Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7... 16
I do not know :) I have a tablet, I stuffed on it))) Sometimes I compare with the photos online, but here I am powerless ...
This photo and 52181, 52182 - identical, but species are different.
And all feed insects in all stages)
If the page does not do sub-species, the need to somehow make the caps so that they do not lead to an error page, but at least in appearance redirected. My question was this. Well, or not finding output subspecies.
Q: subspecies have their own page? Specifically, that this subspecies Pachnoda marginata peregrina Kolbe, 1906
I ask because when searching issued a link to a page (http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/978645), but the transition - a mistake ("Specify the taxon is not in the database of the site.")
Need to split group - #51009 and #51010
Just like pterophoridae looks =)
Eugene, flew to redefine the geography. Completely.
OK I understood. =)
Eugene! A predimagialnye stage can somehow identify? For example here is: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43152
Thanks in advance =)
Determining the type flied up for some reason ...
Good background =)
I think it's time to recall. Peter remind you! =)
Like ustakanilos with views, please move - Polydrusus tereticollis (De Geer, 1775)
http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1005923
What other semi-desert? .. I have mixed forest around there :)
and whom does he eat?
Here it is, my dear! This year did not see any ... =)
Yuri, what kind of structure of leaves?
Wow a green-eyed pussy :)
I forgot to add to the group. Correct =)
Link oddly is copied ...
Yes, it is necessary to leave inaccurately =) Because here the question bluntly: butterfly 38-40 mm.
So who knows what else, other than the size of A. livida different from A. tetra - tell us, we'll be very grateful)
Without underside would not venture to even guess who it is)
Here I think, can it makes sense to give the ability to upload point is determined from the list of sponsors of the site? .. Or can some =)
Ieh ... and how they define that? .. =)
This picture is good. More and hairs from this angle seen =)
According to the catalog, the species is not bearing the tag Coleoptera. There is only Cetoniidae.
And I do not say that they are. Just very similar "by analogy" =)
But why not a butterfly? You seem withdrawn Luehdorfia puziloi - very similar, but slightly different masonry substrate and the other =) Or you saw the tracks and are sure that this sawfly, for example?
Alex, the site is a functional association of pictures in a group, in a case where pictures illustrate the different perspectives of the same instance of a living organism. It is done through a personal account - "Edit".
It would be good to combine these two photos (top and underside of the wings).
And these gusyanok failed to withdraw? Or let grow? ..
There generally masonry Colorado reminds =)
Reminding the postponement of the form is or not? Cyphocleonus dealbatus is in the database =)
How do you like =)
As the discoverer of the information already looked? Where he found them.
to top ... and so likePlebejus argyrognomon
On top like shrimp =)
Caloptilia stigmatella?
Speaking of speaking names =)
http://jugan.org/perd.html
Both photos on the same page of the form.
Seems bug happened to be here ...
Clogmia albipunctata, Gunnar M Kvifte, diptera.info
Clogmia albipunctata, Gunnar M Kvifte, diptera.info
And that, apparently, the adult? .. Will practice spread)
As far as I understand, only the nymphs wear camouflage? ..
Somehow I registered on diptera.info Maybe there defined. With regard to size. On the same site is measured by the size of the calf, ie from head to tail, instead wingspan.
Vasily, thank you :) This case was in the garden, so it will probably re-encounter. For your reserve, I understand? =)
I, too, have been healthy. Maybe they "fade" and grow? =)
And a comma after the surname ran (it is unlikely pervonapisanie ... or not?)
Stephanocleonus ignobilis a synonym?
Next page