E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36... 144

08.09.2015 22:29, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42786

The definition should be at least until something to the same division in the galleries and communities do. But there is an alternative. And if dipterologi will not catch up, then what for the site need from Diptera then?) And if they stay within bezvylazno molbiola and determine on the engine, forum, and all will be "as usual".

08.09.2015 22:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42786

Basil, and you're all going to molbiol, look, there will be even more dipterologov.

08.09.2015 21:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42786

Funny thing.

08.09.2015 11:51, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42723

Very well. Immediately and confirmed.

08.09.2015 11:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42718

Yes, everything is going in the same gallery. But the ability to do the selection in the gallery of the taxon. So loading slowly, all the rules, you can continue in the same spirit.

05.09.2015 0:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42643

Please, give the reference.

04.09.2015 19:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6334

Funeta infa was not eve the first source of information for the website. However it works as one of the sources. There will be large update when we move to insecta.pro.

03.09.2015 22:46, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42608

Basil, it will be fixed on Insecta.pro.

03.09.2015 21:16, Peter Khramov: comment on Tolype

Not now, in the future, I think the opportunity is embedded.

30.08.2015 23:47, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42484

Leon, I think here it is: like this brainless butterfly focuses on the world map? Where it is hidden navigator? Who commands them? Who shows them the way ?? Who are coded chips that were transferred to the microdroplets from father to son? coupled with the casual attitude to spelling - is a sign of yellowing.And that's about it: nonsense Wallace and Darwin well that was ...

30.08.2015 23:42, Peter Khramov: comment on Triphysa nervosa

I look in the framework of the insects now finish line went.

30.08.2015 15:57, Peter Khramov: comment on Ypsolopha amoenella

Asus, only Asus!

30.08.2015 1:43, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42489

Corrected data. → Paradysstroma corussaria.

30.08.2015 1:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42484

Yellowness - from the tabloids. Pop nonsense - we're trying to connect online scholarly and popular, but there are close to skirting the boundaries of this "popular", behind which begins the flow of information, such as meaningful as nonsense.As published by the facts and the manner of their presentation (including, by the way, and spelling) visitors judged on its contents and with more or less ...

30.08.2015 1:22, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42467

Yuri keep calm, everything is okay.

30.08.2015 1:22, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42467

Corrected data. Not identified → Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.08.2015 15:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42484

About yellowness - I do not color on the picture meant. About the data - no, not better, if he will select a moderator. More specifically, it will select, but initially not information should be published on page pictures, and on page form simply because it belongs to the species rather than the picture.At the same time, any user can publish two types: Those that belong to some sections of the ...

29.08.2015 1:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42484

Yellowness leave aside, but that's about the place of supply of information, Leon once again that information on the form, not of a particular fote / individuals on it, we publish page type , but not on the page foty.

28.08.2015 17:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42479

They are coming!

27.08.2015 22:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #38998

Why can not tolerate?

27.08.2015 17:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42462

Corrected data. Pieris brassicae brassicae → Pieris brassicae.

26.08.2015 16:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #41034

Instead, the line should just note the size in the comment to the photo. It will not disfigure Fautua and thus serve as a more accurate data.

25.08.2015 23:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #37788

Ok, removed.

25.08.2015 22:45, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #37788

?

25.08.2015 20:02, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42392

Irina, I remind you that if you can not nonche determination to species makes sense to put a definition to superspecies taxon (foty to knit these taxa).

25.08.2015 14:35, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42373

Fedor, no problems with the transfer to ext. No gallery. Let's act on the reverse side: if there are questions / objections to the transfer has already taken place concrete pictures (and not necessarily their own), we write in the comments to them.

25.08.2015 3:01, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42373

Why would it something extra ...

25.08.2015 1:03, Peter Khramov: comment on Brachylomia viminalis

Ugums ready.

24.08.2015 2:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #41107

While in the specification or in the comments to the photos would prescribe that the hybrid, and when that section or under them have guessed, you can quickly find all foty and transfer section.

23.08.2015 23:44, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42351

Fixed for this and other photos where mogul appear the same problem.

23.08.2015 23:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3018

With fotami corrected, now displays all the rules. As for the anchor links - I understand you.

23.08.2015 23:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42330

Now foty all reduced to a size to fit into a rectangle 1280x768 pixels. With a decrease in image quality may be slightly reduced because program on the website pictures shakes worse than, for example, Photoshop. If you want that Fota did not change their size - will ship it directly to the amount specified above. Iemake it fit into a rectangle the size of 1280x768 (W x H).

23.08.2015 23:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #42333

Leon, the Old ask about adding a page of the form (there special link available) rather than pictures on the page.

23.08.2015 23:00, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3018

No, this is not a technical glitch. INFA of subtypes we currently displayed in the pages of the relevant species and to link. And what of information that can be a little - so even for species not all descriptions are available.

23.08.2015 19:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3018

Alexander, it seems to me that we are conducting "talk about anything". Bull's-eye.

20.08.2015 22:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #41182

Shamil, you can not just straight right now (with the launch of a small rocky obstructions insects). If in a few days I will not do - remind.

20.08.2015 11:21, Peter Khramov: comment on Araschnia levana

That tree taxa general form appeared - my oversight. Now they are removed from there. And, of course, no bindings fot the forms should not be only to taxa. He returned the pictures back. The forms are recorded only in the specification for photos or comments to her.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31693

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2911

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31667

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31666

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31665

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31664

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #29397

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #33146

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31695

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31694

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31668

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3942

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31488

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. prorsa → Araschnia levana.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.