E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Entomofauna of the Opuksky Nature Reserve

Community and ForumOther questions. Insects topicsEntomofauna of the Opuksky Nature Reserve

Pleco, 28.02.2012 10:15

Dear colleagues,

As part of the preparation of the Opuk Nature Reserve organization project, the faunal lists are being revised. The lists of species compiled by the reserve's staff need the greatest adjustment.
Of course, it would be possible to leave everything as it is, but I want to avoid outright "blunders".
If you have the time and desire, please make corrections directly to the text. Preferably, if available, with literary sources and an indication of the author of the comments. You can send comments by e-mail: pleco@i.ua

This is important in order to outline further directions of scientific activity in the reserve, and to justify the need for the existence of the reserve in principle.

I am sincerely grateful to all those who responded.

File/s:



download file ____________.doc

size: 189k
number of downloads: 1168






Comments

Pages: 1 2

28.02.2012 11:03, Alexandr Zhakov

I worked in this reserve twice-August 2003 and April 2004. Lists of arrows for the nature reserve's annals. They don't seem to be on this list. I couldn't find it right away, so I'll send smile.gifit to

28.02.2012 11:14, niyaz

The list of lepidoptera is weak.

28.02.2012 11:18, алекс 2611

I looked at leaf beetles and diptera. There are a lot of ridiculous typos. For example, the word Cryptocephalus is written in three different variants.
Likes: 1

28.02.2012 11:18, Pleco

Thanks! I would be very grateful!

About lepidoptera I agree, but in the mass of publications that are on the page of Voladimir Savchuk there was only this.
For example, more than 400 species have been recorded in the Kazantip Nature Reserve.

28.02.2012 11:21, Pleco

I agree, so far I have posted lists directly from the chronicles, but not everything is correct. That's why I ask for the help of specialists in groups, because it will take me much longer to check. Thank you.

28.02.2012 11:27, okoem

This is important to ... justify the need for the existence of a nature reserve in principle.

Someone liked the territory and are looking for a reason to abolish the reserve?

Follow the list. The catastrophically low number of butterflies is surprising. In one good May-June day, you could count more species than in that list. One kind of nymphalid, not a single whitefly? This is ridiculous.
In principle, if we extrapolate, then Opuka should be inhabited mainly by the same species as on Kazantip and on the entire Kerch Peninsula. At least as far as diaries are concerned.
On Opuka, I had a chance to collect only once, in the first days of May. The weather was cold and cloudy, and there were very few insects. Here's what I met:


Whiteflies Colias alfacariensis
Euchloe ausonia
Pontia daplidice (pictured by Semik)

Golubenki
Lycaena phlaeas
Aricia agestis
Polyommatus icarus

Thickheads
Carcharodus alceae
Erynnis tages


Papilio machaon sailboats

Nymphalids
Vanessa cardui

Satyrs
Coenonympha pamphilus
Lasiommata megera

Ursa
Major Arctia festiva

Scoops
Emmelia trabealis
Acontia lucida
Autographa gamma

Moths
of Lythria purpuraria
Cataclysme riguata

Lemoniidae
Lemonia ballioni

28.02.2012 11:35, Pleco

Vladimir, thank you very much!

There are two reasons : the organization's project is redone once every 10 years, and it has already been delayed; the second reason is that the borders have not yet been approved, this is for 12 years - the local councils do not want to coordinate it.
It is important to show that yes, there is a reserve, scientific work is underway, a lot has already been done, and there are also prospects for further development...
Likes: 1

28.02.2012 11:37, Pleco

And according to the list, from the literature I took only the one where the Opuk was indicated directly. On the other hand, this is a reason to conduct special research.

28.02.2012 11:55, PVOzerski

Typos in the list of erect wings are also unbearable. It feels like they scanned some paperwork, then "recognized" it with a computer program and didn't check the result with the original source.

Here is the corrected version.

Phaneroptera falcata – Common
grasshopper Leptophyes albovittata – Common
grasshopper Decticus verrucivorus – Grey
grasshopper Platycleis intermedia – Spotted
grasshopper Tettigonia viridissima – Green
grasshopper Melanogryllus desertus – Steppe
cricket Acrida bicolor – Common grasshopper Bryodema tuberculatum
– Broad – winged rattle
Saga pedo – Prairie
dybka Acrotylus longipes – Seaside filly
Calliptamus italicus – Italian Prus
Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa-Common bear

At the same time, for example, the ratchet is now transferred to the genus Bryodemella, and the actual species belonging to the acrid is a mystery.

28.02.2012 11:58, Pleco

I see, thank you so much!

28.02.2012 12:02, Pleco

As for what was scanned, it is quite possible - the first chronicles are only in the paper version, and this is what was sent to me from the reserve...

