Pages: 1 ...28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36... 144
The definition should be at least until something to the same division in the galleries and communities do. But there is an alternative. And if dipterologi will not catch up, then what for the site need from Diptera then?) And if they stay within bezvylazno molbiola and determine on the engine, forum, and all will be "as usual".
Yes, everything is going in the same gallery. But the ability to do the selection in the gallery of the taxon. So loading slowly, all the rules, you can continue in the same spirit.
Funeta infa was not eve the first source of information for the website. However it works as one of the sources. There will be large update when we move to insecta.pro.
Leon, I think here it is: like this brainless butterfly focuses on the world map? Where it is hidden navigator? Who commands them? Who shows them the way ?? Who are coded chips that were transferred to the microdroplets from father to son? coupled with the casual attitude to spelling - is a sign of yellowing.And that's about it: nonsense Wallace and Darwin well that was ...
Yellowness - from the tabloids. Pop nonsense - we're trying to connect online scholarly and popular, but there are close to skirting the boundaries of this "popular", behind which begins the flow of information, such as meaningful as nonsense.As published by the facts and the manner of their presentation (including, by the way, and spelling) visitors judged on its contents and with more or less ...
About yellowness - I do not color on the picture meant. About the data - no, not better, if he will select a moderator. More specifically, it will select, but initially not information should be published on page pictures, and on page form simply because it belongs to the species rather than the picture.At the same time, any user can publish two types: Those that belong to some sections of the ...
Yellowness leave aside, but that's about the place of supply of information, Leon once again that information on the form, not of a particular fote / individuals on it, we publish page type , but not on the page foty.
Instead, the line should just note the size in the comment to the photo. It will not disfigure Fautua and thus serve as a more accurate data.
Irina, I remind you that if you can not nonche determination to species makes sense to put a definition to superspecies taxon (foty to knit these taxa).
Fedor, no problems with the transfer to ext. No gallery. Let's act on the reverse side: if there are questions / objections to the transfer has already taken place concrete pictures (and not necessarily their own), we write in the comments to them.
While in the specification or in the comments to the photos would prescribe that the hybrid, and when that section or under them have guessed, you can quickly find all foty and transfer section.
Now foty all reduced to a size to fit into a rectangle 1280x768 pixels. With a decrease in image quality may be slightly reduced because program on the website pictures shakes worse than, for example, Photoshop. If you want that Fota did not change their size - will ship it directly to the amount specified above. Iemake it fit into a rectangle the size of 1280x768 (W x H).
Leon, the Old ask about adding a page of the form (there special link available) rather than pictures on the page.
No, this is not a technical glitch. INFA of subtypes we currently displayed in the pages of the relevant species and to link. And what of information that can be a little - so even for species not all descriptions are available.
Shamil, you can not just straight right now (with the launch of a small rocky obstructions insects). If in a few days I will not do - remind.