Incorrect funny definitions of insects in the literature and on the web

clearly, the Chinese buy for pennies

And the Chinese? They rob their own nature, buy it from someone else, or still breed something? I'd never heard of captive breeding of scorpions, but I'd never really been interested in breeding arthropods.

The Chinese don't care what they rob or who they rob - their own nature, other people's technology, or fake chicken eggs. if only the profit was here and now.

From China, vestimo...
Again, from the previous page I didn't see what was already marked.

I still think that mass types are sealed up in key chains, which are very problematic to lime in this way.

This post was edited by Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg - 15.01.2010 19: 26

I don't know if all this is caught in nature.. Some are probably bred. Scorpions. for example, exactly bred. But I don't know if they're adjustable.

And so I really liked the idea - I saw ads on TV a couple of times. Why not promote it? The main thing is to have less nonsense in the magazine..

For some time now, it has become very "fashionable"to pour insects into epoxy resin. I have already been brought such souvenirs more than once both from South-east Asia and from former socialist countries!? Moreover, the beetles are 100 from Southeast Asia... Clearly everything is collected in nature! And these damn Chinese damn and we otchudili-in the suburbs of Penza have become rare frogs! It turned out that these gavriks calmly catch them in various ways... Local fishermen even chased these hunkhuzs a couple of times... Finally obarzeli...
At the expense of the incorrect definition of insects-very often, and even unfunny when such errors pop up even in popular science literature. And what about newspapers!?? I have already sworn off communicating with local journalists, it seems that I will check everything in their writing, but no , they even manage to write SUCH a thing in the title of the article... here recently comes one with a number of questions about insects living next to humans (synanthropes). I literally chewed everything up for her, brought her a draft of the interview... I checked it out and gave it the go-ahead. I buy the next edition of the newspaper and what do you think I see right away!? You know what the article was called IN ITS VERSION - "Cockroaches in the Red Book"....

This post was edited by Bolivar - 18.01.2010 11: 48

 
I still think that mass types are sealed up in key chains, which are very problematic to lime in this way.

I agree.
For the layman, there is no difference in what is embedded there, in the sense of rarity/mass character. And the manufacturer needs a low cost price. Thus, either simple non-overhead breeding, or the same simple mass collection.

The value of popular literature can be high even with a large number of errors in it can be valuable for recruiting new fans, improving the attitude to insects. If these people are interested , they will get to the bottom of the truth themselves from specialists or from serious literature.. And as for ordinary readers who just like to pick up magazines, it seems to me that it doesn't matter what is written there, because half of it will still fly by.

Chukovsky rules!
That's how it really was.
taken from here:
http://www.yaplakal.com/forum2/st/0/topic266344.html

Pictures:

post_3_12638586126905.gif — (335.99к)

For some time now, it has become very "fashionable"to pour insects into epoxy resin. I have already been brought such souvenirs more than once both from South-east Asia and from former socialist countries!? Moreover, the beetles are 100 from Southeast Asia... Clearly everything is collected in nature! And these damn Chinese damn and we otchudili-in the suburbs of Penza have become rare frogs! It turned out that these gavriks calmly catch them in various ways... Local fishermen even chased these hunkhuzs a couple of times... Finally obarzeli.............................
here recently comes one with a number of questions about insects living next to humans (synanthropes). I literally chewed everything up for her, brought her a draft of the interview... I checked it out and gave it the go-ahead. I buy the next edition of the newspaper and what do you think I see right away!? You know what the article was called IN ITS VERSION - "Cockroaches in the Red Book"....

Eh...I won't want to go to Penza soon (a couple more similar messages).

I saw such a thing (just with a scorpion) once in a person as a keychain, on the keys. He brought this case from the army (they themselves caught scorpions, solpugs and filled them with some kind of crap as a souvenir), and he served when the USSR was still there. So this is not new at all.

Ha-ha... And also very fashionable in the 70s knobs on the speed switches.

I saw it as a keychain

In the topic "Incorrect funny definitions", "keychains" are also very "funny"
M. B., "trinkets"?

Ha-ha... And also very fashionable in the 70s knobs on the speed switches.

First of all. Live technologies however .

In the topic "Incorrect funny definitions", "keychains" are also very "funny"
M. B., "trinkets"?

Colloquially-do you want me to fix it?

Colloquially-do you want me to fix it?

"Leave it as it is" @ V. V. Rozanov

Unfortunately, under the influence of man, nature inevitably changes, sometimes almost irrevocably-the construction of a house, road, stadium, etc., etc. And as a rule, a person tends to put everything into action... We have already cut down half of the forests, and the governor recently said -...the region annually does not cut down half of the business forest... First, it remains to finish cutting the last one and we will not be a forest-steppe but a hemp-steppe. Although they do not leave any stumps, they buy a tractor attachment in Chuvashia and it cuts any stump to dust!

