E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33... 52

31.10.2014 11:54, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34718

Thank you, Dmitry, the word "problem" is guarded, but was not aware of) the evening will study in more detail.

31.10.2014 11:31, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34718

Dmitry, ariadne on Sinev in the Krasnoyarsk Territory is not marked, although the south is bordered by the edge resp.Tyva and Altai, and there have Ariadne. Location unknown fishing, Kr. Territory big) but I did not consider ariadne even so - though weak, but typical ariadne jagged edges bands on HCC do not have this copy.

30.10.2014 23:46, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34718

Parnassius phoebus

30.10.2014 23:21, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #9258

Species-aureum (c-gold), because With shaped as letters on the underside do not really white, and yellow (gold). It is really brilliant! In the photo, especially taken with a flash, it is not very noticeable, but it is alive with contrast and white can be seen well. It was one of my first questions when I saw her alive DV - and different from ours with white? :)) Explained.And another striking ...

29.10.2014 23:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #31368

Decide please, where to send the photo. If prof. K.A.Efetov wrote that you must study the genital apparatus, means the flight of time to select the type of Inope enough and determination may not be accurate.With regard Rhagades pruni, apparently, have to explain why the first comment has excluded it from consideration: this species - are not endemic to the Far East, and is widely distributed, it ...

28.10.2014 11:11, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #31368

Ure, hurry Pts., So briefly - at Rhagades pruni completely different color wings with metal. I shine, I reviewed a lot of them before in March to send a file to pruni K.A.Efetovu confirmation http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3803. With regard to the flight of time, I think that just in this case, it can serve as a defining feature of the two types of genital. My entomologich.knowledge and experience ...

28.10.2014 2:03, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #31368

Time of flight of these species took just out Zygaenidae, written by KA Efetov. According to these data maerens can not be at the beginning of June. Ure, and the file contains the date of the shooting was to Konstantin?

27.10.2014 17:21, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34677

Ochlodes subhyalina

27.10.2014 17:20, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34676

Seokia pratti, male subspecies S.p. eximia (Moltrecht, 1909)

27.10.2014 17:19, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34675

Araschnia burejana

27.10.2014 17:19, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34674

Pieris dulcinea, first generation

27.10.2014 11:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #16403

Well, thank you for the good advice, Peter! How had not guessed, because very friendly terms with the English)) .. Load - and a very different result, much clearer)

26.10.2014 23:58, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34628

author ispod to males is not set, correct, please

26.10.2014 23:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34662

Well this question to a group of authors) I just literally copied that in the end "Catalog ..." Ed. Sinev registered.

26.10.2014 23:36, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34662

Dmitri, in Sinev, which we here adhere to the form the explanation - "erroneous definition: baldus auct. (Nec Fabricius, 1775)"

26.10.2014 23:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34665

Glaucopsyche lycormas

26.10.2014 23:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34662

Ypthima argus

26.10.2014 23:23, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34663

Japonica lutea

26.10.2014 23:22, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34661

Celastrina ladonides

26.10.2014 23:21, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34660

Celastrina ladonides

26.10.2014 21:58, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #16403

Thank you all for a return to the topic! Sash, even when I asked the question in Google lepiforuma to load text, funny translation turned out), I confess, I am not fully comprehended then, today repeated in several translators - and like the clarity came. I think that the statement of Sergei, because I asked a question here (from 8.04), not quite correct.

26.10.2014 1:09, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34573

In comments to the author isNarope minor

25.10.2014 21:59, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #31368

I thinkInope heterogynaDIO-Procridinae detail view, even when dealt with Illiberis. It is not Illiberis, their wings translucent, not Jordanita paupera, whose head, chest and upper PC with metal block. shine, not Artona (Amuria) - they have a whitish-yellow spots on the wings, and, of course, not Rhagades pruni. Remains race Inope. According to the WFD Sinev 2 types - maerens and heterogyna. They ...

25.10.2014 21:45, Irina Nikulina: comment on Inope heterogyna

Peter, the search for Zygaenidae 40 regions this species is not to be. Need to add a Distribution. In Sinev it is for the Maritime Provinces.

