E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27... 52

08.02.2015 23:43, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38931

Satyrium eximius

08.02.2015 23:43, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38932

Phengaris arionides

08.02.2015 23:43, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38934

Phengaris arionides

08.02.2015 22:06, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38929

Brenthis daphne

08.02.2015 18:26, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38840

I agree with Alexander, to review all the differences in detail http://pisum.bionet.nsc.ru/kosterin/eligea.htm

08.02.2015 14:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38913

With regard to these two types of primarily I want to say that to compare this image with images from the network completely useless if they show European Eno and Daphne. Both species are very volatile (especially strong geography.volatility looks Brenthis ino, is celebrated by all the authors, since Kurentsova) Therefore, you can only compare sub-species, particularly common in the region of ...

07.02.2015 12:43, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38891

I looked all Bolor (klossian) 37 reg, I think that itBoloria angarensishttp://rusinsects.com/nymph/nc-anga.htm http://babochki.narod.ru/ny44.html In the Lower Amur region distributed subspecies of Boloria angarensis hakutozana (Matsumura, 1927), for which just a characteristic dimming http://www.flickr.com/photos/37256239@N03/3431692754 Note copies. the latest link in the assembled n. Mountain ...

06.02.2015 21:47, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #32750

It is not davidi, andEuphydryas ichnea

06.02.2015 21:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38892

I agree, of two species living in 37 reg, this is ichnea

05.02.2015 21:29, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38527

Ure, in Sinev subspecies P. a. pseudaegon No, because he was isolated in a separate view, and you can use your reference. Given the variability, I do not think that you can not reliably determine the underside view here. Yes, even all sorts of hybrid forms, which are more AI Kurentsov wrote (p.133) Perhaps we should rather look at the prevalence and intensity of the near-edge figure. In ...

05.02.2015 17:03, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38871

Alexander was ready to accept, and even wrote that this subspecies L. h. duplicata Staudinger, 1892, which stains more and strips wider than the nominative, but then saw that it Primorye, not hub. edge, and there is a very similar kind of undersideLimenitis doerriesihttp://rusinsects.com/nymph/nl-doer.htm ...

04.02.2015 12:05, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38847

And here, I think,Plebejus argus

04.02.2015 11:19, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38846

I agree with Aleksandrom.U subspecies Po amurica Kurentzov, 1970 is just such a large black pattern. And the butterflies themselves are larger. Females psevdoegon and subsolanus quite different.

04.02.2015 10:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38844

Limenitis sydyi

02.02.2015 0:22, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #30258

Well, Svetlana, I think that Native) Here, most likely, justSimplicia bimarginataor perhaps, schaldusalis , you need to watch, but I do. Unfortunately, I can not, the problem with the computer (temporary hopefully)

01.02.2015 17:27, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38817

Good flyCatocala nuptaSorry, Nicholas, I can not ask - and what caused such a careless framing (not the first time)?

01.02.2015 16:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38818

Mythimna turcalikely. http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Moths%20of%20Kagoshima/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/3610Mythimna/3610Mythimna_turca/Mythimna%20turca.htm

01.02.2015 0:52, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #21203

3-4 dating sites likeIdaea macrospila(including at our cost)

01.02.2015 0:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33691

And she does not Calpinae and Pyralidae, and from Herminiinae appeared :) Simplicia many species in Borneo, but good different structure submarginal zone crimp sling color. As a result, he stopped two close species Simplicia griseolimbalis ...

31.01.2015 21:56, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38807

Catocala promissa

31.01.2015 17:59, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38794

I also think that it is. I doubt between her and dahlii, did not write, but now revised, and this is where good photos persuaded http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=844& ( there have dahlii)

31.01.2015 16:46, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38793

Sasha, I think mostMythimna grandis http://catocala.narod.ru/noc320.html (Form postbaz. sling at the lower edge of the VC, dark bar on the cost. region at the root of the VC) http://catocala.narod.ru/noc171_a.html - Compare opaca

30.01.2015 23:56, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33577

Alcis maculata http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Boarmiini/boarmiini_36_3.php http://catalog.digitalarchives.tw/item/00/3f/e9/20.html

30.01.2015 15:32, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38774

Descriptions revered here without doubtLophoptera squammilinea, there are good signs of differences from lineigera, moreover it is the only closely related species with a wingspan of 36-38 mm (at lineigera - 28-30). Kind of have to do)

