Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Oh, how - almost simultaneously.
Maybe it's some kind of Lyssa zampa?
Like and Argus, but not at the brilliant blue spots along the outer edge on the underside.
Yeah, thanks a lot!
No, I'm all windows inserts one number, which is to combine all the pictures, but two photos caterpillars, once linked together in one group, for some reason this does not apply, and they remain separate from the hatched from it a butterfly, and along with the pupae.
IV instar (on the head "horns").
I wanted to make a large group, but does not go to sit down here two more rooms - 23258 and 23336
The color and brilliance of certain mottled.
Yes, she is! ..
I noted that on the very upload (there's also such feature)
I seem to have done that already. Maybe didn't work somewhere?
:-))
Should be Sergey Didenko then.
Was IDed on molbiol by Sergey (?)
Identified by Sergey (?)
Identified by S. Kotov.
Identified by S. Knyazev.
They said on molbiol that this one was seitzi, of the same genus
Whoah, what a merry villica!
Might it be the same, only worn-out?
Can there be something but ocellata in Poland?
Rhyparia amurensis. Maybe there is some more adequate its name.
Share on definition. Take a doubt due to the blurred picture of the front wings (rather spotty).
Whoops, where it's happened to have come by!
This photo is also there (in forficalis). Vitaly Ivanovitch seems to have secured ;)
Looks similar to Evergestis forficalis
Is it really the same species?
Wow, what a great red tincture it has! Is it possible to get it artificially?
I hardly can clear this up as I got this moth with some peculiar "label" attached, showing only some number, notebook by which was obviously lost.
Here is the cracker!..
Macroglossum corythus ?
Macroglossum corythus, probably? http://www1.ala.org.au/gallery2/v/Sphingidae/Macroglossumcorythus/macroglossum_corythus_01.jpg.html
You bet!
This is probably Rhagades pruni ?
This could be taken as a video, theoretically. But I wasn't ready for they behaved like that and it happened quite quickly.
To add aforesaid, if someone added genitalia pics of species with similar exterior (don't consider machaon), would be great. Just an addition to ideas.
Looks similar to Siproeta stelenes
Well why, can be some Lymantria.
@m>Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов
And the hair bundles of warts as well?
Tyk, at the same Well warts, while others do not have.
Maybe Bella
I agree!
I do not know. I used to like, these are not met.
I can some subspecies?
Perhaps aurate it.
Oh, it seems to me, I was wrong. I think it aurate.
So Acontia sp. Obviously relative trabealis
Yes, live butterflies is really needed skill!
A copy of, unfortunately, not yet, but only sfotkatsya. So they have no external differences there?
Next page