Insecta.pro Community
Lampides boeticus (LINNAEUS, 1767)
Horisme tersata Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775
Aglossa dimidiatus (Haworth, 1809)
Smerinthus ocellatus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Smerinthus ocellatus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Scopula immutata (Linnaeus, 1758)
This species is identified correctly.
Размах крыльев какой?
Amphipyra pyramidea (Linnaeus, 1758)
Spilosoma punctarium (Stoll, [1782]).
Spilosoma sp.
Amurilla subpurpurea (Butler, 1881).
Etiella zinckenella Treitschke, 1832.
Laodamia faecella (Zeller, 1839)
Boloria thore.
Wingspan 22 mm. If it's necessary, I can upload a clearer photo, but I just don’t see the point in straightening the specimen out again.
Yes, it's not good.
Caradrina terrea (tentatively). Identified by Balàzs Benedek
This is Glaucopsyche alexis (Poda, 1761). Please, transfer it to this species.
It turns out that it is not in the catalog of the Russian Lepidoptera in the 2nd edition in the 17th Russian region, but in fact there it is)?
Actually, we can wait. I also wrote to the S. Korb. Maybe he will answer.
Ok. Then move her to semiagruses).
According to our 17 Russian region, semiargus is Ok I was informed. But I would also like to look at Northern Kazakhstan and North-Western Kazakhstan. What kind of literature would you recommend?
And what does it look more like?
Aricia persephatta (Alphéraky, 1881)? Moreover, Kazakhstan is nearby here.
Is there any algorithm for identification species at such photos? Or is it unrealistic?
Well, clearly). The size was not specified and the scales were misleading.
The picture is not too clear and it's too heavily retouched in my opinion, but I guess it's Eriocrania salopiella (STAINTON, 1854) (tentatively).
Apparently Ematurga atomaria (Linnaeus, 1758).
Well, it's like Euplagia quadripunctaria (Poda, 1761)
So this is Pseudophilotes bavius? Is it possible to determine exactly from this photo, or will it hang in inaccurate ones?
Vanessa cardui.
Or maybe it's a subspecies of arachnocepta?
Galleria mellonella apparently?
Well, do you have any thoughts on this?
OK.
Identified on December 12, 2017 as Laodamia faecella on molbiol ento forums by vidjl (Alexander).
the year of capture is certainly not 2030).
)
Thank you, Alexander.
Any thoughts on this?
Thank you all for your help in identification).
The size is really 48mm, there was no special extra work, it was just an improvement in the image, it looks like it’s really A. monoglypha), thanks).
It is not similar to any of those found in our region).
at least genus or what versions are there?
Yes, I wanted to write candidella, I just got distracted and wrote another one, thank you)
понятно,спасибо)
Александр,так в чем генитальная загвоздка между дедуктой и елокатой?Ты же варил,знаешь.
ладно в следующий раз кадрирую а Владу спс.
Epicallia villica думаю.
News
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
- 28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
- 19.03.2024: Insecta.pro and the entomological forum Integration
New photos (19.04.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:03, P. Khramov: A nice video from 2004 with Oleg Go...
- 13:02, P. Khramov: Bombus → Bombus sylvestris....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Butterflies and music: Ray Campi's rockabilly 50 years later