30.01.2015 0:08, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27723

But this, it seems,Atrachea japonica? http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/3767_Atrachea/3815_Atrachea_japonica/Atrachea%20japonica.htm The Japanese write that the rarest species of the genus (them). Early autumn scoop. From 4 LW species not found picture Atrachea alpherakyi Kononenko, 1986 (= jankowskii (Alpheraky, 1897)

29.01.2015 22:36, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38735

Atrachea jankowskiiThis scoop was picked Oleg Pekarsky here http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=235015&view=findpost&p=1416247 (and this image we have on the site, but without reference to determined the )

29.01.2015 18:59, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29021

There is even more interesting :) Maybe too shabbyCucullia pustulata?? http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=190139&view=findpost&p=825364 (Although to me it seemed like all over Europe.Cucullia lactucaehttp://catocala.narod.ru/noc211.html But lactucae after further Zabaikalye not?)

29.01.2015 18:16, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29018

I understand) 3 days look, saw all discussions on molbiole, hoping just for you with Basil. Methodically and several times to view all 17 ET)

29.01.2015 17:58, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29018

Here guess yetCucullia lucifugahttp://catocala.narod.ru/noc76_a.html http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Cuculliinae/Cucullia_lucifuga.html (There were doubts about the subspecies C. p. Fraterna )

29.01.2015 17:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29019

Sasha, and other 2nd hope for help, not sure that there is the same kind now write.

29.01.2015 17:22, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29019

3 photo kapyushonnits has long been hanging venture to still offer a definition. I reviewed all types of the 37th Region (Sinev of their 17). I think that thereCucullia pustulata. In Berlova - a subspecies of the Cucullia pustulata fraterna Butler, 1878 http://catocala.narod.ru/noc327.html on our website appearance pustulata (a subspecies fraterna) is there, but the view is not indicated for ...

29.01.2015 16:02, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29338

Butterfly fly, drawing several zatёrt, and yet I would venture to suggest that itAcosmetia chinensis(= Hadjina chinensis auct.) Http://catocala.narod.ru/noc312.html http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Hadeninae/Hadjina_chinensis.html

29.01.2015 11:20, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38756

Idaea foedata, is likely http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Sterrhinae/Idaea_foedata.html http://blog.daum.net/hangusuk/549

28.01.2015 22:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38749

Plebejus subsolanus, female. I think that ssp.barabash Churkin & Zhdanko, 2003. On the underside PC second from bottom spot median band usually stands out shape and size, which is characteristic of this subspecies http://www.gorodinski.ru/view_lycaenidae.php?id_lycaenidae=46

28.01.2015 22:54, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38748

Plebejus subsolanus

28.01.2015 22:53, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38747

Atara arata

28.01.2015 22:53, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38746

Cupido argiades

28.01.2015 22:52, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38745

Lycaena dispar

28.01.2015 21:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on Avatha noctuoides

Author and could stay on Avatha tepescens, they seem to have appeared at the same time), Basil, to clarify)

28.01.2015 18:17, Irina Nikulina: comment on Avatha noctuoides

This species is not, apparently, there is a typo. Perhaps it meant Avatha noctuoides ?

28.01.2015 16:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38739

Yes, understood, Sasha, thank you. I think such issues arise more than once, yesterday Cucullia understand, there is also a discrepancy with the Catalogue Sinev later write, understand, please, dear moderators)

27.01.2015 20:16, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38739

Yes, Basil, on jpmoth.org Berlova and I looked and saw that there Hm adaucta Butler, 1878. But it was initially decided to adhere to the Russian Catalog ed. Sinev, here on it I specified.

27.01.2015 19:21, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38739

Basil, clarified once again - in the RFE 2 types - maritima and ononis (the latter only in the Amur region. And Primorye). Adaucta general for the RF is omitted.

27.01.2015 15:33, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38739

Heliothis maritima

27.01.2015 15:33, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38740

Heliothis maritima

27.01.2015 15:33, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38741

Heliothis maritima

26.01.2015 11:26, Irina Nikulina: comment on Tarsolepis sommeri

Here, too, redefined the photo, you need to remove them from the illustrations to view

26.01.2015 11:22, Irina Nikulina: comment on Anthophilopsis baphialis

Peter, you need to remove a photo from the illustrations of mind, it redefined

24.01.2015 18:33, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38661

Agrius convolvulidark shape of a caterpillar http://www.amentsoc.org/publications/bulletin/articles/convolvulus-hawk-moth-larvae.html http://www.jpmoth.org/Sphingidae/Sphinginae/Agrius_convolvuli. html

24.01.2015 17:53, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38663

Smerinthus planuslast age? In the region of 40 Smerinthus only caecus more lives, but he has other tracks.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.