E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30... 52

18.12.2014 22:33, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #21219

There are two closely related speciesMaxates korintjiensisandMaxates inaptaria. Distinctive features in the description on mothsofborneo to the korintjiensis - long tails ZK slightly sickle curved apex VC thin flat red line along the edges of the wings having a muffled, a bit dark-green color, a sling and discal spots neotchёtlivye, fringe cream. ...

18.12.2014 16:21, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #21076

Dmitri, have lariaria silnozubchatye dark external sling, and it is given as the main difference. sign; this is confusing. I would venture to suggest something quite differentEpipristis neleariaNote the shape of the white edge bond of BK. Dark areas (maroon) are of varying intensity, including Just noticeable and such like in this ...

18.12.2014 12:09, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36582

She asked, because to deal with relatives rubimontana - rubicunda - tapungkanana and confused here this greenish tapungkanana http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21076. Does not agree she somehow no description on mothsofborneo, no photo. You have this kind probably have in your collection?

18.12.2014 0:38, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36582

Dmitry and Pingasa all defined?)

17.12.2014 23:49, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36505

Where is the smiley face "embarrassment" :)))? "Fighter" is pleased that the expert confirmed the result nekorotkih searches - so no wonder!

17.12.2014 23:43, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36580

See impossible - to what do you want all this perefotografirovat !! :))) You can even hand-G16-th :) (Not once since rented copies. Collection of Vladivostok, obtained excellent) A general business Sasha says. Sorry, Dmitry, you are far away, you would be filmed with great pleasure)

17.12.2014 16:41, Irina Nikulina: comment on Choristoneura lafauryana

Peter, here it is necessary to clear the page from the photo, Alexander suffered them to others. Mind

17.12.2014 16:36, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36505

Yes, Dmitri, thank you, I, too, yesterday to get to the bottom of this review, even wanted to give a link here, but then esteemed for new species (after 1969) and realized that nothing is clear, descriptions of some not .. and did not.

17.12.2014 14:29, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36456

:) And while single in females, please, this and 2 more pictures of the form

17.12.2014 13:08, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36456

When versed with views, a lot of things to read in this issue, too, was interesting - there are different opinions on this subject), Dmitry, and you work Lorkovika, though long-standing, not read? Lorcovic Z "The genetics and reproductive isolating mechanisms of the pieris napi-brionae group" (1962) http://images.peabody.yale.edu/lepsoc/jls/1960s/1962/1962-16%282%29105-Lorkovic. pdf Summary He's ...

17.12.2014 2:37, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36456

Parses a year ago at the same time and dulcinea melete, if briefly - that males napi, especially 2-3 generations, it's hard to distinguish from males bryoniae.But females bryoniae painted usually much darker, much of the PC covered with gray or gray-brown coating, particularly very dusty at the root, background wings - yellow, yellowish-white (in some subspecies - rich yellow) along the veins of ...

16.12.2014 23:27, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36505

http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2313694#page/11/mode/1up sheets with illustrations copied, flip, increased everyone can understand) + especially marked in the text.

16.12.2014 23:13, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36505

Yes, Dmitri, I agree that the review part, I only contributed one well-matched version of widespread species from the set described. You decide where to put, and put there. Where to see the newly described species not know was looking for. If there is a source - tell me, please.

16.12.2014 22:38, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36505

The revision is given a detailed description of 26 species and subspecies of 8 illustrations. They differ in the number of good, size, arrangement of white spots on the VC and NC, configuration and size of the dark zones and the boundaries between the red and black zones (crimp number of projections).On set - picture VC - picture NC - Size - Select only one option (of a drawing in line 2, but the ...

16.12.2014 17:49, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36505

Yes, I had in mind a more specific indication of the country. Africa is big)) And I totally agree about the importance of labels. That's just not clear - we sort of do not let nikak- either orally or in any prescribed rules - statement on the website bezetiketochnyh copies.(only wishes write)), but it will not identify? But then why would there be these photos - as an element of decor? :) Either ...

16.12.2014 15:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36505

Just kind of Telipna. There is a detailed overview «A revision of the genus Telipna Aurivillius» (by Thomas Herbert Elliot Jackson), which describes all kinds of (30) (but in English). Cursorily looked - at least 10 species with a similar pattern. You can probably exclude some, knowing wingspan, and then look in more detail. Please try again later. With geography in any way? The review is given ...

