Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536... 629

22.01.2013 23:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20208

Thanks, moved.

22.01.2013 23:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20220

Goes to.

22.01.2013 21:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20161

Beauty.

22.01.2013 15:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20178

Goes to.

22.01.2013 15:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20182

Moved.

21.01.2013 12:39, Fornax13: comment on Genus Philonthus - another typo?

I've seen such asymmetric instances before.And you can, if it is not difficult, post scans of these tables in the section "Scans of books with entomological topics". Quaffe has already been posted there.http://156.17.59.206/KLUCZE%20DO%20OZNACZA...111_XIX_24e.pdf

20.01.2013 19:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6954

Moved.

20.01.2013 19:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #14612

Goes to E. poulardi "uncertain". More opinions welcome.

20.01.2013 19:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #15535

Moved to "uncertain" so far. Anybody anything to say?

20.01.2013 16:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #19994

Corrected.

20.01.2013 16:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #19942

Goes to.

20.01.2013 16:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #19941

Thanks, moved.

20.01.2013 16:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18566

Goes to.

20.01.2013 16:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18565

Moved.

20.01.2013 16:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18306

Goes to.

20.01.2013 16:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20059

Moved. Or to "uncertain"?

20.01.2013 16:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20076

Moved from E. tundrana to "undetermined".

20.01.2013 16:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6119

Goes to.

20.01.2013 16:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6120

Moved from E. venustula.

20.01.2013 16:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #19989

Moved from A. betulana.

20.01.2013 16:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18569

Thanks, moved.

20.01.2013 16:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6248

And no any angles more...

20.01.2013 16:23, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20130

Moved.

20.01.2013 16:23, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20107

Moved.

20.01.2013 16:22, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6357

Goes to.

20.01.2013 16:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20126

Moved.

20.01.2013 14:23, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6150

Moved to H. salicella. The photo was uploaded 2 years ago, so now we can barely get to know if he actually had some trouble with upload back then.

20.01.2013 14:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20136

Goes to.

20.01.2013 10:32, Yakovlev: comment on Business trips and conferences

In fact, everything was not so tough, but absolutely normal and questions were asked - especially in the sections it was very inetersno

19.01.2013 14:44, Lev Bely: comment on Butterflies and music: Reveille / Butterfly Convict

Rap metal was born in the late 1980s when rappers and metal fans were still violently fighting head-to-head. Music however leaves no place for limits and fights, so today those who love rap metal have a whole range of bands to enjoy, say, Reveille from Massachusetts, which despite sadly broke up in 2003 still released a couple of albums. The debut one, Laced (1999), opens with the ...

18.01.2013 21:37, chebur: comment on The question of Noctuidae

According to my observations, the most secretive scooper is Parascotia fuliginaria. All the time it tries to hide in some crevice or crawl away into the shade, sits down on the border of the illuminated area and is quite shy. But I've never had any problems with Trachea atriplicis. Always sits down in plain sight, behaves in my opinion not at all timid. One of the most common scoops.

18.01.2013 15:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #19951

Goes to.

18.01.2013 15:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #19943

Moved.

18.01.2013 15:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #1743

Replaced with a new file.

18.01.2013 13:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6035

Removed another one.

18.01.2013 12:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #19950

Moved.

16.01.2013 22:12, Lev Bely: comment on photo #18340

Polyommatus something...:) Anyway thanks.

16.01.2013 22:07, macrothorax: comment on Morphocarabus monilis rothi!

retrograde is in the monilis plan.And it's not very similar to rothi either. Probably some transitional form of the type hampei n. telekii Csiki, 1937. (rather large primary fossae)kollari Palliardi, 1825-I don't rule it out either. These Morphocarabus may have such a deceptive appearance. with the French is all "monilis"......

16.01.2013 21:48, Pavel Morozov: comment on Notodonta torva and Notodonta ziczac

Here, links to lepiforum.dehttp://lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Notodonta_Ziczachttp://lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Notodonta_TorvaThe zigzag track is seen as variable and with a more contrasting pattern. The zigzag has a clearer longitudinal stripe on its side.This post was edited by Morozzz - 16.01.2013 21: 54

16.01.2013 20:54, AGG: comment on Cholevidae

I don't own Photoshop, for sure a skilled person will pull out much more, but lighter seems to look better?

16.01.2013 19:35, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #11077

Goes to.

16.01.2013 19:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #17247

Moved.

16.01.2013 19:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18524

Thanks, moved.

16.01.2013 19:28, vasiliy-feoktistov: comment on Young Fighter Course

Specially filled in once again the book "Your Collection" by Kozlov and Ninburg.Like many people, I once started with it.Denis, I recommend downloading and reading it: http://rghost.ru/43081490This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 16.01.2013 19: 33

16.01.2013 16:07, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7435

By the way, it's done, two years haven't passed.

16.01.2013 15:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18590

The author identified it right, just didn't manage to link the photo with the ID properly. Just fixed it. Vitaly, such mislinking happens due to you incorrectly write the species name like c album without hyphen whilst the catalogue name actually has hyphen (c-album).

15.01.2013 22:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18593

Would like to say it again, it's never bad to confirm the ID. It's not about that the one who identified would have no doubt, but lest other people have any, since those might know nothing of the species, if it's common or not, neither know anything at all.

15.01.2013 22:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18581

To Vitaly and all photographers as well, please let's not add dry specimens two things at once in one photo. This way (easier to compare) is good for guides and home archives, while the photos on the website can be used and selected in many ways, and it's just two clicks for to have two separate pics before the eyes, instead such double photos make the search quite more complicated. So if any of ...