28.02.2012 12:26, алекс 2611

Cardiophorus rubripes Germ. and Paracardiophorus musculus Er. should be moved from goldfinches to nutcrackers.
probably Plagionotus floralis in barbels and probably
Gastrophysa polygoni in leaf beetles instead of Gastroidea polygoni (Linnaeus, 1758)
instead of Lithraria salicariae, it is better to use Lythraria salicariae (Paykull, 1800)
instead of Lobidostomis, it is better to use Labidostoma

in elephants, Trichosirocalus troglodytes (Fabricius, 1787)is better than Ceuthorrynchidius troglodytes
Coniocleonus nigrosaturatus Gz. replace with Coniocleonus nigrosuturatus (Goeze, 1777)

in sirphid flies instead of Spisyrphus balteatus Deg. better Episyrphus balteatus (De Geer, 1776)

28.02.2012 12:30, Pleco

Thank you, I'll fix it.

28.02.2012 12:31, алекс 2611

Yes, in sirphids, replace Heliophilus trivittatus F. with Helophilus trivittatus (Fabricius, 1805)
and replace Dsoctria engeli with Dioctria engeli Noskiewicz, 1953

This post was edited by alex 2611-02/28/2012 12: 34

28.02.2012 12:43, Pleco

Thank you, done!

28.02.2012 12:52, алекс 2611

 
instead of Lobidostomis, Labidostoma is better


Ahhh! my apologies! mol.gif
certainly not Labidostoma, but Labidostomis

28.02.2012 12:58, Pleco

OK! smile.gif

28.02.2012 13:08, Pirx

Grish, here is the ispr. and add. list of sirfids. Alex2611, however, was slightly ahead wink.gifof you Completely with its comments and bibliography, the list was sent to you on the soap.

1. Chrysotoxum festivum (Linnaeus, 1758)
2. Chrysotoxum intermedium Meigen, 1822
3. Chrysotoxum vernale Loew, 1841
4. Episyrphus balteatus (De Geer, 1776)
5. Eristalinus (Lathyrophthalmus) aeneus (Scopoli, 1763)
6. Eristalis (Eoseristalis) arbustorum (Linnaeus, 1758)
7. Eristalis (Eristalis) tenax (Linnaeus, 1758)
8. Eumerus tricolor (Fabricius, 1798)
9. Eupeodes (Metasyrphus) corollae (Fabricius, 1794)
10. Helophilus trivittatus (Fabricius, 1805)
11. Merodon albifrons Meigen, 1822
12. Merodon chalybeatus Sack, 1913
13. Merodon loewi van der Goot, 1964
14. Merodon nigritarsis Rondani, 1845
15. Merodon pruni (Rossi, 1790)
16. Merodon serrulatus Wiedemann in Meigen, 1822
17. Merodon tricinctus Sack, 1913
18. Paragus (Pandasyopthalmus) haemorrhous Meigen, 1822
19. Paragus (Paragus) quadrifasciatus Meigen, 1822
20. Sphaerophoria scripta (Linnaeus, 1758)
21. Syritta pipiens (Linnaeus, 1758)

28.02.2012 13:08, Alexandr Zhakov

Lists of insect species of the Opuk Nature Reserve 15-18. 08. 2003, more detailed (indicating the number and meeting places) transferred to the reserve in 2003, Latin slightly changed in the light of new trends 

Mantoptera-Mantis
Mantis religiosa
Empusa fasciata Brulle
Iris polystictica

Otr. Orthoptera-
Erect wings Saga pedo

Order Lepidoptera
Papilionidae-Sailboats
Iphiclides podalirius (Linnaeus, 1758)
Papilio machaon (Linnaeus, 1758)

Pieridae-
Whitefish Pieris napi (Linnaeus, 1758)
Pieris rapae (Linnaeus, 1758)
Pontia edusa (Fabricius, 1777)
Colias alfacariensis (Ribbe, 1905)
Colias erate (Esper, 1800)

Nymphalidae-
Vanessa cardui (Linnaeus, 1758)
Vanessa atalanta (Linnaeus, 1758)
Nymphalis io (Linnaeus, 1758)
Issoria lathonia (Linnaeus, 1758)
Argynnis pandora ([Denis & Schiffermuller], 1775)

Lycaenidae-
Lycaena phlaeas (Linnaeus, 1761)
Plebeius argus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Plebeius idas (Linnaeus, 1761)
Polyommatus icarus (Rottemburg, 1775)
Polyommatus bellargus (Rottemburg, 1775)
Polyommatus thersites (Cantener, 1834)
Aricia agestis ([Denis & Schiffermuller], 1775)

Hesperiidae-Thick
-headed Pyrgus armoricanus (Oberthur, 1910)
Carcharodus alceae (Esper, [1780])

Satyridae-Satyrs
of Melanargia galathea (Linnaeus, 1758)
Hyponephele lupina (Costa, 1836)
Coenonympha pamphilus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Maniola jurtina (Linnaeus, 1758)
Chazara briseis (Linnaeus, 1764)

