E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Rare insect fossil reveals secrets of evolution

Community and ForumOther questions. Insects topicsRare insect fossil reveals secrets of evolution

Vladimir Matveev, 08.02.2011 8:31

Researchers recently discovered the ancestor of a group of large, carnivorous, 100-million-year-old cricket-like insects that are still alive and live today in areas of south Asia, northern Indochina and Africa. A new species found in a limestone fossil bed in northwestern Brazil corrects the misclassification of another fossil of this type and shows that the genus underwent very little evolutionary change since the Early Cretaceous Period, the time of the dinosaurs, before the breakup of the largest continent in ancient times, Gondwana. This information is described in a research paper published in the open access journal ZooKeys.

"The Schizodactylidae or club-footed crickets are an unusual group of large, terrifyingly predatory insects and are directly related to the true crickets, great green grasshoppers, and Orthoptera grasshoppers," explained University of Illinois entomologist Sam Heads, lead author of the Natural History of Illinois Study. "They got their common name from their large, paddle-shaped protrusions on their feet, which served them as support for their large bodies as they moved among their sandy inhabitants, searching for prey."

Although the fossil clearly differs from the club-footed crickets of the modern species, the general characteristics of the insects do not differ much, according to the head of the study, pointing to the fact that the genus has been in an "evolutionary stasis" for at least the last 100 million years.

Other studies have determined that the area where the fossil was found was likely dominated by a dry or semi-dry monsoon climate during the Early Cretaceous Period, " indicating that the environment of preference for insects of the Schizodactylus species changed slightly after more than 100 million years."

Original (in English): Sciencedaily.com Translated by M. Gonchar

A source: http://globalscience.ru/article/read/19120/

Comments

08.02.2011 9:06, amara

It's just a pity that there is no DIRECT link to the ORIGINAL article (in English), but only to the magazine, and you yourself need to "pick out" its quirks.

I wanted to see where the expression "in evolutionary stasis" came from, most likely from the English "stasis". This word, back in the 60s, was translated into Russian as "stasis" (when translating the story of the late American writer R. Sheckley).

08.02.2011 12:59, Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg

a masterpiece of machine translation?
"limestone fossil bed", "research paper" and, of course, "clubfoot crickets"!

link to the job
http://www.pensoft.net/J_FILES/1/articles/...-G-3-layout.pdf

This post was edited by Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg - 08.02.2011 13: 11
Likes: 4

09.02.2011 20:54, RippeR

Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg:
could you be more specific about "discovering the secrets of evolution", otherwise I didn't understand something from the translated material? Surely you know about these creatures?

15.02.2011 9:44, Bad Den

a masterpiece of machine translation?
"limestone fossil bed", "research paper" and, of course, "clubfoot crickets"!

Not at all-professional translator smile.gif

15.02.2011 13:21, Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg

Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg:
could you be more specific about "discovering the secrets of evolution", otherwise I didn't understand something from the translated material? Surely you know about these creatures?


I'm sorry! I will reread the article and try to comment, but I am not an expert on the taxonomy of Ensifera.

15.02.2011 13:26, Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg

Not at all-a professional translator smile.gif


When I buy a "science" movie, I always choose a CD with the original text. I just can't remember a disk with a normal translation!

15.02.2011 20:54, Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg

I reread the article. A representative of the modern genus Schizodactylus is described from the Lower Cretaceous deposits of South America. Previously, the beast was identified incorrectly. Schizodactylids (or schizodactylins) themselves are large creatures (Google them-there are plenty of photos of them on the web), specialized predators adapted to living in the sand. The group includes 2 modern genera, nominative, inhabiting the Middle East, Turkey, up to Northern India and ...? The second genus is known from South Africa. It is now clear that in the past the band's distribution was much wider, including the New World. Given the modern Capa beast, it doesn't look incredible. The second part of the paper is devoted to discussing the phylogenetic position of schizodactilids. Since I am not an expert on Ensifera, I will not discuss specific classification options. It may be noted that we see an example of a widespread situation: difficulties with the classification of very specialized forms. On the one hand, the animal is archaic (there is no particular doubt about this), but the strongest specialization makes it difficult to assess phylogenetic relationships. IMHO, this is exactly the situation when formally the cladistic analysis is "lame" - there is a very high risk that the signs of a life form (in this case, with a high probability of homoplasia) will "over-vote" the signs that carry phylogenetic information. Hence , it seems to me, the discrepancy in hypotheses about the systematic position of the group.

