Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34... 52
With high probabilityAcleris issikiimet several times images, including here and http://homepage2.nifty.com/shikokuga/z42hamakiga http://www.jpmoth.org/Tortricidae/Tortricinae/Acleris_issikii.html .html. Perhaps, it can be inaccurate, given the number of species Acleris the RFE.
I would put to inaccurateEucosma hohenwartiana, live just these two butterflies (second today at the site set) different (I'm at it under the photos noted); it was time to consider them at night anywhere in no hurry)
And here still tend toEucosma hohenwartianadue sufficiently well-defined second dark area
Here of 2 possible options toEucosma canabow
I think it's not hohenwartiana, more like aEucosma conterminana
Pandemis dumetana, I guess. The remaining 5 DV-Pandemis also checked)
Of course, she knew, and did not have time, if you notice, informed Peter about the glitch in making information from Sinev. (I believe that such correspondence under the description of the type long and superfluous)
Yes, Peter, that's what I meant, t.k.stradaet catalog search, the parameters otbora- this taxon (b) and 8 th region. And add your own Inf. as I do about once learned in 2 years :)
Peter, in "rasprostanenie" (Russian Regions) have to add # 8 Central European (in Sinev it is)
Maybe it is uncertain in transfer? (other. photo of this individual is in swing.)
"Something very close" is also looking :). And from Udea nothing similar has not seen)
I reviewed all 10 LW Udea species and several species of the neighboring region. With a very high degree of confidence isUdea orbicentralis
Operophtera brumata? Is determined, taking into account specific features shown here http://www.lepiforum.de/forum.pl?md=read;id=34944 But both species in nature had not rented, so reinsured by placing question)
Operophtera fagata ?
Note to the form Operophtera bramata (removed from the base of 13.10.2014 10:53): Peter Incorrect spelling of the species. True br u mata. It should be combined with http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/5626
Thank you, Sasha, look in DV-Spilomelinae.
I can only assume (by exception), it may,Scoparia mandschurica. On RDV only 3 species Scoparia. I did not seem to like it and ancipitella nipponalis (their images on the network is). But mandschurica not found anywhere else, maybe someone saw?
Basil, my question was not why this photos without definition, and not about the authorship of the two definitions, and why all the other photos in the two types are defined in exactly?
I read the comments here and there was a question - why then all the photos on the website andDiarsia rubiandDiarsia floridastand in precisely defined? Including 2 pictures A. Ponomarev with the definition of AI Ustintseva.If everything is so hopeless, and the external differences between the two species is not present, then perhaps it would be logical to send all the photos in imprecisely ...
MaleArchips rosana?
I could not resist) Though too small, without tails closer to the fall ... But such beauty in the beauty!)
Sash, and geography?) Also doubt, but then looked - on the 37th Reg. I do not fly cinereana
Epinotia nisella ?
Crambus pascuella
Such a "mockery", Sash, met for the first time)) and therefore be safe diversana have never seen such a vast dark figure)
Catalog - reg. 10 - genus Erebia. Result - aethiops, afra, euryale, medusa, ligea
On WFD lives of all 3 types of family Peleopodidae, and only one - of the genus Acria, as already said Yuri. http://izumoga.com/saninmoth/ooegurihiratamaruhakibaga.htm
I do not have a picture of the top, and see when fly away, too, did not work - sitting high above the river
Peter, you need to divide this group of 5 photos of 4 different species
female
male
male
male
male
Basil and contradictions, then there is no, it is quite possible Cheremuhovo call) It is named for pruni old , which owns most of the forage plants caterpillars. A genus - Prunus. To him the main concern and KR - Prunus padus (Prunus Padus), and Prunus domestica (plum home), and Prunus spinosa (the turn ordinary)
Basil, correct immediately, please specify
male
female
male
male
male
A lot of time has passed, maybe until transfer to inaccurately defined or undefined?
Acropteris ciniferaria
Botyodes asialis
Most likely,Macrauzata submontana
From the 4 types Lophophelma with light zone at the apex inclined toLophophelma vigensIn the most extensive type of light area. http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/11_Lophophelma/Lophophelma%20vigens/Lophophelma%20vigens.htm
From 3 dark Tasta (total 7) likelyTasta montanaIn mothsofborneo external differences between species rather clearly spelled out. Montana is typical for a big round eye with a narrow yellow ring. Soveshenno not have a elliptica. Finds micaceata above 1200m there, but montana just dwells on high 1200-1900m above sea level
pomasia solutaris http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/09_Larentiinae/15_Pomasia/Pomasia%20salutaris/Pomasia%20salutaris.htm
Parotis marginata, most likely. http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/63_Crambidae/6109_Pyraustinae/610906400_Parotis/610906402_Parotis_marginata/Parotis_marginata.htm
Benbowia kiriakoff, is likely
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:10, A. Dymchenko: Пётр, да, она, спасибо. Там, как я...
- 18:43, A. Kuzmin: Ещё несколько перепонов из Амурской...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Streets: insects names
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Butterflies and music: The Cranberries, Just My Imagination
