E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Offer Site

Community and Forum → Discussions on the website functionality → Offer Site

All the rest posts on: new features

Pages: 1 2 3

01.10.2015 12:40, Shamil Murtazin

In the right column at the bottom is the "Latest updates" extreme and three modified species. Here I would like to see more of these kinds of "novoizmenёnnyh"

07.10.2015 6:58, Anatoliy Kuzmin

It would be nice to be able to subscribe (mail messages) to comments to your photos and to override. I did not find this here.

07.10.2015 19:52, Peter Khramov

Shamil, simply choose in the Catalog order by Last Update, and here you are: All updates feed: https://insecta.pro/catalog?order=dt
Anatoly, yes, there are such plans. In the meantime, you can use a compromise — the section "My Subscriptions" in the community: https://insecta.pro/community/my

11.10.2015 22:50, Shamil Murtazin

I see no point to the time of the update, but I still needed a simple tool. Thank you for the clarification! )

Addition: we can somehow change the order of withdrawal? Two columns with a zigzag output = breaking eye when viewing a large number of species in order.Options: first conclusion from the top down in the first column, and then follow-up with the top of the second column is also top down. Option 2 - just one very long column.

11.10.2015 23:48, Peter Khramov

Shamil, later made configurable output.

14.10.2015 5:07, Yuri Semejkin

I have a question about a personal message - inbound and outbound!. Something I have not seen the ability to delete messages or data is not provided?
While incoming and outgoing bit, there is no problem. In the case of accumulation, it becomes uncomfortable, have to use the sliders to spend time searching for the right.Peter! Could you envisage the possibility of users do not need to remove, leaving only what they see fit for the correspondences?

23.10.2015 14:49, Evgeny Komarov

Georgia started the pictures of the collection of material and immediately felt "dry" a copy of the eye / ear "cuts". I propose to substitute "collector's item", or "a copy of the collection." And what if there is dry, then reported to be still wet :)

23.10.2015 15:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Eugene, like: has long been the most eye cuts.
The question has been raised: https://insecta.pro/gallery/42996
Keep.

23.10.2015 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov

I have no ears, no eyes does not hurt :) dry it is dry. Is it worth it in the collection, or sfotografiran on the windowsill or on the roadside. Seriously though, the name suggests suitable for all occasions.
You can certainly say that not everything in the photo zhivie deystviteno live there, what exactly is wet inside.If you have dry, that is, the wet - alive or not alive, but still wet. Alternatively, the dry specimens at all that does not write. Photo living insect (in nature) and a photo of all other states.

23.10.2015 16:45, Evgeny Komarov

Alexander, and your version is good enough! When shooting a living object - indicate, and the rest do not. It is logical and less poking buttons that :).

23.10.2015 16:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Alexander, is that you in fact.
Because the collection is not holding, and does not hurt you.
Dmitry, Eugene and I still like cuts (((
How to imagine how much work and effort is behind this - of the collection ......
So cuts uniquely :)
And your proposal is also supported: it is better not to write anything at all in such cases.

23.10.2015 17:05, Alexander Belousov

A, if the copies. smoothing (dry) but without the labels (many do not recognize such copies. collector) how to write? Or even from a bag. But the picture is! What then?
I think the option "just a photo" just will. A collector, has to write in the comment to the photo.

23.10.2015 17:12, Evgeny Komarov

Well, there has been a consensus seems to be: living (in nature, cage, babochkovom garden and other) point, and other options - do not write. Peter, how are you?

23.10.2015 17:23, Alexandr Zhakov

Basil, I keep a collection like no collection, I do not collect :))
I raspravki quality photos and much more eye cuts than the label underneath. :(

23.10.2015 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Well then, why there are no photo collection?
I just label in a collection is more important and discussed the inscription under the photo on the website, rather than the quality of raspravki.
In many serious collections of material and does not smoothing and this collection does not lose its value.

23.10.2015 18:18, Alexandr Zhakov

We are moving away from the topic of discussion.

