Insecta.pro Community

19.09.2018 22:50, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #13502

This species is identified correctly.

06.01.2014 0:37, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #6784

This species is identified correctly.

30.12.2013 18:35, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3342

Concerning Polia nebulosa, take a look at the site www.lepiforum.de for this species. I am missing the dark stripes on the flanks and also the diamond-shaped pattern on top.

30.12.2013 18:12, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #2604

This is not Saturium spini, it is a completly different species. I will try to find it when I am done with uploading later.

25.12.2013 13:59, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3342

For sure this it is not Thyatira batis. That is a complete other species that you will find almost only on plants of stinging nettle (Urtica). That is my experience from north-east Poland. (Urtica)

25.12.2013 13:50, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3342

Take a look at my website: www.natuurfotografiejan.nl. I photographed three different species which are all very different.

25.12.2013 13:45, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #25354

Excuse for my comments, I thought I looked at the map with uncertain cases.

24.12.2013 19:41, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3342

I think this is Dypterygia scabriuscula.

24.12.2013 19:35, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3366

Zygaena lonicerae for sure I think

24.12.2013 19:32, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #5566

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:32, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3443

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:31, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3618

Sideridis rivularis

24.12.2013 19:27, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9956

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:27, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9955

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:26, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9770

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:26, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9852

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:25, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9973

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:24, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9851

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:23, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9953

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:18, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #25354

In my opinion all pictures from Andrey Ponomarev, concerning Eurois occulta, are correctly indentified. The whole series.

24.12.2013 19:16, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #25353

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:15, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #25354

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:15, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #25350

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:10, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #11760

Syngrapha microgamma looks very much like this.

24.12.2013 19:02, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3691

Cucullia asteris, please provide possibility to enlarge the picture. But for 98% sure.

24.12.2013 18:55, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3412

Antitype chi, without any doubt. 100%

24.12.2013 18:44, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #10658

Phragmatobia fuliginosa I think.

24.12.2013 18:42, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #6485

I think this is Phragmatobia fuliginosa. If possible, please provide the opportunity to enlarge the photo.

19.11.2013 22:57, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #10179

This species is identified correctly.

Leucanella aspera Felder, 1874

Saturniidae

Chorosoma macilentum Stål, 1858

Rhopalidae

Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, 1855

Dryophthoridae

Dorytomus leucophyllus Motschulsky, 1845

Curculionidae

Noterus japonicus Sharp, 1873

Noteridae