Pages: 1 ...30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38... 52
I agree, it is better, more is better to specify a particular age if you know him- in appearance) There is likely to 3rd
I think the author wanted to say that this track does not reach the last age. Literally - "not fully grown up" (not ripe). "Immature" is not that a little bit, I think
Top only I saw a butterfly opened its wings for a moment looked over, as there http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Euchoeca_Nebulata. And underside very characteristic, I doubt minimal, but I hope to specialists.
This butterfly was smaller than http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30965 underside and less contrast ... zasomnevalas- notMelitaea aureliait? Or, again, athalia?
It alsoOligia strigilisThanks for defining Basil Sergienko. (I forgot to combine 2 images in the group)
Thank you) Many years of shooting in these places, met for the first time. As Euchoeca nebulata (if confirmed, she))
I know that a lot of ICAR website prostite- not resist :) I love this shot - sunny ... all nice sunny summer and new findings / discoveries / photo!)
I would put in inaccurateJaponica adustacvoi thoughts on this written here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6383/
I would put in inaccurateJaponica adustacvoi thoughts on this here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6383/ wrote to the correct definition does not insist, I am ready to discuss. Maybe someone knows the other differences between these two types?
The debate is already three years ago, saw the accident, but I want to add - to discuss - their views, although not resident) Butterflies those seen in nature, and in the collection, was interested in differences. The most significant (in appearance): 1. adusta always slightly larger (it is clear that this is not a sign of a photo) 2.background wings adusta (and top and underside) brighter shade ...