Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32... 52
Peter, then to the synonyms for the title should be corrected typos, should write = tschetverikovi. But in general the subspecies tschetverikovi (Kurentsov, 1936) in Sinev given to Neptis deliquata Stichel, 1908, and here on the site Neptis tschetverikovi Kurentzov, 1936 is a separate kind of http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120389.
Good flyNeptis andetria. From DV neptisov living in 40 reg., Only her white bar in the central cell PC is divided into 3 to 4 spots
Ochlodes ochracea
Glaucopsyche lycormas
Neptis ilos
Apatura schrenckii
Erynnis montanus
Papilio maackii
Neptis ilos
Satyrium herzi
Papilio xuthus
Well, and the page is not updated, while writing and copying Latin) Sorry, Dmitry already written.
And you can tell fortunes?) I wanted to write here that someone from Auzeinae, can be born Brachydecetia? (or Decetia?) abstained write, abandoned professionals)
Lomaspilis marginata
male
male
male
male
Hastening red wine :))
Andrew seems to have forgotten here is to link a group photo with the photo underside http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/13895 (these 2 photos put in the gallery Makrokluba and there they stand as a photo of one individual). And on the underside can be clearly seen that itNeptis ilos. Types ilos - thisbe - tshetverikovi well differ on the underside. And at the top ilos it is different from the last ...
I revised and vulcanea, all Lygephila 37th region. Of all DV-only view emaculata, who in the 40th, too, dwells nowhere found (according to VV Dubatolov this species was collected in the vicinity of Khabarovsk). You're right, Sasha, lies only vulcanea (again, as with Sesamia turpis, for Sinev seaside view is in the region of 37?).
Perhaps somehow missed ... Shamil rights -Lycaena helle, male (see. Photo in the group)
Sasha, come back here, forgotten about it) revised during this time rather than toSesamia turpisdo not lay down. Look one more time, please, I think your assumptions about it are true http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/3783_Sesamia/3783_Sesamia_turpis/Sesamia_turpis.html Or at least from Globia sparganii in swing. till
It's more of a femaleCelastrina ladonides(possibly saving generation. Volodya, it would be desirable to indicate the date of shooting) have a slightly different color pryeri, and ZK - quite clear bright field and there is a series of dark spots along the edge.
Sarbanissa sundanacite references, we have already discussed it - photo # 23481
Calpinae it. MaleOxyodes scrobiculata, I think
Now I agree), but do not really understand why you are in this case, since "good" comments about the pictures on mothsofborheo. In general, they are, of course, there are bad, but when it comes to comparing the two types, they are just a good idea to illustrate the main differences identified in Diagnosis - elongation of the PC at the apex and large concave distal border of the triangular patches ...
Troides rhadamantus?
Siproeta stelenes?
Papilio memnon (P. m. lowi Druce, 1873) ?
Dichagyris signifera?
Amphipyra tragopoginis?
Xestia baja?
I asked cautiously about the kind korintjiensis - http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=224758 (of the peninsula. Malaysia has charges) Externally very similar to pertendens and reliably distinguished only genital, here in the Diagnosis of this and written http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/hulodini/hulodini_4_7.php Maybe not worth it in the exact place, ...
Svetlana, to determine the kind of there, where this "quote" (picture # 34868) is a Habitat preference could play only a supporting role in all, everything is determined underside. In addition to mothsofborneo, from this observation is taken, it does not say that there rafflesii only in the plains, and viridiluteata only in the mountains. It says - especially, basically, more ..But perhaps, ...
Do not mind the change in the definition of authorship, for me it is absolutely not important, the main thing that was correct. But I note that all the time we come back to the discussion of the algorithm proposed here by Peter http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30976, and not once have discussed these points, for example, there http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33350. So I do not really understand your ...
Yes, it is meant, referring to mothsofborneo, in Diagnosis just given it compares. LC analysis underside. The underside PC also differs in these species, but not so clearly. In addition, there is also noted that rafflesii prefers mostly lowland and viridiluteata - alpine forest.
Why not viridiluteata? On what grounds do you it has identified as rafflesii? I not disputed, I just want to clarify. Today, there is no way to understand in detail, but I know that mothsofborneo differences between these two kinds of good indicated in the Diagnosis.
I decided to still see what's "mystique" was. All four species are on mothsofborneo, there is enough detail their differences. In bipardaria narrow and dark gray sling, monopardaria bipardaria very similar to, but the main color is paler still have a sling.In runctipardaria altipardaria sling and paler and wider, but runctipardaria differs from the other 3 types of the largest black points (this ...
Why synonymous? Maybe I missed something in the discussion? Holloway 4 species described in 1982 "Holloway (1982) revalidated genus Borbacha Moore and described four new species from Borneo ie, monopardaria, bipardaria, punctipardaria and altipardaria" Here in detail about the kind of Borbacha, since 1887 http: //shodhganga.inflibnet. ac.in/bitstream/10603/2894/11/11_chapter%204.pdf
Leucomelas juvenilis
Antigius butleri
Artopoetes pryeri
Sericinus montela
Bibasis aquilina
Papilio demoleus
Papilio memnon (P. m. lowii Druce, 1873) ?
Basil, perhaps you have in mind your definition here is another photo - http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32122?
Thank Basil for a reference to the collection, I agree with all - viciae it (someone will be interested - the form confusa on the 18th page)
Basil yesterday because of problems with an Internet did not have time to bind to the group, do it now and read a dialogue asking barred one year under the photo the same individual. Then you're confident enough to write that "except minos such a blur, and there should not be anyone in the Kaluga region."I returned to it more than once a year, were some doubts and decided to add a photo. Let's ...
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:10, A. Dymchenko: Пётр, да, она, спасибо. Там, как я...
- 18:43, A. Kuzmin: Ещё несколько перепонов из Амурской...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Butterflies and music: Motors, Butterfly
