Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366... 627

25.02.2015 8:40, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #38960

ATP)

25.02.2015 8:12, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #31190

Corrected data. Not identified → Celastrina argiolus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.02.2015 8:08, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39217

Corrected data. Not identified → Japonica lutea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.02.2015 8:07, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39218

Corrected data. Not identified → Japonica adusta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.02.2015 8:06, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39216

Corrected data. Petr Khramov → Irina Nikulina.

25.02.2015 8:06, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39215

Corrected data. Not identified → Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.02.2015 21:46, Peter Khramov: comment on Bugs with the addition of new comments

:--))

22.02.2015 20:48, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39150

Nicholas, you have to catch a wave, you've become everything to go well, and photographing straightened copies. and cropping, straightening left behind, do not rush, because then one would have to ask Peter to replace other photo, it is better to do well. :)))

22.02.2015 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39152

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Chazara persephone / Confidently identified / Male / Alexander Belousov.

22.02.2015 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39151

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Chazara persephone / Confidently identified / Male / Alexander Belousov.

22.02.2015 19:22, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39149

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Chazara briseis / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.

22.02.2015 18:48, Alex Dumchus: comment on Chilasa

And what no one will make the subgenus types ??? I would have made, but I'm not allowed.

22.02.2015 17:21, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #39147

ATP for subspecies)

21.02.2015 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39148

Corrected data. Not identified → Chazara briseis / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

20.02.2015 19:37, scarit: comment on Ground beetles of the tribe Harpalini

Harpalus modestus Dejean, 1829 Kemerovo region, Kuznetsk basin, Karakansky cr. near the village.Permyaki, lugovaya steppe, 1.06.2013, D. Efimov leg.Photo: D. V. Sushchev Pictures:SAM_1057.JPG — (312.44к)

20.02.2015 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39114

Corrected data. Not identified → Polyura narcaeus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

20.02.2015 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39113

Corrected data. Not identified → Polyura narcaeus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

20.02.2015 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39122

Corrected data.

20.02.2015 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39121

Corrected data.

20.02.2015 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39086

Corrected data. Not identified → Macroglossum mitchelli / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.02.2015 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39085

Corrected data. Not identified → Macroglossum mitchelli / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.02.2015 9:03, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #39100

Copy of http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/31220

20.02.2015 9:01, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #31221

Not doglyadel. Copy. I offer this option to remove the underside (replaced by http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/39099.,-Он I like.

20.02.2015 6:11, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39095

Corrected data. Not identified → Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.02.2015 6:09, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39097

Corrected data. Not identified → Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.02.2015 6:08, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39098

Corrected data. Not identified → Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.02.2015 6:07, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39096

Corrected data. Not identified → Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.02.2015 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33541

Corrected data. Not identified → Tiracola aureata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.02.2015 20:01, Svetlana Shchavelina: comment on photo #30358

Same as # 30345?

18.02.2015 17:53, okoem: comment on Heliothinae scoops? Heliothini tribe

Schinia cognata (Freyer, [1833])Butterfly on a forage plant (Chondrilla juncea). Photos in nature.July 22, 2014. Crimea, surroundings of the Old Crimea, foot of Maly Agarmysh mountain, rocky steppe area.

18.02.2015 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39045

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Appias olferna / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2015 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39044

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Appias olferna / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2015 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39074

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

18.02.2015 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39067

Corrected data. Not identified → Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2015 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39066

Corrected data. Not identified → Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2015 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39065

Corrected data. Not identified → Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2015 12:21, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39063

Corrected data. Not identified → Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2015 12:21, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39064

Corrected data. Not identified → Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.02.2015 17:46, Alex Dumchus: comment on photo #39058

I gave this image, due to the bright yellow inserts on the rear wing, which is not very typical for the Papilio helenus (usually white or light yellow)

17.02.2015 11:01, Bianor: comment on Defining features for distinguishing closely related butterfly species

Comparison of E. tristata and E. hastulata:From here:http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Epirrhoe_Tristata

16.02.2015 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39049

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

16.02.2015 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39048

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

16.02.2015 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39039

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Ixias pyrene / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

16.02.2015 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39038

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Ixias pyrene / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

16.02.2015 19:49, Alex Dumchus: comment on photo #39040

I kazhetsya- it, Basil. On the black somehow turns gloomy, look my previous shot Cyrestis sp- 39005. I will not black! We have Belousov, who turns and black on black, and I believe that life should be more light and bright colors ..

16.02.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39041

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

16.02.2015 13:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39034

Yes, the view is not very. It's hard, two completely white butterflies from different semeyst (subfamilies) identify one photo. :) In the butterfly, nobody, even the issue, one or another form, there would be, and photo ??? :))