Pages: 1 ...27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35... 144
Clear. Other options are not visible, although Gluck with the authors and the truth is not clear. Rather, the problem at the source.
Fixed. Still a time to remind you that comments that relate to the form, written on the page of the form, not on the page foty.
Verbs that Ptinus (Cyphoderes) sp. male: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133597&st=21600&p=1480651#entry1480651
Well, I say .... I'm in plain text seems to be written - I do not need to say anything, everything has long been discussed, what once again from an empty but in a net. Crooked legislation in this case (as well as in all) ((( Firstly, it is in this case curved. In the repeat, in all its curves, too, can not be named. Do not simplify. From an ethical point of view, it will look ugly in ...
There is a bug now that the phot may be in a well-defined, but without reference to the form. That Alexander and rules. Although in your case, it is really best left as it is, to then quickly it all from admin to catch and send to the species.
Point may be. Regarding the right - I already explained everything in the phone and TZ the legislation of the Russian Federation, and with TZ concepts. In such cases we must first seek the consent. Who is interested in the rights of authors in the photo as part of this site - all issues to me. And share this photo is not going purely for technical reasons.
Basil, change the terminology - it is a short (if they take me). But then affix angles to pile on truck - is longer. So that puts immediately and replace the terms, do not worry. As for the instance of the entomological collection - in four words of this length, kanesh can be anything you want to record. Brevity is necessary to indicate brevity.
Now instead of "tracks" everywhere should be spelled "larva" (Change). If there is still overlooked for this case - reported.
Maybe it has to move, just one more opinion for? In extreme cases, it will be possible to deploy. Even now it is not hanging in uncertain.
Throw me in the system area examples in Europe and see what went wrong. Maybe, again, like the last time on a smaller scale (most taxa were incorrectly removed in compiling the information from various sources, than they did not exist).
Oh, where to take the "American taxa set" ... overseas brothers immediately popribavilos site would ...
I'm not about that. I say, why Hybomitra write in the comments, not wilted him Fautua at startup or through LC?
Instead of "a new classification of" propose to say so: 1. The classification used on the site 2. Information identifying the source. Otherwise, someone will understand what, in general, we are, and someone will take it in the world there is a certain sacred "new" classification and some "old".