Pages: 1 ...19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27... 52
I agree with Alexander, to review all the differences in detail http://pisum.bionet.nsc.ru/kosterin/eligea.htm
With regard to these two types of primarily I want to say that to compare this image with images from the network completely useless if they show European Eno and Daphne. Both species are very volatile (especially strong geography.volatility looks Brenthis ino, is celebrated by all the authors, since Kurentsova) Therefore, you can only compare sub-species, particularly common in the region of ...
I looked all Bolor (klossian) 37 reg, I think that itBoloria angarensishttp://rusinsects.com/nymph/nc-anga.htm http://babochki.narod.ru/ny44.html In the Lower Amur region distributed subspecies of Boloria angarensis hakutozana (Matsumura, 1927), for which just a characteristic dimming http://www.flickr.com/photos/37256239@N03/3431692754 Note copies. the latest link in the assembled n. Mountain ...
Ure, in Sinev subspecies P. a. pseudaegon No, because he was isolated in a separate view, and you can use your reference. Given the variability, I do not think that you can not reliably determine the underside view here. Yes, even all sorts of hybrid forms, which are more AI Kurentsov wrote (p.133) Perhaps we should rather look at the prevalence and intensity of the near-edge figure. In ...
Alexander was ready to accept, and even wrote that this subspecies L. h. duplicata Staudinger, 1892, which stains more and strips wider than the nominative, but then saw that it Primorye, not hub. edge, and there is a very similar kind of undersideLimenitis doerriesihttp://rusinsects.com/nymph/nl-doer.htm ...
I agree with Aleksandrom.U subspecies Po amurica Kurentzov, 1970 is just such a large black pattern. And the butterflies themselves are larger. Females psevdoegon and subsolanus quite different.
Well, Svetlana, I think that Native) Here, most likely, justSimplicia bimarginataor perhaps, schaldusalis , you need to watch, but I do. Unfortunately, I can not, the problem with the computer (temporary hopefully)
Good flyCatocala nuptaSorry, Nicholas, I can not ask - and what caused such a careless framing (not the first time)?
Mythimna turcalikely. http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Moths%20of%20Kagoshima/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/3610Mythimna/3610Mythimna_turca/Mythimna%20turca.htm
And she does not Calpinae and Pyralidae, and from Herminiinae appeared :) Simplicia many species in Borneo, but good different structure submarginal zone crimp sling color. As a result, he stopped two close species Simplicia griseolimbalis ...
I also think that it is. I doubt between her and dahlii, did not write, but now revised, and this is where good photos persuaded http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=844& ( there have dahlii)
Sasha, I think mostMythimna grandis http://catocala.narod.ru/noc320.html (Form postbaz. sling at the lower edge of the VC, dark bar on the cost. region at the root of the VC) http://catocala.narod.ru/noc171_a.html - Compare opaca
Alcis maculata http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Boarmiini/boarmiini_36_3.php http://catalog.digitalarchives.tw/item/00/3f/e9/20.html
Descriptions revered here without doubtLophoptera squammilinea, there are good signs of differences from lineigera, moreover it is the only closely related species with a wingspan of 36-38 mm (at lineigera - 28-30). Kind of have to do)
But this, it seems,Atrachea japonica? http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/3767_Atrachea/3815_Atrachea_japonica/Atrachea%20japonica.htm The Japanese write that the rarest species of the genus (them). Early autumn scoop. From 4 LW species not found picture Atrachea alpherakyi Kononenko, 1986 (= jankowskii (Alpheraky, 1897)
Atrachea jankowskiiThis scoop was picked Oleg Pekarsky here http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=235015&view=findpost&p=1416247 (and this image we have on the site, but without reference to determined the )
There is even more interesting :) Maybe too shabbyCucullia pustulata?? http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=190139&view=findpost&p=825364 (Although to me it seemed like all over Europe.Cucullia lactucaehttp://catocala.narod.ru/noc211.html But lactucae after further Zabaikalye not?)
I understand) 3 days look, saw all discussions on molbiole, hoping just for you with Basil. Methodically and several times to view all 17 ET)
Here guess yetCucullia lucifugahttp://catocala.narod.ru/noc76_a.html http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Cuculliinae/Cucullia_lucifuga.html (There were doubts about the subspecies C. p. Fraterna )
3 photo kapyushonnits has long been hanging venture to still offer a definition. I reviewed all types of the 37th Region (Sinev of their 17). I think that thereCucullia pustulata. In Berlova - a subspecies of the Cucullia pustulata fraterna Butler, 1878 http://catocala.narod.ru/noc327.html on our website appearance pustulata (a subspecies fraterna) is there, but the view is not indicated for ...
Butterfly fly, drawing several zatёrt, and yet I would venture to suggest that itAcosmetia chinensis(= Hadjina chinensis auct.) Http://catocala.narod.ru/noc312.html http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Hadeninae/Hadjina_chinensis.html
Idaea foedata, is likely http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Sterrhinae/Idaea_foedata.html http://blog.daum.net/hangusuk/549
Plebejus subsolanus, female. I think that ssp.barabash Churkin & Zhdanko, 2003. On the underside PC second from bottom spot median band usually stands out shape and size, which is characteristic of this subspecies http://www.gorodinski.ru/view_lycaenidae.php?id_lycaenidae=46
Author and could stay on Avatha tepescens, they seem to have appeared at the same time), Basil, to clarify)
Yes, understood, Sasha, thank you. I think such issues arise more than once, yesterday Cucullia understand, there is also a discrepancy with the Catalogue Sinev later write, understand, please, dear moderators)
Yes, Basil, on jpmoth.org Berlova and I looked and saw that there Hm adaucta Butler, 1878. But it was initially decided to adhere to the Russian Catalog ed. Sinev, here on it I specified.
Basil, clarified once again - in the RFE 2 types - maritima and ononis (the latter only in the Amur region. And Primorye). Adaucta general for the RF is omitted.
Agrius convolvulidark shape of a caterpillar http://www.amentsoc.org/publications/bulletin/articles/convolvulus-hawk-moth-larvae.html http://www.jpmoth.org/Sphingidae/Sphinginae/Agrius_convolvuli. html