos

Well, what's the point of portraying a death's head if there were no accidents? After all, there are no reliable finds of butterflies from this genus in Transbaikalia and Primorye. It seems to give an example of Acherontia lachesis for the Southern Primorye, but this is very doubtful. And even if a few death's head individuals had flown into these parts, what was the point of depicting them on household items? Moreover, they would not cause any harm to beekeeping... and benefit too. In general, you are right, the stylization is very strong, you can not determine what it is, everything is only at the level of speculation...

02.04.2010 15:08, Greykhan

That's why I asked about Brazhnikov... if we still assume that these are bees, and they were already there, as well as developed beekeeping or bortnichestvo. plus, the geometric ornament in the center is interethnic (however, like many types of ornaments) and means a "SOWN FIELD" (here, of course, questions also arise).
so maybe there is some kind of butterfly in Primorye that still feed on honey? Like the Death's Head hawk moth in Central Asia?

02.04.2010 15:11, Greykhan

according to the seaside hawk moth, I found such information that Tatarinov's hawk moth lives there( and they refer that the biology and method of nutrition are not studied) and the eastern ocular hawk moth, plus 2 more species, whose names in Latin I did not remember.

02.04.2010 15:12, Greykhan

in general, some questions. thank you to the participants for the discussion, I will leave for a while.
I will be glad to communicate

02.04.2010 15:13, Ekos

I told you, there are NO butterflies in Primorye that feed on honey FROM HONEYCOMBS. And the data of individual authors on finding a dead head (A. lachesis) we have extremely controversial issues.

02.04.2010 15:15, Alexandr Zhakov

And if everything is simpler, and this is a stylized image of a bee, well, very stylized. Although, the eyes correspond more to the bee, and not to the butterfly.

02.04.2010 15:17, Dmitrii Musolin

it seems to me that people would not portray an economically or aesthetically unimportant appearance on the works of Dec.the arts. A dead head would not pull (it is not only in Central Asia, but also in the Leningrad region).

02.04.2010 15:18, Dmitrii Musolin

I was thinking about the bee, too... but the wings are more like a butterfly... maybe not a silkworm, but just a nice butterfly...

02.04.2010 15:19, Alexandr Zhakov

Bees arriving at the "SOWN FIELD" produce honeycombs-honey.

02.04.2010 15:21, Ekos

according to the seaside hawk moth, I found such information that Tatarinov's hawk moth lives there( and they refer that the biology and method of nutrition are not studied) and the eastern ocular hawk moth, plus 2 more species, whose names in Latin I did not remember.


There are about 30 species of hawk moth in Primorye, but none of them feeds on honey from honeycombs. They prefer flowers mainly, sometimes-fermented sap of trees. The biology of the Tatarinov hawk moth (Callambulyx tatarinovi) and the eastern eye moth (Smerinthus planus) is well studied and they do not pierce the combs with their proboscis in search of honey. And if you take honey released from honeycombs and exposed in an open place (for example, in troughs), then almost half of the region's butterfly fauna will flock there (and this is hundreds, I'm not afraid, thousands of species – - butterflies love sweets:)) And if honey also ferments – then there will be a crowd here in general – lepidoptera with a developed proboscis do not disdain alcohol:)

This post was edited by Ekos-02.04.2010 15: 24

02.04.2010 15:27, Tigran Oganesov

My first thought when I saw the photo was cicadas. It may well be.

02.04.2010 15:34, Ekos

In general, the puzzle is still the same… Knowledge of entomology alone is not enough. You need a very good knowledge of the history, culture (especially art) and economy of Ancient China.

02.04.2010 15:37, Greykhan

but none of them feeds on honey from honeycombs.

I heard it, thank you.

02.04.2010 17:04, Aaata

I'm all for cicada. Purely external similarities are most common.

"Death's head", as a migrant flies and now in those parts, including the south of Primorye, and in those days, it is possible that this could be commonplace. Of course, the species is different, not European, and originates from Southeastern Asia, most likely Acherontia styx, which is recorded up to 48 degrees N (Rolf Reinbardt and Kurt Harz: Wandernde Schw(a) rmerarten, 1989). A. lachesis is less likely, but not excluded. The master could even display it under the impression of a one-time meeting, not necessarily something that occurs every day or is economically significant.

