Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391... 629
On mothsofborneo several. It looked to me most of all :)
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
All species of this genus, as the pitch of the upper wing, the lower slightly different, not something specific: yes or no I can not say.
Why can not tolerate that? ..
Jan, this shot is taken at Russian Far East. The species' looks are different there.
Basil, if I'm not sure that male or female, you can not stand. :))
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
It looks like that does not immediately found. But calm would leave is now.
Define the following link: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/45_THYRIDOIDEA/Thyrididae/61.1_Striglininae/70_Monodecus/Monodecus%20capillatus/Monodecus%20capillatus.htm I put in yet inaccurate and need more opinions. While virtually assured of correctness. Until recently it was considered a subspecies of butterfly species Monodecus admirandus: ...
Merge http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/7134
07.11.2014 17:05 Alexander Zhakov ... In the future, please, put in the definition of the Latin names that have not been dvoechteniya. :)) And then I would have had before:)) Of course before, no doubt - because in Latin, I would have written before the Second Coming. Thank you.
Boursin Stas was written in the admin., When the photo was there, and then the math is simple: on the site in this genus species described this man go under the name Boursin : Cryphia sugitanii Boursin, 1961 ; Cryphia bryophasma (Boursin, 1951) ; Cryphia amygdalina (Boursin, 1963) ; Cryphia ochsi (Boursin, 1940) :) So it is necessary to correct: these are no coincidences.
Corrected data. → Stan Korb.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Not identified → Celypha flavipalpana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Aricia artaxerxes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Female / Andrei Komrakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Plebejus pseudaegon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Plebejus pseudaegon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Plebejus subsolanus / Confidently identified / Stan Korb.
Corrected data. Yuri Semejkin → Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Erynnis montanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Satyrium herzi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Neptis ilos / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Neptis ilos / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Neptis andetria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Delias hyparete / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Omorgus suberosus Fabricius, 1775Argentina, Salta, Chicoana, 9.II.2013, K. Tomkovich
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
None of this kind in Israel
Corrected data. Not identified → Plebejus idas / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Ochlodes ochracea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Glaucopsyche lycormas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Forgot to choose: Deilephila elpenor
Corrected data. Not identified → Oressinoma typhla / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Portrait :) The idea can be removed if found true. Androkonii surezno and more than remarkable. Maybe it will tip some? It seems that somewhere saw like, but I can not remember (
This, apparently, a double page http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23209?
Peter, then to the synonyms for the title should be corrected typos, should write = tschetverikovi. But in general the subspecies tschetverikovi (Kurentsov, 1936) in Sinev given to Neptis deliquata Stichel, 1908, and here on the site Neptis tschetverikovi Kurentzov, 1936 is a separate kind of http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120389.
Corrected data. Not identified → Apatura schrenckii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Papilio maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Andrey Proplyetkin → Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Neptis thisbe / Andrey Proplyetkin → Neptis ilos / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Polyommatus thersites / Pavel Ivanov → Polyommatus icarus / Alexandr Zhakov.
Aglais ioPvavliny eyes. Vladimir, well that you really? This is the same in Europe the most famous butterfly :)
Very original cloth: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Рогоз Straight comes to mind is that the "upside down" hung up :) I Fill: I have all the swamp near the house closer to the fall in such "rags" :)
Yes they are the same everywhere :) Just aglitskim problem as posted below ..... Moreover, biological, where he goes often mixed with Latin :)
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
News
- 31.12.2024: Если нужно загрузить на сайт много фотографий
- 10.12.2024: Новое поле в «Поиске энтомологов»
- 05.12.2024: Insecta.pro maps: filter by taxon
New photos (01.02.2025)
Fresh from the community
- 16:33, d. andreev: Здравствуйте уважаемые специалист...
- 0:24, V. Titov: Я бы по фото до вида даже пытаться ...
- 12:03, M. Niobius: PS чисто по фото в сети ближе Chole...
Popular insects
