Photo #32281: Eucosma hohenwartiana

18.10.2014 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Not identified → Eucosma hohenwartiana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.10.2014 13:34, Irina Nikulina

I would put to inaccurateEucosma hohenwartiana, live just these two butterflies (second today at the site set) different (I'm at it under the photos noted); it was time to consider them at night anywhere in no hurry)

18.10.2014 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov

I can not distinguish between these two types of visual, here the words of the authors of photos, they have seen them live without these two types of cooking only inaccurate. :)))

16.08.2014 23:02, Irina Nikulina

Thank you, Alexander. I do not know, unfortunately, that the more customary for the Kaluga region, looked in detail all the pictures, and to me it seems in some respects more like hohenwartiana. Of course, I could be wrong, waiting for the verdict)

09.08.2014 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Somehow I leanedEucosma cana, but there really is "dark forest" ...
Alexander, the right choice for you :)

08.08.2014 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Here are thank you for it (I confess, myself on the phone today and did not look all comments). Tomorrow I checked: I once again have a good 8 infa.

08.08.2014 17:37, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Ancylis apicella / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Not identified.

08.08.2014 17:37, Alexandr Zhakov

That's right, this moth, and even the subfamily Olethreutinae, but the tribe is another Eucosmini, but the view and I do not say can Eucosma hohenwartiana, rather Eucosma cana. there in the Kaluga region more common.

07.08.2014 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov

It's apicella I bet. It has seen better days though. Moved to tentatively identified.

07.08.2014 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Not identified → Ancylis apicella / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.