E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35... 52

29.09.2014 23:14, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33808

Daddala lucilla

29.09.2014 23:01, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33797

Flew probably (And I took out of the indefinite and claim) is true, then the same delved down)

29.09.2014 22:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29846

And I just think,Oroplema oyamana

29.09.2014 22:15, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #29993

Chrysocraspeda abhadraca http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=93512

29.09.2014 22:01, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33776

albomarginatus I immediately excluded)

29.09.2014 21:58, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33806

I thinkNordstromia duplicata

29.09.2014 21:25, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33776

Rhagastis castor, most likely. I consider and rubetra, but this image http://taibnet.sinica.edu.tw/chi/taibnet_addpicture3.php?name_code=347696&id=12041 prone to Castor)

29.09.2014 20:57, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33687

Agnidra fuscilinea

29.09.2014 20:27, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33817

:) Grow under the guidance of, reach for luminaries))

29.09.2014 20:04, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33817

Prochoreutis sehestediana? (had a little doubt, the view is very similar to myllerana, but there are brighter than white rice)

29.09.2014 17:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33813

I have it easy "in your face" I know)) The first non-small butterfly, stranded on the grid, on my first night LW Fotolia - impressed, the only type of its kind in the Russian Federation) There is the frame.

29.09.2014 16:23, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33814

Oreta pulchripes

27.09.2014 16:10, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33728

Thank you, Basil. In her thought, but something confused, reinsured. And about six months ago, the synonym asked here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/28061

26.09.2014 13:37, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #10778

Female

26.09.2014 13:36, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #10231

Female

26.09.2014 11:45, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #30405

Vasily, Dmitry, are you sure about the ID? I may be wrong but isn't this claretta? Podaliriata looks somehow different in tails http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=228393 Also mothsofborneo.com says clearly about distinctions in Diagnosis : http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Ourapterygini/ourapterygini_1_1.php

26.09.2014 11:35, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33673

I think Ourapteryx claretta

26.09.2014 1:49, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33672

Doubts between two (of three) Spaniocentra from Borneo, Spaniocentra lobata and endemic Spaniocentra apatelloides. Looking at how brown parts are spread, rather first one.

25.09.2014 12:45, Irina Nikulina: comment on Spilosoma lubricipeda

Note to the form Spilosoma lubricipedum (removed from the base of 26.09.2014 20:10): Peter, need to combine with this kind http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6680. The only difference in spelling lubricipeda (um)

25.09.2014 11:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on Macrochthonia

Peter, you need to combine this with the kind of http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/19040. The only difference in spelling Macrocht h onia / The Sinev - without h, the Japanese on funet.fi, GBIF.ORG and a number of others. Sites - with h

25.09.2014 11:06, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33508

Vasily, I don't insist on ID, just suppose... Still what about Japanese elegans may differ a lot compared to elegans from Borneo?) Please check the same Japanese, pics from Borneo: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/74_Geometridae/72.2_Ennominae/2729_Dilophodes_elegans/Dilophodes%20elegans.htm

24.09.2014 23:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33630

Spilarctia rubriventris

24.09.2014 22:36, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33508

Most probably Dilophodes elegans

24.09.2014 20:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #30427

Vasily, why the very meeki? Which sources you relied upon? Nothing possible to see on mothsofborneo.com, there are other websites though with quite clear descriptions of different features in these species. There is no dark grey line which is specific for meeki: http://www.papua-insects.nl/insect%20orders/Lepidoptera/Euteliidae/Euteliinae/Penicillaria/Penicillaria%20meeki.htm. Here is the ...

24.09.2014 18:00, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33595

When I press any of those, nothing happens (only shift to the very pic). Before everything worked fine, I edited couple of times my comments.

24.09.2014 17:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33595

Sadly last two days can't use "Edit" and "Delete" buttons as they don't function, so add, this is more often known as Dirades kosemponicola.

