When was it better to do science in Russia?

No way, no way... You can't replace a natural drive with pills - the result seems to be there, but the sensations are different...

Learn the Mayakovsky chant ("Left March"): "the right one is tired-work left, left, left!"
V. V. promised both "drive", and "result", and, even - "oschuscheniya".

What kind of pills do you use to increase your interest in science? forbidden, I suppose?"

Is it suggested to shift the sampler to your left hand?

Axe

  

Russia, probably (like Cambodia, Uganda, Penguin, etc.), is not adapted to "science". Or vice versa: science - to Russia (hooch-so, hooch-so, verti...). As a "private matter", - so it is please, - as much as you want. And in an institutionalized form, - so, you Fig...
Under the" tsars "Mendeleev was not accepted as an "academician" (see Butlers), under the Bolsheviks (and-and them!) it is known who was "not taken" (V. Vernadsky is a "mysterious" exception here; yes, it is possible with such a son...); and ush patom, vaapshche , is fse izvesna...
Kagda? (a topic question). Nikagda.

And Turkey or Egypt, which is better adapted?

And Turkey or Egypt, which is better adapted?

and that these two countries are a "klondike for doing science"? and the number of scientists who are suffering to engage in scientific activities in these countries is so great that the transport and other systems of these countries cannot cope with their influx, and therefore they have to swim, walk, and make their way "to the storehouse of scientific thought of all mankind"?

BUT still, they are not Uganda and not Penguin
I want to say that you have gone too far in comparison