Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585... 629

02.03.2011 15:02, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6967

Moved to E. penelope.

02.03.2011 15:02, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6946

Goes to.

02.03.2011 15:02, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6904

To go.

02.03.2011 14:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7144

Moved/activated.

02.03.2011 14:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6223

Moved to A. albicans.

02.03.2011 14:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #1539

Guys, who commented this photo?

02.03.2011 12:19, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7114

Syngamia florella (Stoll, 1781).

02.03.2011 11:09, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #2044

This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 11:07, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #5455

This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 11:07, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #5454

This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 11:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #5453

This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 10:59, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #2041

This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 10:58, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4164

This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 10:19, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6069

Dmitry! I've got it in a tightly closed box, lazy to open. Shot that about five years ago (even rather scanned).

02.03.2011 2:01, Peter Khramov: comment on Once again about Guyana

Constantine sent one hundred and fifty new images; -)

01.03.2011 22:41, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5978

Ok, moved.

01.03.2011 22:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6071

This one also went to males.

01.03.2011 22:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6067

Ok, male is male.

01.03.2011 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #6066

This species is identified correctly.

28.02.2011 20:09, palvasru4ko: comment on The most famous entomologist

No, well, what is not an entomologist (in the eyes of the masses)? Photos from here - Durimar statue in Kiev Zoo as for me, it looks like L. A. Shelyuzhko(left) and Y. P. Nekrutenko (right): This post was edited by palvasru4ko - 02/28/2011 20: 17

28.02.2011 19:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5476

Good. Moved.

28.02.2011 11:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6618

To "uncertain".

28.02.2011 11:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6615

Ok then, moved.

28.02.2011 10:03, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5819

Well, let it be like this then. As for differences between claudina subspecies and also other species, I fully agree.

28.02.2011 1:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6895

To go.

28.02.2011 1:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6897

Moved.

28.02.2011 1:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6898

Moved.

28.02.2011 1:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6617

Moved.

27.02.2011 23:17, Peter Khramov: comment on Photos Davkaeva Eugene and Eugene Komarov

Including with no specific butterflies.

26.02.2011 22:41, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6222

Thanks, moved.

26.02.2011 19:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5630

Thanks for the tip. Corrected.

26.02.2011 18:17, vespa crabro: comment on Wasps

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=maculi.../88/JpgfFDxxbp0

26.02.2011 13:00, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6022

Moved.

25.02.2011 21:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6021

Shot moved.

25.02.2011 18:14, Peter Khramov: comment on Tormozizm ...

Ok, thank you, will ask if there are difficulties.

25.02.2011 16:54, Peter Khramov: comment on 200 photos Vitaly Gumenyuk

New arrivals in the gallery.

25.02.2011 15:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3353

To go.

25.02.2011 13:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6391

Thanks, moved.

24.02.2011 21:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2877

Ok then, moved.

24.02.2011 20:57, barko: comment on Striped moths (Thyrididae)

Thyris kasachstanica Zagulajev, 1987 Kazakhstan, July

24.02.2011 15:00, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6377

Evgeny Karolinsky's comment is moved from the species photo page to the description one. I'd like to pay attention once more to that: on the species photo page you may discuss the very shot, is it good or not, what species is on it. But the species features, e. g. its taxonomic status, is possible to discuss only at the species description page. Also, being at the species photo page you can press ...

23.02.2011 16:40, Peter Khramov: comment on Sort by year in catalog

Vitali, the catalog - the types and in the gallery - photography. I think you are a little confusing variety of choice for both. Sort by year in the directory - sorting, the description of the type, for example, Linnaeus ... And for months - in the same directory have selected.Indication of hours and minutes (for the photo?) Optional, and giving - giving information about the time of the activity ...

23.02.2011 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #4672

This species is identified correctly.

23.02.2011 13:29, Peter Khramov: comment on Butterflies with the same set of colors

Vitali is not entirely true. In many species have brown / brown and gray. And nothing more. That's such - yes, a lot of options. In the first place they will have up to 25 kinds of crop. But the more complete set of colors and the unusual colors (eg, green), the better the system works.This, by itself, the color of it is not necessary to count on a sure sign to determine, but the help it can ...

23.02.2011 10:03, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4655

Questionable ssp. suellus, Staudinger, 1878: some authors move it to porcellus synonyms, others (e. g., Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia, 2008) consider it as a species itself. Also, the Catalogue says that suellus is expanded in Siberia (Baikal region), so it's a question who can be in Astrakhan region then.