That's what they are terrible insects, and even a family
http://home.damotvet.ru/gardening/194060.htm

Quote: "There are more than a million different varieties and individuals in the insect world, and only a few of them are useful and not dangerous to humans. On the contrary, the vast majority of insects have a reputation as pests of human gardening activities. "

Ai-yai-yai-how can you do that?

Quote: "There are more than a million different varieties and individuals in the insect world, and only a few of them are useful and not dangerous to humans. On the contrary, the vast majority of insects have a reputation as pests of human gardening activities. "

Ai-yai-yai-how can you do that?

Another moron, their darkness and do not count their numbers... Around entomology in particular.

I read it: I can still see the picture: professional bee fighters break into the apiary, immobilize the beekeepers and start destroying the hives...

From the book by Yu.Dmitrieva "Man and animals"

Pictures:

dmitriev1973.jpg — (85.89к)

Although a person mostly writes for children(al), but still consulted with someone? How can you call a panorama a rider? Truly: Not funny, but sad. How do we teach our children?

Although mostly a person writes for children(al)

That's exactly what's for kids!!! Who are we raising?!

after a nuclear disaster, no one will care how the riders differed from the scorpion girls

after a nuclear disaster, no one will care how the riders differed from the scorpion girls

So then there will be no one to read the books, but now we need to distinguish them

after a nuclear disaster, no one will care how the riders differed from the scorpion girls

IMHO, approximately 99.999% of the population still doesn't care.

IMHO, approximately 99.999% of the population still doesn't care.

I agree, and it's sad. I want at least the right books. By the way, Dmitriev's Journey for Life is one of my first books.

make friends with humor ))

Anyone who has unnecessary free time, I suggest you visit the website "Photos of wildlife" by Sergey Pivovarov:

"The study of butterflies is the purest of all sciences. For it is hard to think of a more useless occupation."

- "The Argus pigeon (Plebejus argus Linnaeus 1758, ~ P. idas Linnaeus 1761, ~ P. argyrognomon Bergstrasser 1779, etc.) is a widespread and very common species, second only to Icarus in its total number.... If the underside is not visible, Argus can be confused with Icarus."

- "view is a subjective concept determined by the researcher's intuition"

http://www.beercooker.narod.ru

Anyone who has unnecessary free time, I suggest you visit the website "Photos of wildlife" by Sergey Pivovarov:

Funny, I even found a couple of my own photos there!

Another quote from the same place :D:
"Specialists distinguish a lot of varieties, of which Plebejus argus, P. argyrognomon and P. idas are worth mentioning. Males of P. argus are characterized by a broad black border on the upper side of the wings. P. argyrognomon is slightly larger in size. At the same time, the size of red spots and the width of the fringe in P. argyrognomon are the same as in other Arguses, so the pattern as a whole looks smaller, and the fringe-as if shorter. For P. idas, a number of signs are mentioned, none of which work: darkening of the veins from the edge to the wing root (in males of other Arguses, the veins are usually darkened from the wing edge to its third or to the middle), small light strokes or a solid light field between the red spots and the "roof of the house" on the underside of the hind wing. males (females have this lightening in all Arguses), increased "eyesight" (5-6 large blue eyes on the underparts), etc. "

In the book" Scoops of Ukraine", in the color tables under number 177, Cucullia umbratica is depicted instead of Cucullia dracunculi.

Pictures:

DSC02483.jpg — (842.07к)

Anyone who has unnecessary free time, I suggest you visit the website "Photos of wildlife" by Sergey Pivovarov:
http://www.beercooker.narod.ru

The style of presentation of the material is quite original The day at the university today turned out to be a shitty one-at least this page pleased me!
It was nice that the authors of the photos were mentioned. It's good.

I decided to post it here. The picture is funny )
http://www.0chan.ru/b/src/12648873441869.jpg

I decided to post it here. The picture is funny )
http://www.0chan.ru/b/src/12648873441869.jpg

How lovely!

I decided to post it here. The picture is funny )
http://www.0chan.ru/b/src/12648873441869.jpg

If it doesn't work, they'll find it by smell

I remember you told me about experiments on wasps, it reminded me ))
What, the smell will find this particular flower bed? 0_o And if it is destroyed or watered with some substances?

They will find this flower bed if they have dragged it away nearby, for them the smell is very important. If they destroy it, they won't find it.
But if you do not use flowers, but a solution of sugar without smell, they will not find it.

I decided to post it here. The picture is funny )
http://www.0chan.ru/b/src/12648873441869.jpg