25.10.2014 12:46, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34594

Parnassius stubbendorfiifemale

25.10.2014 12:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34592

Parnassius stubbendorfii, male, I think

25.10.2014 0:21, Irina Nikulina: comment on Hypomecis phantomaria

Note to the form Phthonosema phantomaria (deleted from the database 25.10.2014 1:50): In this view Sinev Hypomecis - http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/21666

24.10.2014 23:03, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #5769

Buck

24.10.2014 22:59, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #18317

Buck

24.10.2014 22:01, Irina Nikulina: comment on Olethreutes spiraeana

Peter, I can not but ask, why in both cases the left end - and , but not - us , in Sinev?

24.10.2014 20:27, Irina Nikulina: comment on Olethreutes spiraeana

The double type http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/20742. In Sinev - spiraean us .

24.10.2014 20:25, Irina Nikulina: comment on Olethreutes subtilana

This page must be removed, this type of double http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/20743. In Sinev - subtilan us

23.10.2014 13:28, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34405

Here http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/51_Tortricidae/5002%20Olethreutinae/framepage_olethreutinae2.htm and looked to insects of the Far East (v.5, p3, page 287) specified, except Europe, Japan, Korea, Mal. Asia

23.10.2014 13:14, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34405

Sash, perhaps, profundana not from Europe, because both types, there are closer, in Japan, for example, on imeyutsya- jpmoth both est.Pravda, there is something red on the back of the photo is not visible

21.10.2014 15:29, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #28978

I thinkTetheella fluctuosaOn RDV - subspecies isshikii Matsumura, 1921

21.10.2014 11:51, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34282

Only now with a clear conscience can be put into precise. Eugene A. Thank you.

21.10.2014 2:40, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34283

Larerannis orthogrammaria ?

20.10.2014 18:31, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34282

These things - where to transfer, in the exact or not - decides moderator. I wrote about his doubts minimal and justified them. Recommend moderating further action is absolutely necessary, I think. The point of citing unclear.

20.10.2014 18:21, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34282

What absolutely agree with is the fact that to carry into accurate if "behind" is looming at least one kind of unreviewed, do not. Even if minimal doubt) wanted here just to write about it, but refrained) instead threw in Agent Jure wish to ask about the type of E.A.Belyaeva elegans, it would be very interesting to see.A fagata nothing to do with, I realized that Alexander was simply talking ...

20.10.2014 16:41, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34282

Peter wanted to finish, in less than half an hour more, "Edit" button there. But the editing did not work (I tried 5 times) is appended here - in other species (at the same collection points) - 7 and 4 copies.

20.10.2014 16:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34297

What kind of did not write them is really only 2? Ptilophora jezoensis

20.10.2014 16:16, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34282

Sorry, no companies have been) The answer is - there is little doubt this, or minimal) Of course, other types of scanned or on one site, before writing, and doing it always. Relegata seen before, a lot of it in the network, wrote, and Yuri is very typical specimens. All the characteristics of the form there.Why still minimal doubt - images Operophtera elegans Beljaev, 1996 the network has not ...

20.10.2014 14:52, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34282

Operophtera relegata, not just on the network saw it in the fall, as well as our brumata c fagata

20.10.2014 1:18, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33729

Diarsia ruficaudahttp://rin.upgrade12.net/archives/2976/ found the same)) On RDV only in Primorye and lives

19.10.2014 22:06, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #32024

Aventiola pusilla

19.10.2014 14:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #31870

Vasily, thank you very much for defining refinement! So, picturedGhoria gigantea

19.10.2014 11:41, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #31870

Ghoria collitoides, probably. But there is apparently a very similar kind ofGhoria gigantea. Both types of litas. data found in Primorye. The size of adults does not differ according to the Japanese site. The image in the network tend to first. How to reliably distinguish between them and whether it is in appearance, I do not know. Ure, may be at the determinant look, I do not have all the ...

19.10.2014 11:37, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34245

Yesterday, too, it stopped on affinatana, left in the morning) They are very volatile, so that the wings can be shaped at a summer shades.

18.10.2014 18:14, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #31885

Very similar to pozhivshuyuArchips viola

18.10.2014 15:06, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #34240

Sash, too cautious, too, and looked before writing, these two. But emargana never seen such clear and thin horizontal lines are blurred. And all the revised (especially the Japanese) caerulescens white Zonke much wider. In the literature (from the review of Dubatolov tortricidae) and both types issikii caerulescens listed from Southern Primorye.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.