Sphingidae
-Hawk Moth Agrius convolvuli (Linnaeus, 1758)
Macroglossum stellatarum (Linnaeus, 1758)
Hyles euphorbiae (Linnaeus, 1758)
Hyles gallii (Rottemburg, 1775)

Saturniidae-
Peacock's eyes Saturnia pyri (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

+ eardrum Xylocopa valga Gerst/

28.02.2012 13:22, Pleco

Thanks! I got everything.
I am happy to confirm the discovery of Iris polystictica,
but the presence of sand empusa there seems doubtful.
The material sent to the reserve, apparently, has sunk, and Semik, unfortunately, no longer works there.
It's good that the lists have been preserved.

28.02.2012 13:33, Alexandr Zhakov

I still have a copy of the report, but I can't find the electronic version. If necessary, I can scan it, but I think at this stage it is superfluous smile.gif

28.02.2012 13:52, Pleco

I agree.

28.02.2012 15:26, okoem

15-18.08.2003,
...
Plebeius idas (Linnaeus, 1761)
Melanargia galathea (Linnaeus, 1758)
Hyponephele lupina (Costa, 1836)

Idas? IMHO, not a very suitable place for it.

Galatea in mid-August? On yayla-yes. But in the steppe?
Was the flying yurtina or Lycaon mistaken for Lupin?

But the presence of sandy empusa there seems doubtful.

If so, it will be the first find for the Crimea,in my opinion ...
Likes: 1

28.02.2012 16:12, Alexandr Zhakov

  
Idas? IMHO, not a very suitable place for it.

Galatea in mid-August? On yayla-yes. But in the steppe?
Was the flying yurtina or Lycaon mistaken for Lupin?
If so, it will be the first find for the Crimea, in my opinion...

smile.gif
In the list: a rgyrognomon, was less common than argus (since I still haven't quite figured out argyrognomon and idasam), so I brought idas (what is in the Crimea)
About galatea in the report: "Single highly flown specimens. The time of observations is mid-August-not typical for the summer of this species, which is common in the Crimea in June-July"
Here is an error when transferring Latin, in the report:
Lycaon (Hyponephele lycaon Rott.)

About Empusa: the Crimean empusa mantis (Empusa fasciata Brulle) is not listed in category II of the KKU for the Kerch Peninsula. One specimen was recorded on the southwestern slope of Opuk. (in the photo report)
Thank you for your clarification. smile.gif
Likes: 1

28.02.2012 16:40, Pirx

  smile.gif
About Empusa: the Crimean empusa mantis (Empusa fasciata Brulle) is not listed in category II of the KKU for the Kerch Peninsula. One specimen was recorded on the southwestern slope of Opuk. (in the photo report)
Thank you for your clarification. smile.gif


Now I found in my old Crimean field diary: Opuk, May 19, 1996 1 copy. Empusa sp. (larva). The copy is probably still in the boxes somewhere.

This post was edited by Pirx - 02/28/2012 16: 41
Likes: 1

28.02.2012 18:16, okoem

The Crimean empusa mantis (Empusa fasciata Brulle)... not specified for the Kerch Peninsula.

I met him on Kerch repeatedly. But, much less often than in the mountainous part.
Likes: 1

28.02.2012 20:32, Dracus

Adding authors and families for mantises and erect wings:

Mantodea:

Mantidae:
Ameles heldreichi Brunner, 1882
or,with subspecies,
Ameles heldreichi taurica (Jakovlev, 1903) - Crimean
praying mantis Mantis religiosa (Linnaeus, 1758) - Common praying mantis

Empusidae:
Empusa fasciata Brulle, 1832-Striped
Empusa Empusa pennicornis (Pallas, 1773) - Pinnate Empusa - I also doubt its presence there, unlike E. fasciata

Tarachodidae:
Iris polystictica (Fischer-Waldheim, 1846 – - Spotted-winged iris

Orthoptera:

Tettigoniidae:
Phaneroptera falcata (Poda, 1761) – Common
Plastoptera Leptophyes albovittata (Kollar, 1833) – Common
Plastoptera Saga pedo (Pallas, 1771) – Prairie
dyba Decticus verrucivorus (Linnaeus, 1758) – Grey grasshopper
Platycleis intermedia (Serville, 1838)– Spotted Horseshoe
Tettigonia viridissima (Linnaeus, 1758) – Green grasshopper

Gryllidae:
Melanogryllus desertus (Pallas, 1771) - Steppe cricket
Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa (Linnaeus, 1758 – - Common bear

Acrididae:
Acrida bicolor (Thunberg, 1815) - Common acrida
Bryodemella tuberculata (Fabricius, 1775) - Broad-winged rattle
Acrotylus longipes (Charpentier, 1845) - Seaside filly
Calliptamus italicus (Linnaeus, 1758 – - Italian Prus

The list of straight-winged birds, in my opinion, still needs to be replenished and replenished smile.gif

28.02.2012 20:47, Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg

Should there be earwigs, cockroaches (probably Crimean endemics), possibly bacteria? The list of straight-winged birds is clearly insufficient.

