Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23... 52
It is necessary to combine pages with http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/22144.
In V.Palearktike subspecies Clostera albosigma curtuloides Erschoff, 1870 (to the insects of the Russian Far East, v.5, Part 3, p. 588) All other photos here albosigma also belong to this subspecies.
In the Russian Far East subspecies Cerura erminea candida (Staudinger, 1892) - that the following 4 photo. (To insects of the Russian Far East, v.5, ch. 3, str537) It is necessary to make a subspecies of the page type.
Only now it's probably the kind ofParasa sinica. In Sinev kind hilarula not, on the site too. But caterpillars sinica just such http://www.weblio.jp/content/Parasa+sinica http://www.jpmoth.org/Limacodidae/Limacodinae/Parasa_sinica.html
Comostola subtiliaria, I think
There are doubts, that here and in the adjacent images caterpillars Parasa consocia, they are a little bit more http://www.jpmoth.org/Limacodidae/Limacodinae/Parasa_consocia.html. And it is ratherParasa hilarata, uncommon in view of the Primorye http://www.jlpazy.com/www/main/Show.asp?PicID=540 and http://www.bubuleps.com/Parasahilarata.php.
http://rusinsects.com/hesperid/hes-o-oc.htm and http://rusinsects.com/hesperid/hes-tsyl.htm They are well differ on underside, especially in the central cell and transmission dark wide at the near-edge zone ochracea. Here is a typical underside ochracea http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35275 Determination confirmed S.Korbom. In sylvatica underside uniformly yellow with dark veins are well incised ...
ThisThymelicus sylvatica
Here is the reference for new subspecies: http://www.catalogueoflife.org/col/details/species/id/cd8450659d34e9b0c8489a26ae56c7fc
Peter, I have not quite get it, should I give the reference? Usually you or moderators added species/subspecies. Here is the reference, just in case: http://www.gbif.org/species/104857692 и http://gni.globalnames.org/name_strings?page=413&search_term=ns%3AGAS*
It also Endothenia sp. Determination of Al. Zhakova. Photos in the group
Gastropacha populifolia angustipennis Walker, 1855
Gastropacha populifolia angustipennis Walker, 1855. It's necessary to add the subspecies and the description of the species.
Endothenia sp. Determination of Al. Zhakova
Argynnis sp.
This is a repeat of the photo # 37134.
Arctornis l-nigrum ussuricum Bytinski-Salz, 1939 . This subspecies is stated in the genus description but it doesn't appear in auto expand. There are only three subspecies appear and ussurica (um) is absent. This Far Eastern subspecies tend to have more obvious black L.
In my opinion, it is a shabby Ctenoplusia agnata http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/10Plusiinae/4163%20Ctenoplusia%20agnata/Ctenoplusia%20agnata.htm
Thyatira batis mandschurica Werny, 1967 It is necessary to add the subspecies
Paratalanta sp. (see the bottom comment.)
Udea sp. Determination to the kind of confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS)
Udea sp. Determination to the kind of confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS)
Well then, no question. In fact it's difficult to tell the size by the photo, but once you compare with Thyrgorina jankowskii, probably it is a miniata.
There is another close species from Russian Far East Miltochrista rosacea, i do not know what exact deference between them, there is few photos of rosacea.
I Guess, Eilema nankingicum
3 photo supplied from Cossus Anisimovka and Tiger. I GuessCossus cossus. In Sinev listed species Cossus 2 to 40 in the region, and for Cossus cossus with WFD Set 1 podvid- Cossus cossus chinensis Rothschild, 1912. But molbiole Roman Yakovlev defined kossusov of Southern Primorye how Cossus orientalis Gaede, 1929. As in Sinev and we on the site of this kind is not (and subspecies C. c. shinensis ...
Sash, I also thought that we have in schuetzeella are not they, what is written in June. But schuetzeella and abietella differ significantly for different razmerami- ist Cams at the first sweep of 21-27mm (on lepiforume max. Size given 24), while the second 27-33mm.With this summer took a habit to strangers and calmly seated butterfly record size, it is often useful, so at this and last staged in ...
Having dealt in detail, I agree with Victor -Dioryctria abietella
Deileptenia mandschuriaria
37808
Reserves photo # 37788
Again, thank you, Basil, I'll know. It is even better), online photo abietaria has not yet been
Here help is needed -Eupithecia analoga? I do not know whether it is possible to distinguish the photo fromEupithecia abietaria?
Peter, I already knew) But is not the case - I do families confused, zelёnenkoe saw - and in the school slapped)))) This blockage photos, decided to DV quickly Bohr put, in a hurry, not anymore) And Sasha generous me He regretted), for which he thanks!
But when put, I hesitated)) I hasten) Thank you, Sasha!
Idaea auricruda
Peter, it would be necessary, of course, to clarify, but not in time)) I am writing now with the companies Jura Semeykina)) all heartfelt greetings to the DV-open spaces !!! )
Syntomiini. Coming soon likely,Syntomoides imaon(It often occurs as a Ceryx imaon) Or someone else from Ceryx)
In Hungary, the Garden of the Budapest Zoo (one of the favorite places in the city, I did the zoo never seen!)) A butterfly garden I have something to compare, at the time was in Shёnbrunnskom Garden of Vienna and in a couple of French Languedoc -Russilone.Those greatly impressed everyone - and plenty of species of butterflies, and the freshness and especially recreated natural environment. So ...
Heliconius erato?
Heliconius melpomene?
There were doubts about their definitions of 2-year-old ... Sasha, look, please do not jota whether it still # 23288. At the same time, and today metallovidok - too long to put inaccurate.
Dioryctria sp. From 4 to 8 dwelling reg tend toDioryctria schuetzeella(doubt between her and abietella. There is no certainty that the site is correct definitions schuetzeella)
All finished writing, thank you, Sasha. And Paul, thanks for the definition. Revised set before summer Furcula, doubts also arose, did not have time to ask around. But under Bohr flew dozens of these a week - will determine the training, all are not LW)) In general, a surprising number of the summer, despite the weather, so we will fill up the site)
Caligo memnon?
And is notPheosia gnoma?
Sasha, well, maybe inaccurate deliver? ... I actually thought that they were from different genera, and more than 38,037 per female Adela reaumurella like. No? And the color of pubescence palps is not very visible, indeed it is dark, like violellus. Although the author writes that his 2 sites identified, including lepiforume ..
caterpillar
pupa
caterpillar
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 8:58, E. Komarov: Алексей Адамов Здравствуйте Евген...
- 23:07, N. Pichugin: Всем доброго времени суток! Откликн...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Neither fish nor flesh, or what butterflies actually prefer
