Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406... 628

05.10.2014 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13809

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13651

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9467

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9011

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7430

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6400

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3756

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3718

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3709

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2371

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9012

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26828

I put in males. A fragment of a wing belongs to the male.

05.10.2014 7:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13275

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14382

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22019

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 6:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22949

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

05.10.2014 6:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27911

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 6:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27919

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 6:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22020

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 1:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33938

I did not dare to put it in the exact ...... And for obvious reasons :) I will ask to confirm or deny.

05.10.2014 1:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33916

Shamil, it is the only one in the family. Therefore, you can immediately into accurate :)

05.10.2014 1:17, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #28025

Peter, you need to divide this group of 5 photos of 4 different species

05.10.2014 0:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9468

I afford to clarify the geography of the picture. It would be superfluous in this case. Moscow is a metropolis, one of the largest in the world :)

05.10.2014 0:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7758

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 0:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7754

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 0:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5796

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 0:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3769

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 0:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3768

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 0:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2369

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

04.10.2014 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33933

Well, that's the Vladimir region on the geography of the form to help :)

04.10.2014 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3606

UPD. Done. At the same time span and formalized.

04.10.2014 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Apatura ilia

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 55—70 mm.

04.10.2014 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Apatura iris

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 60—70 mm.

04.10.2014 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33927

I uploaded underside and replaced the top: work on the bugs. Good to have a collection that is going to for decades. You can always find the right instance. It is already 18 years passed. Butterflies in nature so do not live :)

04.10.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33925

Upload a photo underside and changed over.

04.10.2014 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33070

Corrected data. Lacanobia thalassina / Tentatively identified → Xestia c-nigrum / Confidently identified.

04.10.2014 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33068

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

04.10.2014 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33067

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

04.10.2014 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10366

From related speciesApatura irisunderside differs in the following features: "The underside of the rear wings are brownish with a violet hue, purple sash dirty". Verbatim quote from here: BM Mamaev LN Medvedev FN Pravdin "to the insects of the European part of the USSR" Moscow, "Education" 1976

04.10.2014 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10365

From related speciesApatura irismajor differences on top of the following: "Grasp the rear wings slightly curved, with no angular projection". Verbatim quote from here: BM Mamaev LN Medvedev FN Pravdin "to the insects of the European part of the USSR" Moscow, "Education" 1976

04.10.2014 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33912

From related speciesApatura iliaunderside differs in the following features: "The underside of the rear wings reddish-brown with purple tint and white band" Verbatim quote from here: BM Mamaev LN Medvedev FN Pravdin "to the insects of the European part of the USSR" Moscow, "Education" 1976

04.10.2014 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2471

Well, I'll write with a capital letter, if it is the main theme of the site. Unless the name is not on the beginning of a sentence :) I think this option will suit all. For Fedor Ovechkin: under the "Butterfly is not a thing" I mean once again the name of the species.As, however, and people too, not a thing, and From Biological species of animal and should also be written with a capital letter: ...

04.10.2014 12:38, Peter Khramov: comment on Grammodes stolida

Combined.

03.10.2014 11:15, Бомка: comment on Taxonomy of the genus Carabus L., 1758

. Carabus (Morphocarabus) mestscheryakovi ssp. irkoutskensis Lapouge, 1915An obvious error.It is a subspecies of C. odoratus.You should have both mestscherjakovi and odoratus there.This post was edited by Bomka - 03.10.2014 11: 21

02.10.2014 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33838

But the quality of the butterfly wants the best :( The defect at the exit from the pupae.

02.10.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #1084

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

02.10.2014 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22814

I remember it took arms, as with anything there was no goal was not to catch butterflies ..... And now look: flies such "black sheep" among ordinary males over korostavnieom. I could not miss the moment and took his fingers, and then carried home in a cigarette pack. Since this unusual pafiyu not met even once (Nostalgia ....