16.12.2014 0:26, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #21199

I forgot to write - male http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-3/bombycidae/bombycidae_2_1.php

15.12.2014 22:20, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #21199

Gunda ochracea http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/80_BOMBYCOIDEA/05_BOMBYCIDAE/02_Gunda/Gunda%20ochracea/Gunda%20ochracea.htm Well it differs from other species of the genus

13.12.2014 14:28, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #28986

The 37 reg uncommon http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/74_Geometridae/72.2_Ennominae/2712_Ectephrina_semilutea/Ectephrina%20semilutea.htm https://fotki.yandex.ru/next/users/bianor/album/143155/view/570883 - there are many copies. collected

13.12.2014 11:59, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34910

Basil does not agree) Analysis of the genital apparatus would define beautiful and accurate) information from the literature and comparative analysis, of course, is not superfluous, but the exact answer would give only cooking. So the winner worthy of applause, I can not feel :) Now, if cooked ... which can not (And it would be interesting to learn)

13.12.2014 0:28, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #28938

Everything is clear now, thank you, Basil!

12.12.2014 22:07, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #28938

Vasily, thank you! And robustum specify - yes, in April really did not even look, maybe. Sinev in it only for Primorye specified, but once found in the article about the 6 specimens. of the reserve, looking, of course .. I Focus on illyustatsiyu here - "A review of Biston Leach, 1815 (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Ennominae) from China ..." http://bdj.pensoft.net//showimg.php?filename = oo_18919.jpg ...

12.12.2014 18:32, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #28938

Well, here it back) has long wanted to write that in the meantime with a view of trying to understand hypoleucos. I have not found the images and do not think that they are on the network. The species was described from Kazakevichevo village (40 km from Khabarovsk). The article EA Belyaeva, SV Vasilenko, V. Dubatolov, AMLong "moth Bolshekhekhtsirsky Reserve (near Khabarovsk)" (Amur Zoological ...

12.12.2014 0:10, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34910

At least, made some clarity) That's what I write on Oenospila. The genus of 11 species of Southeast Asia and Australia.On set of 3 signs - white costal margin, the presence of large dark trugolnyh spots in the dorsal edge of the NC and jagged reddish-brown bands on both wings - can be identified for the region 4 near the Asian species - altistrix, microstrix, gemmans, kopperi .Kind of gemmans ...

10.12.2014 21:00, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34910

It is very knowledge would help wingspan. Basil, please specify)

10.12.2014 17:12, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34803

Perhaps I am mistaken, but there are doubts that this patrana. The considerations are - confused discal spot in a narrow bar, most photos it is much thicker http://taibif.tw/zh/namecode/344426 (here in the film image 15). In addition there have patrana two parallel weak strokes above and below the ground, and postbazalnaya wavy band is well expressed.But the main thing - Bending apekalnoy zone VC ...

10.12.2014 16:26, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #35990

And here, too mjoebergi, with the same explanation as under # 35886

10.12.2014 12:43, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #35986

But it was he, the little tails on HCC between Rs and M1 in place - this mjoebergi and differs from similar species delineata. And other species in the genus Dalima with drawing no wings. Perhaps geography mothsofborneo outdated?) We've already convinced a couple of times in this newly ..

10.12.2014 12:03, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29879

Well, yes, in Pelagodes only cooking it is all about. And this is the 8th segment "of the male abdomen" appears as a major diagnostic feature on all kinds of photo Pelagodes after cooking. For example - any http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_37_7.php.

09.12.2014 17:00, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29879

I am also very "love" species of these genera, Dmitry :))) particularly because it does not exist anywhere on the prescribed key is good :).Pelagodes - and can not be (there is still the 8th segment decides?) But there is in the description of types of Thalassodes and Orothalassodes and Diagnosis any defining characteristics and features that it is possible to collect all in one place, but the ...

09.12.2014 16:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36195

Oh ... the horror ..) Peter, but he moved it out of fright, probably :)), much better than usual with the English. into Russian. Meaning uhvachena) But I have refused such specificity. texts on the Google-transleytu drive ((get to the essence - and then in your own words) And where do you want to put this? On angloyaz. version?