23.10.2015 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov

That's it.
And the inscription "Dry instance" ........
It is better to do without any labels, rather than with the :)

24.10.2015 0:44, Peter Khramov

Dry / crude - is not just a sign or a note, it is a sign by which to select the photos. Therefore, both values ​​should be to call. The meaning of this division:

1. Shooting in nature (whether or not in the nature of, and in the barn / apartment) live cockroach or a truptsa but truptsa "estesstvenno origin." Now it is on the website called Living / Alive.
2.Shooting caught for collection / research instance. Although the unfolding, though not. Now it is on the site called Collection / Pinned (previously dry).

And in Russian and in English I do not like these options because they do not clarify the essence of 100%. If you have any suggestions on how to improve - well. And yet - the lesser of two evils.

24.10.2015 8:04, Anatoliy Kuzmin

I would claim 1 divided into two parts, "the wild" and "Captive". A paragraph 2 on the "dead" and "Collection". I think - this will solve the problem of identifying the subject.

24.10.2015 9:27, Evgeny Komarov

Anatoly, to illustrate the taxon is not important, filmed live insect "in the wild or in captivity," and it is important that this insect has a natural color, often - a characteristic pose, etc. With all the love Basil to collector's item :) - many species are in the collections considerably unlike ourselves live.That's why you need to separate the living and the expanded-dried for a collection, or just take pictures.

24.10.2015 10:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov

There is willy-nilly, the question of the jackdaw another "Staged photo" (for "live" insect).
It is no secret that many photographers before-how to make a picture of the pre-podmarivayut object because that live it off is not possible.And in what conditions are placed at the same insect which it is given position - depending on the photographer.
Therefore it is necessary to take into account this point.

24.10.2015 13:23, Peter Khramov

Moments should take into account the comments and notes to the photos. A collector / live - a formal indication that A) is necessary for the selection of ph and B) should be clear to the largest possible number of users.

24.10.2015 16:21, Anatoliy Kuzmin

Peter! The problem then will be, because that staging photo (made in captivity) in the comments indicate no (99%), and the nature of the discrepancy can be huge. For the selection of pictures to be formalized as the attribute. Personally, I, of course, it is, but in science, I think, is important.And as for the dead / collector I think so - I shoot sometimes these items, but do not collect and do not save. So, I think this feature should be formalized for clarity.

24.10.2015 17:12, Evgeny Komarov

Anatoly for photos here, "the drum" How to get a picture with a lively and natural color of the insect. It is important that it is a living without color change. What is the difference in the cage or in the meadow? Appearance is not changing, after drying, etc. We did not photosite where the fault with the staged shots.

24.10.2015 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Under staged shots, I mean something that can not, for example, the dung beetle or purely podkornik or beetle living in the trees and feeds on tree sap to sit on flowered not given him this nature.
That's why it is necessary to indicate that the snapshot staging.A painting is a sign of too volatile to make it focus :)

24.10.2015 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov

Basil, well, here it is impossible to come up with 100% foolproof. Well dung will be put on a flower, so what is that ecology, bionics and Etalogiyu studying the photos - no. So what does the background photos? None whatsoever. Do not create problems where none exist.

24.10.2015 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Alexander, this I mean that the photo in nature, except for color insect must pass more and way of life of this insect by the plot.
Otherwise, should be taking notes.
It is desired.
And "no court no ', as they say;)

24.10.2015 22:52, Peter Khramov

Formalized values ​​characteristic will have two. The rest infa - in a note (you can appropriate recommendations when loading or help add). But the question of how to more successfully to call these values ​​- is relevant. Will thought - necessarily write.

25.10.2015 7:04, Anatoliy Kuzmin

Well, most of the time concerned only the transfer color, and you can simply call - "The natural color of the insect" and "other cases" do not know when or if you know exactly what the color has changed.

25.10.2015 18:17, Peter Khramov

Anatoly, the meaning of attribute values ​​I explained above (10.24.2015 0:44). The product colors are not to blame.

