Insecta.pro Community

19.09.2018 22:50, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #13502

This species is identified correctly.

06.01.2014 0:37, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #6784

This species is identified correctly.

30.12.2013 18:35, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3342

Concerning Polia nebulosa, take a look at the site www.lepiforum.de for this species. I am missing the dark stripes on the flanks and also the diamond-shaped pattern on top.

30.12.2013 18:12, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #2604

This is not Saturium spini, it is a completly different species. I will try to find it when I am done with uploading later.

25.12.2013 13:59, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3342

For sure this it is not Thyatira batis. That is a complete other species that you will find almost only on plants of stinging nettle (Urtica). That is my experience from north-east Poland. (Urtica)

25.12.2013 13:50, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3342

Take a look at my website: www.natuurfotografiejan.nl. I photographed three different species which are all very different.

25.12.2013 13:45, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #25354

Excuse for my comments, I thought I looked at the map with uncertain cases.

24.12.2013 19:41, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3342

I think this is Dypterygia scabriuscula.

24.12.2013 19:35, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3366

Zygaena lonicerae for sure I think

24.12.2013 19:32, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #5566

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:32, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3443

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:31, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3618

Sideridis rivularis

24.12.2013 19:27, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9956

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:27, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9955

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:26, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9770

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:26, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9852

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:25, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9973

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:24, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9851

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:23, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #9953

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:18, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #25354

In my opinion all pictures from Andrey Ponomarev, concerning Eurois occulta, are correctly indentified. The whole series.

24.12.2013 19:16, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #25353

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:15, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #25354

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:15, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #25350

This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:10, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #11760

Syngrapha microgamma looks very much like this.

24.12.2013 19:02, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3691

Cucullia asteris, please provide possibility to enlarge the picture. But for 98% sure.

24.12.2013 18:55, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #3412

Antitype chi, without any doubt. 100%

24.12.2013 18:44, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #10658

Phragmatobia fuliginosa I think.

24.12.2013 18:42, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #6485

I think this is Phragmatobia fuliginosa. If possible, please provide the opportunity to enlarge the photo.

19.11.2013 22:57, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #10179

This species is identified correctly.

Bruchidius villosus Fabricius, 1792

Chrysomelidae

Calliptamus barbarus Costa, O.G. 1836

Acrididae

Chrysomya albiceps Wiedemann, 1819

Calliphoridae

Vespa orientalis Linnaeus, 1761

Vespidae

Plebejus zamotajlovi (Shchurov & Lukhtanov, 2001)

Lycaenidae