PS. I understand where the "club-footed crickets" came from! In the original, they are "splay-footed crickets", and the first meaning in the lingua for" splay " is oblique. True, the second value is advanced, but why read any further?
Likes: 4

15.02.2011 22:02, Pirx

The schizodactyl (or schizodactyl)species themselves


By the way, I wanted to ask - is "schizo" or "shizo" correct in such cases?
Likes: 1

16.02.2011 9:56, PVOzerski

"Schizo" is correct, of course , but almost no one follows it in such cases-from schizogony to schizophrenia.
Likes: 1

16.02.2011 12:48, Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg

So the language is dead. Therefore, only philologists and linguists know how to do it correctly. I have heard that the correct pronunciation should be "omo sapiens", because the first h is not read.

16.02.2011 13:02, Pirx

The genus of flies-sirfid Pipizella-once heard an American (sirfidologist) pronounce "pipizella".

16.02.2011 15:14, amara

So the language is dead. Therefore, only philologists and linguists know how to do it correctly. I have heard that the correct pronunciation should be "omo sapiens", because the first h is not read.


Maybe they don't know anymore, but in modern times this sound is pronounced as an exhalation

air and "almost" can not be heard. The degree of damage can vary.

I, for example, after 17 years of this sound-exhalation do not want to pronounce instead of X (gentle exhalation)arvard, that's a strange word for Harvard.

And such strange words for me are already a car and a small cart, Haydn, Homer (even in the 19th century in Russia they wrote Omer). smile.gif

This post was edited by amara - 02/16/2011 15: 24

16.02.2011 15:20, amara

The genus of flies-sirfid Pipizella-once heard an American (sirfidologist) pronounce "pipizella".


Yes, to spite the Americans, I always tried to pronounce " aegipti "(Edes, Aedes aegypti), and they always said "ejiptai".

But I took away from them a more convenient pronunciation of families, for example

"karAbide", not a boring karabI-Ide. smile.gif

16.02.2011 15:28, Yakovlev

Golubyanka-laisinide
Zeuzera-zoizera

16.02.2011 16:29, lepidopterolog

Yeah, and the Italians pronounce " s " as " h " - "chichindela", "chicada"...
I heard a story about a microbiologist who told at a conference about the enzyme of a certain "icoli", with an emphasis on the first "and", they asked-what kind of" icoli " is this? It turned out to be E. coli...

16.02.2011 16:37, Kharkovbut

Hiccup... smile.gif

16.02.2011 16:44, Pirx

Yeah, and the Italians pronounce " s " as " h " - "chichindela", "chicada"...
I heard a story about a microbiologist who told at a conference about the enzyme of a certain "icoli", with an emphasis on the first "and", they asked-what kind of" icoli " is this? It turned out to be E. coli...


Escherichia... But all our people still say "escherichia".

16.02.2011 16:48, lepidopterolog

Yes, many of us pronounce Aeschna as "eshna"! Horror...

16.02.2011 16:51, Pirx

Yes, many of us pronounce Aeschna as "eshna"! Horror...


"How scary it is to live!" (c)

16.02.2011 16:52, Pirx

Yeah, and the Italians pronounce " s " as " h " - "chichindela", "chicada"...
I heard a story about a microbiologist who told at a conference about the enzyme of a certain "icoli", with an emphasis on the first "and", they asked-what kind of" icoli " is this? It turned out to be E. coli...


So right, what-Tsitsolina? lol.gif
"How much is in your name" (c)

16.02.2011 16:57, lepidopterolog

"How scary it is to live!"

Even scarier when this creepy "secret" comes from the mouth of an invertebrate zoologist eek.gif

16.02.2011 17:14, amara

It's even scarier when this eerie "secret" comes from the mouth of an invertebrate zoologist eek.gif


I, and prisnoshu. Perhaps I can be forgiven, as not an invertebrate zoologist. But what is really necessary?

16.02.2011 17:18, amara

Escherichia... But all our people still say "escherichia".


In America, they say /rrɪkiə ˈkoʊlaɪ / E sh erikia kolai.

16.02.2011 17:21, lepidopterolog

I, and prisnoshu. Perhaps I can be forgiven, as not an invertebrate zoologist. But what is really necessary?

Well, personally, it always seemed to me that Eshna, Schistocerk, etcsmile.gif. it is clear that you can argue, remember about schizophrenia and schizonts, but still smile.gif

16.02.2011 17:30, amara

Well, personally, it always seemed to me that Eshna, Schistocerk, etcsmile.gif. it is clear that you can argue, remember about schizophrenia and schizonts, but still smile.gif


Out of curiosity, I found that " The name Aeshna was coined by the Danish entomologist Fabriziou. The name itself was the result of a misspelling of the Greek word Aechma, which means "spear". smile.gif

Yes, it also says that the "Aeschna" option is no longer used.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeshna

This post was edited by amara - 02/16/2011 17: 39
Likes: 1

16.02.2011 18:52, Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg

That's right, everyone pronounces Latin words according to the rules of their native language. But you can also show your education at the risk of being misunderstood.

At one time, I could not understand for a long time what "yusi'ka" is (emphasis on the long "and"), it turned out to be ootheca.

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.