E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104... 145

16.07.2012 14:13, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9645

Svetlana, so the "croco" finally emerged or not? The species name needed...

16.07.2012 14:13, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9565

Goes to.

16.07.2012 14:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9545

Moved to X. albonotaria "uncertain". Other versions still welcomed.

16.07.2012 14:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9401

Enough to move it to "uncertain"? Sitting rather odd.

16.07.2012 14:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9379

Same question.

16.07.2012 14:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9375

The same question as of the neighbouring photo.

16.07.2012 14:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9370

To sinapis "uncertain" or not? Furthermore, there is no any juvernica in the website taxonomy. Thus the same Fauna has it neither...

16.07.2012 14:07, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8486

One more species I can't consider where it's from. Or is it some synonym again?

16.07.2012 14:06, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8434

To S. caricaria "uncertain". Svyatoslav, please approve or deny?

16.07.2012 14:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8379

Moved to Zygaena lonicerae "uncertain" so far.

16.07.2012 14:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8279

Any conclusion is needed.

16.07.2012 14:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8278

Guys, what's on?

16.07.2012 14:01, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8103

What's this species in fact? There should be its synonym on the website, supposedly, can't see it though.

16.07.2012 13:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8101

Moved.

16.07.2012 13:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8100

So do we finally move it and where we actually do?

16.07.2012 13:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3445

To "uncertain".

16.07.2012 13:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3509

Goes to.

16.07.2012 13:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5004

Moved to S. stimulea "uncertain".

16.07.2012 13:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6481

Moved.

16.07.2012 13:54, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7032

Moved to "uncertain".

16.07.2012 13:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6390

Goes to.

16.07.2012 13:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7162

Moved.

16.07.2012 13:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6388

Moved.

16.07.2012 13:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3649

Goes to.

16.07.2012 13:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7973

Just moved.

16.07.2012 13:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7160

Guys, could we already get it done, huh?..

16.07.2012 13:36, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6369

Yury, what's the species anyway?

16.07.2012 13:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5038

So to be moved to "uncertain" or "undetermined" so far?

16.07.2012 13:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3692

Any versions more?

16.07.2012 13:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3673

So what, not even anything "uncertain"?

16.07.2012 1:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13771

Ok then, moved.

15.07.2012 12:41, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13768

Moved.

14.07.2012 23:41, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13768

S. pavonia too?

14.07.2012 23:38, Peter Khramov: comment on Sericinus montela

Et they demorfizm such powerful?

14.07.2012 12:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13719

Moved.

14.07.2012 12:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13711

Moved to "identified successfully".

13.07.2012 22:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13695

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13700.

13.07.2012 22:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13696

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13700.

13.07.2012 22:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13697

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13700.

13.07.2012 22:13, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13700

Goes to.

13.07.2012 22:13, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13701

Moved.

13.07.2012 16:20, Peter Khramov: comment on Nola chlamitulalis

We will correct, as the form will finish.

13.07.2012 16:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13728

Nice guys.

13.07.2012 16:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13735

Oleg, if it was actually identified, what's about the very name of the species?

10.07.2012 19:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #11876

Moved. Is that they could be either yellow?

10.07.2012 19:29, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13617

Moved.

10.07.2012 13:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13693

Moved the photo. As for species descriptions, those which we've got now (save the catalogue search parameters) are pretty better than to have nothing. Actually, there was a form for adding new data with references that I'll make enabled soon. It was originally supposed to add distinctive features as parameters, though there can be some separate section for such content. What do you all think? Or ...

09.07.2012 23:22, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13683

Now to "identified successfully".

09.07.2012 21:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13683

Yury, I put it to "uncertain" so far.

09.07.2012 17:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13653

Thanks for the correction, goes to Brenthis ino ward.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.