Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416... 627

09.09.2014 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2953

Do not delete. It was a double best picture and I changed it. The point is that when the goods have not yet had the opportunity to replace :)

09.09.2014 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33200

Alexander, a small question. You are in the background that you use? For a long time I want to go to a black background, but I can not find the optimal solution. A plan to replace, complete and ahead of winter, when there is time to do it.

09.09.2014 17:51, Troglodit: comment on Bibliography

Dear colleagues!Biographical and Bibliographic Reference Book of Russian Lepidopterologists is being prepared for publicationYou should probably put this in a separate topic, here the message risks going unnoticed

09.09.2014 17:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33180

Corrected data.

09.09.2014 16:36, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #33179

Rubbish poudalyal. With regard to the uniformity of writing subspecies: the very fact that it is written in a separate line in the free form has a defect site. Will do option to foty can be fastened to the same subspecies, not only to species. This is the future. And now everyone can write as it sees fit.Just do not forget that this field to clarify the classification and not the stage of ...

09.09.2014 8:56, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #31413

Corrected data. Phengaris arion / Shamil Murtazin → Plebejus argus / Eugene Karolinskiy.

09.09.2014 8:56, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #31412

Corrected data. Phengaris arion / Shamil Murtazin → Plebejus argus / Eugene Karolinskiy.

09.09.2014 7:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29522

As a postscript: I understand of course that can be useful to determine the type, for example, in the field (where the Internet is not always and not at all). But why in such quantities. I think that they have already played a role in determining a particular butterfly and should remove excess, leaving one photo. Of course, if Andrew will not mind :)

09.09.2014 5:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33181

Corrected data.

09.09.2014 5:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33182

Corrected data.

09.09.2014 1:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33189

Corrected data. Not identified → Thymelicus sylvestris / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

09.09.2014 0:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33183

Corrected data. Not identified → Argynnis aglaja / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

09.09.2014 0:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Cydalima moth destroys the Yew-and-Boxwood Tree Grove in Sochi, Russia

Sorry for off-top, I'm still mainly Coleoptera man :) Insects happen to change behaviour in new area. Just an example. There was peaceful ordinary Leptinotarsa decimlineata Say. which fed on solanaceous and did no any harm. At the end of 19th century it spread over France and little by little all over and became famous dreadful potato pest. So far no effective measures found against this ...

08.09.2014 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #30949

Forced the process. Congrats with a new species, guys :)

08.09.2014 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #30947

Corrected data. Not identified → Asota contorta / Confidently identified / Grigoriy Grigoriev.

08.09.2014 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #30948

Corrected data. Not identified → Asota contorta / Confidently identified / Grigoriy Grigoriev.

08.09.2014 21:32, Lev Bely: comment on photo #33059

Irina, thanks, glad to see you too! Doesn't that nasty, just hungry as dog:)

08.09.2014 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #30950

Corrected data. Not identified → Asota contorta / Confidently identified / Grigoriy Grigoriev.

08.09.2014 16:41, Yopidou: comment on Entomology stores

Dear nnsb, Ethyl acetate 0.90 kg (1000 ml) was purchased. The first time last year, there are no complaints about it. The" poorly performing " ethyl acetate was purchased in April 2014 (most likely the previous batch). If necessary, I can bring it to the fair with the appropriate checks.

08.09.2014 14:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11249

Photos are not grouped and moved according to the author's remark.

08.09.2014 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11248

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

08.09.2014 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11247

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

08.09.2014 0:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33134

Corrected data. Not identified → Zygaena viciae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.09.2014 22:03, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33174

Corrected data. Not identified → Staurophora celsia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.09.2014 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #31922

Could be this. However, I see it as miniata male. I upped this a week ago without moving. Yesterday I did where thought reasonable. Miniata can be pale as well. If I was wrong, please move where you think it should be. Would be great though to get some reaction to my 19:18 27/08/2014 request. No offense :)

07.09.2014 15:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33172

Didn't have time.... Seems got it for the first time here :)

07.09.2014 15:33, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33173

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

07.09.2014 15:33, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33169

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

07.09.2014 12:31, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33148

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Lycaena tityrus / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Lender.

07.09.2014 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #31404

Corrected data. Not identified → Incurvaria oehlmanniella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.09.2014 8:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28455

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

06.09.2014 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4936

Well can't stop bother :) Originally here was the remark in the classification field, "Probably orange variation of erate, hyale or sareptensis" Not croceus, is it? No courage to move it to not identified.....

06.09.2014 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33153

Let the expert in microleps says his word :) Here in 8th region we got 20 species of Dichrorampha, so I named most likely by appearance, further I surrender.

06.09.2014 21:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33144

Can be but the dark fringe is kinda confusing, also mouthparts and the central dark spot shape.

06.09.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33141

Underside also vitally needed here :)

06.09.2014 21:06, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33150

Corrected data. Not identified → Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

06.09.2014 21:04, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33152

Corrected data. Not identified → Plodia interpunctella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.09.2014 21:01, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33151

Corrected data. Not identified → Plusia putnami / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.09.2014 19:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33131

Corrected data. Not identified → Xestia baja / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.09.2014 17:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33052

To Alexandr Belousov: may I remind that the classification specification field is used for subspecies data, also form and age. E.g., "light form" or "third age larva". Person who identified specimen should be noted in the field for additional info. E.g., "specimen raised of larva" or "identified by pic" or any other additional data.

06.09.2014 16:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33053

Petr, I already checked that, that wasn't me. Alexandr added this to ID as questionable 16/08/2014 on molbiol.ru and Vasily Sergienko confirmed the ID.