And stylization largely depends on the individual vision of the artist. Especially if it does not have a traditional canonical character, and here, apparently, this is the case. If there are no similar works, there is still divination.

This post was edited by Aaata - 02.04.2010 18: 45

02.04.2010 17:09, vasiliy-feoktistov

Honey from the honeycomb feeds (from hawkmoth) Death's head (Acherontia atropos Linnaeus, 1758) - its proboscis is underdeveloped. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

02.04.2010 17:21, okoem

And if everything is simpler, and this is a stylized image of a bee, well, very stylized. Although, the eyes correspond more to the bee, and not to the butterfly.

I agree. Four bug-eyed bees and a honeycomb.
The wings have stylized veins, but there is no pattern, i.e. it looks like a hymenopteran. There are two wings - the bee also has two of them to the unsophisticated eye.
To depict an anonymous butterfly next to a honeycomb, and even more so a lamplighter - what is the point? And a bee is a respected insect. smile.gif

02.04.2010 17:29, Yakovlev

These are cicadas, I think... at least it's more like them than anything else. It doesn't look like anyone else...
Agree with Omar and Bolivar

02.04.2010 17:42, Dmitrii Musolin

I will not agree on cicadas.... cicadas fold their wings "house" (and this is a sign (under)of the order Homoptera). of course, it wasn't drawn by an entomologist, but cicadas in the East (both in China and Japan) are charismatic insects, they were known about them, they were able to draw them.

hawk moth and even more so the destroyer of honeycombs do not belong in the picture, and I do not understand where this version comes from...

silkworm or bee (but the similarity with the latter is minimal).

03.04.2010 0:45, Damone

I wonder what the mirror's age is...
Both cicadas and silkworms are highly symbolic of Chinese culture. The cicada is a symbol of the transience and finiteness of life. Also, I've read that they've been a treat since ancient times.
There's nothing to say about silkworms.
But as for the bees - honey, of course, was eaten. But in addition, bee stings were treated.
In general, all 3 elements are symbolic.

If we assume that those drawings in the central part of the composition - a circle of 6 dots and a dot in the middle-are flowers, then perhaps these are bees flying to the flowers...

03.04.2010 0:56, Yakovlev

Almost in the subject. My friend Pyotr Ustyuzhanin read an article about the art of the Bushmen. It was written that the bushmen are filigree depictions of both real and mystical animals. To illustrate the first, drawings of rhinos and elephants were given, and the second-a filigree FAN-WING! Cool!

03.04.2010 1:48, Papaver

more info. The mirror belongs to the northern Song Dynasty. at this time, the expansion of China by neighboring peoples took place-from the north-east of Khitan, from the north-west of Tangut.

Why do you think this subject is Khitan or Tangut? Bronze mirrors of this type, as I recall, date back to the heyday of the Jurgen Empire.
Likes: 1

03.04.2010 3:20, Ekos

I'm all for cicada. Purely external similarities are most common.

"Death's head", as a migrant flies and now in those parts, including the south of Primorye, and in those days, it is possible that this could be commonplace. Of course, the species is different, not European, and originates from Southeastern Asia, most likely Acherontia styx, which is recorded up to 48 degrees N (Rolf Reinbardt and Kurt Harz: Wandernde Schw(a) rmerarten, 1989). A. lachesis is less likely, but not excluded.

Give specific evidence supported by collectible materialwink.gif, they probably just don't exist. In the new catalog of lepidoptera of Russia edited by S. Yu. Sinev (2008), Acherontia lachesis (Fabricius, 1798) is indicated for the south of Primorye. But again, on what basis – it is not clear.

03.04.2010 7:44, Aaata

Give specific evidence supported by collectible materialwink.gif, they probably just don't exist. In the new catalog of lepidoptera of Russia edited by S. Yu. Sinev (2008), Acherontia lachesis (Fabricius, 1798) is indicated for the south of Primorye. But again, on what basis – it is not clear.

A link to the original literary source is provided. Questions to the authors.

03.04.2010 10:09, Greykhan

I wonder what the mirror's age is...

Time of the Song Dynasty 960-1279 AD.

Pages: 1 2

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.