Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69... 80
Parent taxon has been changed. Harpalinae → Licininae.
Parent taxon has been changed. Harpalinae → Platyninae.
Parent taxon has been changed. Harpalinae → Lebiinae.
Parent taxon has been changed. Harpalinae → