Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22... 52

14.10.2015 10:15, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45451

The author is not me, I will address only the lost photos found on which determined Maria :)

14.10.2015 0:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45451

Maria Eugenia photo exists at http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/18379, if you mean it. Only this kind of G onimbrasia, views Gonimbrasia zambesina

13.10.2015 21:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #37457

Reserves photo # 37418

13.10.2015 20:56, Irina Nikulina: comment on Pyrausta mutuurai

Here is the error in the writing of the species. Right Pyrausta m utuurai Inoue, 1982

13.10.2015 13:18, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45504

Congratulations, Ure! Only on the Japanese site, she met now and would still catch an insect))

11.10.2015 12:22, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45373

Coenonympha hero

11.10.2015 12:17, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45372

Lethe diana ssp.sachalinensis Matsumura, 1925

10.10.2015 22:17, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45282

Peter, it's just wonderful! Thank you! And in all other improvements too)

10.10.2015 21:37, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45282

And I also just explained Eugene wrote "somehow", I explained - how)

10.10.2015 21:02, Irina Nikulina: comment on Byctiscus populi

Replacing the photo was taken.

10.10.2015 20:57, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45282

I can not put in the illustration to the form that has not been downloaded to this type of start. After this photo was pereopredeleno.A view was illustrated to override. After redefining my LC signal is not received.After transferring photos to another kind ask the moderators to report if it illustrated the kind of image (this conversation was already), otherwise how can be tracked? Illustration ...

08.10.2015 22:28, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45134

Idaea humiliata ?

08.10.2015 22:25, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45132

Cepphis advenaria

08.10.2015 22:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45133

Scopula immorata

08.10.2015 22:23, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45135

Calliteara pudibunda male

08.10.2015 19:35, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45101

Celypha rosaceana?

08.10.2015 19:19, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45103

Scotopteryx chenopodiata

08.10.2015 16:19, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #45094

To put in Melanthia mandschuricata (Bremer, 1864), both in the Catalog Sinev, but there were doubts as We have more Mesoleuca mandschuricata (Bremer, 1864) http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/60938 Clearly, this is one kind of double and must be removed. And doubt, because there are both http://www.catocala.narod.ru/geom94.html and http://olegberlov.narod.ru/geom94.html. How true?

07.10.2015 20:57, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #44995

Melitaea athalia

07.10.2015 14:20, Irina Nikulina: comment on Lomaspilis opis

Add the subspecies: Lomaspilis opis amurensis (Hedemann, 1881)

07.10.2015 14:11, Irina Nikulina: comment on Arichanna melanaria

Add the subspecies: Arichanna melanaria askoldinaria (Oberthür, 1880)

07.10.2015 14:10, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #44945

Arichanna melanaria askoldinaria (Oberthür, 1880)

06.10.2015 23:13, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #44890

Eugene, is dead. This summer hit at the peak flight of schrenckii, a huge number of butterflies of summer (probably even worn)) low along the forest road from Anisimovka on the hill, they often sits down on the road and fell under the wheels of the rare machines (This is not a guess, she observed.Well uninjured arranged immediately feast, gathering around the dead brothers in groups of 10-20 ...

06.10.2015 13:37, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #31857

http://www.jpmoth.org/Limacodidae/Limacodinae/Austrapoda_dentata.html In Primorye, only 17 species limakodid, all other views (in the neighboring regions and even less - 12).

05.10.2015 12:10, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #31584

I think this is one of your two Neocifuna, most likely, Neocifuna jankowskii http://blog.daum.net/_blog/BlogTypeView.do?blogid=07cyz&articleno=15873765&categoryId=763636®dt=20131013172303, there is a caterpillar late age. Well, just in case Neocifuna eurydice http://www.jpmoth.org/Lymantriidae/Ilema_eurydice.html, then she Ilema eurydice.In any case, the larvae of both species are polyphagous, ...

04.10.2015 23:15, Irina Nikulina: comment on Aeshna juncea

Photo overridden, you need to clear the page

04.10.2015 23:13, Irina Nikulina: comment on Sympetrum sanguineum

The second photo overridden, must be removed from a page

04.10.2015 22:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on Chalcolestes viridis

Peter, photo overridden, you need to clear the page

04.10.2015 22:33, Irina Nikulina: comment on Meganola gigas

Deliver to Rhynchopalpus gigas (at Sinev), then I discovered that the photo Eugene (also from Primorye) are in Meganola gigas http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/91700. We must unite page.

03.10.2015 22:10, Irina Nikulina: comment on Euproctis

It's not relevant, Peter

01.10.2015 19:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #31857

I think that Austrapoda dentata

30.09.2015 1:28, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36978

It Neptis philyroides. Characteristic features already discussed here http://insecta.pro/gallery/21457 and to compare 2 full image types: Neptis philyroides http://www.nabistory.co.kr/nabi-htm/109.htm and Neptis philyra http: //www.nabistory.co.kr/nabi-htm/108.htm

29.09.2015 20:20, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #44443

Help Wanted. 2 first photos of 7 set to Parasa sinica , about the remaining 5'm not sure - do not Parasa hilarata Do they? I decided with the help of professionals to understand the differences between these two closely related species. Both species are quite common in Primorye, habitat and time of flight of similar caterpillars develop on the same plant.She found only one indication of their ...

28.09.2015 11:45, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #22584

Paul and Tim Stratford - specialist lepidopterist? Or, as an amateur photographer? In his albums Dysphania militaris it looks quite different https://www.flickr.com/photos/beautiful_bugs/10887770244/in/album-72157644450043429/ All Dysphania the region http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/dysphaniini /gallery.php

28.09.2015 11:17, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27094

Thank you! Hence, the right conclusions from the article. Dim, take the time - and the keys lay out and describe the types of details to add.

28.09.2015 1:37, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27094

Dim, I first of others. Sources, including "Keys to the insects DDA", v.5, p.2 understand, there is difference between the two types of given shape / size of holes in the HCC. But just answer me), today still made it to the article and not in vain.Detailed description of the type 3, living in the RFE and given the keys to their definitions in appearance, figures and good eyes to LC and PC are ...

27.09.2015 21:43, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #43290

Thank you Paul! With regard to this species were highly questionable. Let me explain why put the form P. sinicum. Initially, based on http://www.jpmoth.org/Notodontidae/Pterostoma_gigantinum.html gallery and P. Morozov topic Notodontidae on molbiole uniquely defined as Pterostoma gigantimum . But before you put usually Sinev look into what kinds of 40 registration and check everything.So, ...

24.09.2015 11:26, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #31574

This butterfly has long rest does not) I can see whose determination, and yet suggest that there was an error in the photo male Anticypella diffusaria

23.09.2015 19:05, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27094

With differences gnoma artemis and finally sorted out, defining captured this summer Actias. Here Actias gnoma, I think. Dmitry, what do you say? I see you're already familiar with the article.

23.09.2015 11:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #42702

Fedor, it is impossible. Peter knows the problem, but its solution is not easy, takes time in the near future he will do that, I do not think that should remove the name of the subspecies, let's just wait and as soon as the problem comes off, fast forward everything in place. Such statement to the subspecies accumulated all at checkout.

22.09.2015 20:49, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #43849

Interesting copy! Ure, until you have the night, I was engaged in excavation) Well, nevertheless, considered, I think it is June 17th 1901. And it seems that it charges from Japan. If this is Peter Schmidt, just in 1899, he first went to the Far East as the head of the Korean-Sakhalin expedition.In late summer 1900 he made an expedition to the land of Korea Wonsan to Pusan. A 1901g.byl in Japan ...