Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152... 627

01.03.2016 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Casminola pulchella

Corrected data. Casminola pulchella Leech, 1889 → (Leech, 1889).

01.03.2016 16:00, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Meganola mikabo

The taxons were merged. Meganola mikabo and Rhynchopalpus mikabo were merged.

01.03.2016 15:58, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Manoba harthani

The taxons were merged. Manoba harthani and Rhynchopalpus harthani were merged.

01.03.2016 15:56, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #53665

Corrected data. Curculionidae / Ivan Pristrem → Tychius quinquepunctatus / Evgeny Komarov.

01.03.2016 15:56, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Meganola gigas

Corrected data. Rhynchopalpus gigas (Butler, 1884) → Meganola gigas (Butler, 1884).

01.03.2016 15:55, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Meganola fumosa

Corrected data. Rhynchopalpus fumosa (Butler, 1879) → Meganola fumosa (Butler, 1879).

01.03.2016 15:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Meganola costalis

The taxons were merged. Meganola costalis and Rhynchopalpus costalis were merged.

01.03.2016 15:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Meganola bryophilaris

Corrected data. Rhynchopalpus bryophilaris (Staudinger, 1887) → Meganola bryophilaris (Staudinger, 1887).

01.03.2016 15:42, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Meganola brunella

Corrected data. Meganola brunella Hampson 1893 → (Hampson 1893).

01.03.2016 15:34, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Meganola basifascia

The taxons were merged. Meganola basifascia and Rhynchopalpus basifascia were merged.

01.03.2016 15:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #53755

Corrected data. Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Loxostege sticticalis / Evgeny Komarov.

01.03.2016 15:31, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Manoba banghaasi

The taxons were merged. Manoba banghaasi and Meganola banghaasi were merged.

01.03.2016 15:24, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Meganola argentalis

Corrected data. Meganola argentalis Moore 1867 → (Moore 1867).

01.03.2016 15:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #53622

I also consulted. :) Other systems treat differently, but probably it is necessary to agree with Matt and Kononenko and combine these two kinds. To avoid duplicates, I unite and brush my doubles.

01.03.2016 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Aegosoma scabricorne

Corrected data. Aegosoma scabricorne Scopoli, 1763 → (Scopoli, 1763).

01.03.2016 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53749

Corrected data. Tentatively identified / Imago → Confidently identified / Male.

01.03.2016 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53748

Corrected data. Tentatively identified / Imago → Confidently identified / Male.

01.03.2016 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53687

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

01.03.2016 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53751

Corrected data. Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow → Prismognathus subaeneus / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.03.2016 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53752

Corrected data. Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow → Prismognathus subaeneus / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.03.2016 12:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #53723

Basil, Mr. Shaw are you surezno Sedna?))

01.03.2016 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53746

Corrected data. Imago → Male & female.

01.03.2016 10:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53741

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

01.03.2016 10:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53740

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

01.03.2016 2:56, Peter Khramov: comment on Updated the "My Subscriptions" section of the forum

By the way, those who are there on the site is not particularly regularly, but is it a significant number of comments and / or photos, I highly recommend this section (My News) to quickly navigate especially in the comments of those that concern you.

01.03.2016 1:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #53512

Wudi of the frame!

01.03.2016 1:02, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #53720

Lord, but please check the other beetles have been laid out Zoran, if such a thing. Suddenly, even where errors. There they (the beetles) is a little ...

01.03.2016 0:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Callidea

Corrected data. Calidea de Laporte, 1832 → Callidea de Laporte, 1832.

01.03.2016 0:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Scutellerinae

Corrected data. Scutellerinae Leach 1815 → Scutellerinae Leach, 1815.

29.02.2016 22:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #53310

By the way, yes. Perhaps, in such cases it is necessary to reduce Fautua ... What do you think, John?

29.02.2016 21:49, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #53722

A bit like a Orthogonius suturalis Chaudoir, 1871 http://carabidae.org/carabidae/Orthogonius%20suturalis%206986.jpg, but there is something close.

29.02.2016 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53718

Corrected data. Morimus asper → Morimus asper funereus.

29.02.2016 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53713

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

29.02.2016 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53712

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

29.02.2016 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53711

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

29.02.2016 19:40, ИНО: comment on Mass breeding of collemboli (Tula region)

This video was discussed on the forum more than once. This behavior is characteristic of many species of several different genera. Defining this video is a cool task for the "Battle of Psychics".

29.02.2016 19:16, Ivan Pristrem: comment on photo #52948

Yes. I too have overturned beetles. As long as they have me stand on the meaning of "underside".

29.02.2016 19:15, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #53608

Yes, you can find something in the garbage and the more Cleonina. Kazakhstan and later in Asia, the main area. I found a couple of times in the Volga for a long time. Oh, I do not understand, I was already determined to five hours? It fell off, or what? Now again!

29.02.2016 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53697

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

29.02.2016 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53698

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

29.02.2016 18:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53700

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

29.02.2016 18:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #53701

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

29.02.2016 17:48, Ivan Pristrem: comment on photo #53556

it was very difficult with this photo. That photo shot with a flash, and that - no, a color rendition at the camera, which foty these have been removed, in general any strange. When natural light normally takes places, sometimes - not. On this particular photograph color butterflies generally had some pink and purple.I tried to bring the color closer to the picture with the flash, but still not ...

29.02.2016 17:42, Ivan Pristrem: comment on photo #53614

With this particular photo that something terrible had happened, because its data is any there in October 2014, but I do remember that this beetle was shooting in the summer at the cottage. Most likely, this is the beginning of 2013. Although not exactly vouch.