26.10.2015 12:35, Anatoliy Kuzmin

Now I think that with the signs still worse. Symptoms are described (24.10.2015 0:44), but their purpose (10.24.2015 13:23) is not clear. What kind of photos you can take away? When live insects, there because Claim 1 includes the non-living. If the photo in nature, not as Staged in captivity and are also included in item 1. If you need a photo collection, either, because in step 2 enter and collected only for photo copies. Etc.So before you look for the name of the signs, I think, need to articulate objective selection of them, then you can specify them and descriptions will be clear only after the name. So far as I understand from the comments, everyone understands it is ambiguous. Reject, but think.

26.10.2015 15:23, Peter Khramov

You can simply select the gallery foty on this basis now. And the difference will be visible without any further explanation. If there foty that it is unclear where to refer - let references discuss.

26.10.2015 16:31, Anatoliy Kuzmin

Select on the basis of easy, I write about weak goal selection of which constitutes priznaki..Dopustim, you can list the targets of selection: 1. The selection of photos from the collection of the samples 2. Selection of photos of samples with unaltered color photos 3. Selection of samples in a natural environment and position, etc.After approval of the objectives drawn up a set of (1 - 4) signs for the decision goals, is a description of each and give them names. What is now possible to select on the grounds, I noted above - 10/26/2015 12:35

27.10.2015 14:44, Peter Khramov

Anatoli, about the selection, I wrote to the fact that, well, if at all left a man will go to the gallery, and he will not understand what this feature is selected for it, it is intuitively quite a understand (at least in general terms) what it was.
About values.In the gallery of the vast majority of images - a picture straightened copies of entomological collections or shooting live insects under natural conditions. Accordingly, by the discussed feature, we first separate the one from the other. Wherein:
1. In both options crawl and some left foty.Type zamorennyye life setting or dead insects in nature. And God bless them. Their number is very small, and if the person meets this photo, nothing terrible will happen, just skip it and everything.
2. The user may need selection of similar features (such as a live / dead), and then it will be more difficult.
And at the same time:
3.A large number of characteristic values ​​and explanations to it once again confuses and scares foty how to load and view them. Given all this, I believe that values ​​have this feature should be only two, even if they do not fully meet 100% of photos on the site, but only 99.Actually, the name they are unlikely to come up with a good, but if you come up with - good.
ZY About the same sign as such, they regularly use (seen in the statistics), but because he
A) as such need.
B) it is useful in its present form.

27.10.2015 16:23, Anatoliy Kuzmin

Peter! Yes, for God's sake, let it be like to be, but to address the specific objectives of the three mentioned by me quite three signs. But if we leave two goals, the two, but the features naturally change slightly. No I do not insist on anything, if there is no desire to make a qualitative selection, then it is not necessary, especially since no one interested in the improvement of selection.

27.10.2015 16:40, Peter Khramov

And what is the third? If the natural color - it will train lightly at all. Or not?

27.10.2015 16:59, Anatoliy Kuzmin

"natural coloring - it is quite serious Well"
10.24.2015 17:12 Evgeny Komarov - It is important that it is a living without color change.
10/24/2015 9:27 Evgeny Komarov - it is important that this insect has a natural color

27.10.2015 18:09, Peter Khramov

Anatoly, Eugene meant that sometimes collectible items can lose / change color. That is, for example, a live cockroach is always blue, and dried - always pale lousy.But in this case it is obvious it is not necessary to mold the excess value of the flag, and simply indicate in the comments to the photos, they say, look, here it is not quite as it should be. In addition, the distortion when shooting has often come and live nasekomyshey, especially with metallic color. Like here: https://insecta.pro/gallery/45377.And comments in such cases, of course, very desirable.

27.10.2015 19:23, Anatoliy Kuzmin

Peter! I do not choose the target selection. It solved without me, I can make signs on selected targets.

28.10.2015 15:45, Anatoliy Kuzmin

Something complete silence society on the targeting selection of photos. Continue. If to select two objectives: (1 Selecting photos from the collections of samples. 2. Selection of photos of samples in the natural surroundings and pose.) Which, as I understand, Peter almost agree - then such signs "Insect on a photo in the collection" for the selection of targets and the first "Live insect shot in the wild" for the selection of the second goal. The remaining photos are no indication as their selection is not required. If the will be other proposals for the purposes of the selection of photos, signs offer another option for selection.

Pages: 1 2 3

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.