28.02.2012 22:41, Pleco

Thanks! I absolutely agree with you. In my resulting table, by animal types and orders, there are graphs: "number of species at the time of organizing the reserve", "current state", "forecast"; this way you can see what you can expect from further research. So leatherwings and other groups, for which there is no information at all yet, are also taken into account there.

28.02.2012 22:54, Pleco

I want to clarify, is the Crimean bogomolchik a subspecies? is there a publication where it belongs to the heldreichi subspecies?

29.02.2012 0:23, Pleco

And another clarification, now mantises are a suborder of the cockroach-like order?

29.02.2012 1:14, Dracus

Pleco

I answered everything in the personal account.

29.02.2012 1:28, Pleco

Thank you very much! All received.

29.02.2012 8:42, Mantispid

I looked at my group of weevils, it's just * facepalm*
16 species of sithons (!) and not a single phyllobius or polydrusus? how so?
Ceuthorrynchidius sareptanus - what kind of nonsense?

29.02.2012 8:56, Bad Den

I looked at my group of weevils, it's just * facepalm*
16 species of sithons (!) and not a single phyllobius or polydrusus? how so?
Ceuthorrynchidius sareptanus - what kind of nonsense?

Everything is in your hands smile.gif

29.02.2012 10:40, Pleco

Actually, that's why I posted the lists, Ilya Andreevich, I will be grateful for your corrections and comments, what is clearly absurd, please note so that you can exclude it from the lists...
Thank you.

16.12.2012 11:16, okoem

If it is still relevant, I can add a little more butterflies for my own collections.
Opuk, November 10, 2012:

Colias croceus (Geoffroy, 1785)
Vanessa atalanta (Linnaeus, 1758)
Vanessa cardui (Linnaeus, 1758)
Autographa gamma (Linnaeus, 1758)
Polymixis latesco Fibiger, 2001 -
Agrochola lychnidis (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) -
Arctia festiva (Hufnagel, 1766) - caterpillars
of Macroglossum stellatarum (Linnaeus, 1758)in water
Malacosoma castrensis (Linnaeus, 1758) - яйца
Nomophila noctuella ([Denis & Schiffermuller], 1775)
Deuterotinea casanella (Eversmann, 1844)
Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus, 1758)
In addition, from old collections - Nebula achromaria (La Harpe, 1853)

Dragonflies:
Sympetrum striolatum
Sympetrum fonscolombii



Based on photos by I. Sikorsky (Nature Reserve and its surroundings):

Jordanita notata (Zeller, 1847)
Zygaena loti ([Denis & Schiffermuller], 1775)

Cnaemidophorus rhododactyla (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

Megaspilates mundataria (Stoll, 1782)
Scopula marginepunctata (Goeze, 1781)
Thetidia smaragdaria (Fabricius, 1787)
Lycia hirtaria (Clerck, 1759)

Hyles euphorbiae (Linnaeus, 1758)
Macroglossum stellatarum (Linnaeus, 1758)

Malacosoma castrensis (Linnaeus, 1758)

Saturnia pyri ([Denis & Schiffermuller], 1775) (the cocoon is probably Yakovenkovo)

Arctia festiva (Hufnagel, 1766)
Arctia villica (Linnaeus, 1758)

Catocala elocata (Esper, 1786)
Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner, [1808])
Aporophyla lutulenta ([Denis & Schiffermuller], 1775)
Aporophyla canescens (Duponchel, 1826)
Cucullia tanaceti ([Denis & Schiffermuller], 1775)
Periphanes delphinii (Linnaeus, 1758)
Polyphaenis viridis (de Villers, 1789)
Acronicta tridens ([Denis & Schiffermuller], 1775)

Papilio machaon (Linnaeus, 1758)

Polyommatus bellargus (Rottemburg, 1775)
Aricia agestis ([Denis & Schiffermuller], 1775)
Pseudophilotes bavius (Eversmann, 1832)
Plebeius argus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Melitaea didyma (Esper, 1779)

Maniola jurtina (Linnaeus, 1758)

Argiope bruennichi spider (Scopoli, 1772)
Ant Lion-Myrmecaelurus trigrammus (Pallas 1771)

16.12.2012 11:55, Pleco

Thank you, Vladimir!

Now it is more relevant for Igor Sikorsky-in the current chronicle of nature.

What is the situation with the butterfly atlas?

16.12.2012 14:01, okoem

Clear. I now regularly communicate with Igor.
Atlas in the layout process.

Pages: 1 2

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.