09.12.2014 16:15, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36195

But there was not a female Godonela avitusaria, and the maleGodonela hygieshttp://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=313426. Basil, look, please, at postdiskalnuyu double sash, it does not reach the bone, and gradually, with rounding, it deviates from it - a defining characteristic of this species.And females of this species is more homogeneous image of the wings, with less ...

09.12.2014 16:13, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36197

And drawing the top and underside of the wings and the shape of the wing of the male (significantly different from that in females) - all exactly consistent with the features in the description of the formGodonela avitusariaand images online

09.12.2014 0:10, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29916

Not tumida, femaleDiehlea ducalis(justification for photo # 30184)

09.12.2014 0:05, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33514

And is not tumida, the explanation here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30184. Also, I think the femaleDiehlea ducalis

08.12.2014 23:41, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #30184

This does not tumida, Basil. In tumida apekalny blunt angle VK / cut and the width of the zone postmedialnoy bone is much more than the dorsal angle. Look at what angle postdiskalnaya sling goes here (almost tornalny angle included) http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/04_NOLIDAE/02_CHLOEPHORINAE/108_Diehlea/Diehlea_tumida/Diehlea%20tumida.htm and under what pictured ...

08.12.2014 23:37, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #30390

Ornithospila submonstrans(wavy sling chevron discal spot on the LC, light fringe with dark narrow strip in front of it)

08.12.2014 23:31, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #30191

And this is still the sameOrnithospila submonstrans

08.12.2014 18:57, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29879

To comply with requests to paint the details Basil Identification signs. On mothsofborneo there is an indication that all six species are easily distinguishable on these grounds. I must say that not agree with Basil that "color fringing is not the first and last base and should be more signs." Sometimes the color fringe is the first and the last, that is,the only feature of closely related ...

08.12.2014 0:33, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29879

Yes, all the 6 types (she already looked and read) is well-defined features. By combining color / shape discal spots, fringe, the bond of all 6 clearly distinguishable. Tomorrow I will try to write everything, if necessary. Almost sure that the photoOrnithospila submonstrans

07.12.2014 23:12, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29879

Basil, as the definition is not the issue, then you know how to safely externally 5-6 all similar types of Borneo differ. That there was no doubt, if not difficult to write as this kind of, for example, to distinguish submonstrans ...

07.12.2014 11:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #6380

Olga, the second name - a subspecies of copper-butterfly Celastrina sugitanii (Matsumura, 1919) (http://sunyou.co.kr/gallery/?offset=75&cate1=&searchkey=&searchvalue=), inhabiting just only in one region of the Russian Federation, Sakhalin - C. s. sachalinensis (Esaki, 1922).

07.12.2014 1:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #21198

Risoba walshaesame butterfly, as in the previous photo # 21197

06.12.2014 22:04, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #28441

http://lepidoptera.crimea.ua/1701_Pterophoridae/Calyciphora_xanthodactyla.htm

06.12.2014 20:49, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #21244

I think that here Pingasa alba http://hattoritaka.web.fc2.com/ga2012/ooshiroayashaku.html Similar species reviewed. As they say on Japanese sites have alba very smooth outer black sling and only a slight bend on the inside on the VC http://outdoor.geocities.jp/nabenight/4ayasyaku.htm Here we have no alba, and many other species are absent, it is necessary to add

06.12.2014 18:21, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36154

Peter, fuck off, please, this elephant) I do not like very elegant pterophoridae))

06.12.2014 17:37, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #28441

Calyciphora nephelodactyla? At 8 registration only 2 species of the genus, the second - Calyciphora xanthodactyla - is extremely rare, and looks different.

06.12.2014 15:53, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36153

Notocelia roborana?

05.12.2014 16:23, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #35888

But he mothsofborneo on such a painted, with a bluish tinge http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-18/ariolicini/ariolicini_15_1.php, but they call it, as translated - deep (saturated) emerald - green (deep emerald green). Anyway, obviously not the same as in Paracrama dulcissima)

05.12.2014 16:08, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #35888

Dmitry, I see that the butterfly has moved, and yet - not quite understand what it does not fit on Chloriola gratissima of paragraphs 1 and 3? And what kind of gratissima - a photo or a photo of Basil link cat. I gave to gratissima? Especially do not understand the 3rd item ..

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.