24.09.2014 17:41, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33595

I see another species, most likely Dysaethria kosemponicola

24.09.2014 12:57, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33606

Clostera anastomosis ?

24.09.2014 12:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33603

Clostera anastomosis ?

24.09.2014 12:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33601

Clostera anastomosis ?

23.09.2014 23:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33524

Pagyda salvalis

23.09.2014 23:03, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33562

Oppositely one of the most frequent finds in Anisimovka back then )

22.09.2014 17:01, Irina Nikulina: comment on Argyresthia

The subgenus shows pictures Heliconiinae. Peter, 2 lists with other non-conformity detected in the sent mail.

22.09.2014 15:58, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27947

And in my opinion, is not it. The author himself has defined and put in Psyche casta (et al. Photo), but asks to check for compliance with the mindRebelia herrichiella, and this is likely. Or others. View from Rebelia ... So, I think, will not have to endure

22.09.2014 13:35, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27947

There are 2 photos of the butterflies, we have already dealt with this. Second http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26121. We ought to leave one (the primary was just that). Here the formPsyche castamove, of course, if it is so. Photo right is available.

22.09.2014 3:52, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #20258

And this is notOstrinia nubilalis(even from others. Subfamily)?

21.09.2014 16:26, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33009

I would have said. that virgulata, wait for the verdict of experts.

20.09.2014 22:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #2040

And this is notThera variata?

20.09.2014 22:18, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #22232

ThisEcliptopera silaceataSee. photo in the group. Determined V. Sergienko

20.09.2014 20:02, Irina Nikulina: comment on Paratalanta ussurialis

Peter probably. This kind of double http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/40213. By Sinev rightParatalanta ussurialis(Bremer, 1864). Rod Paratalanta all need to understand. The website lacks the two species - Paratalanta jessica (Butler, 1878) and Paratalanta taiwanensis Yamanaka, 1972 (in both species have Sinev). But there is an incomprehensible Jessica taiwanensis Yamanaka, 1972. Rod Jessica in Sinev ...

20.09.2014 19:04, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33460

Gandaritis fixseniUre is not the same butterfly, as in the photo # 33461?

20.09.2014 19:00, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33461

Gandaritis fixseni

20.09.2014 12:58, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33350

The chief of the Butterfly House said they surely didn't have P. pitmani, only P. hipponous and Р. polytes. So the ID is right) Bit later about the original stuff.

20.09.2014 12:45, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33361

So I talked to the chief of the Butterfly House, they didn't receive M.helenor so far, will get later. These were M. peleides.

19.09.2014 23:15, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33451

Didn't colourized this. Probably the light is the thing.. It was quite dark, no sunshine, past 5... I've just checked other shots, different angles, less of this greeny tincture.

19.09.2014 23:01, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33451

Suprised... What's this "all"? I already added here aglaja from Far East http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/22032, or you meant this very specimen?

19.09.2014 21:16, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #32451

2 of 4 Stigmatophora species in Primorye clearly don't pass, 2 rest look quite alike but have distinctive features in underside and upperside forewings. They are described in V. V. Dubatolov's Guide to Lithosiinae: http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lithosiinae/Stigmatophora_flava.htm and http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lithosiinae/Stigmatophora_leacrita.htm So here's rather Stigmatophora leacrita (jpmoth describes ...

19.09.2014 13:49, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33422

I'd put to Argynnis adippe female, not sure though as it's Far East) Still it's tough to clear Far East adippe-like-xipe, coredippe, xanthodippe, vorax … The forewing pattern looks confusing at apex. I reread the whole old discussion http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=193914&st=50 beginning with adippe-like from Primorye added for ID ...

19.09.2014 13:46, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33349

Thanks to Evgeny, sure it's polyxenes. Hurried)

18.09.2014 22:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33409

Thanks for the answer, Basil. Yes, I have found here http://outdoor.geocities.jp/nabenight/4negurousubeninami.html unlike them underside (PC). But, unfortunately, I remove the underside failed, it would be interesting to make sure ..

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.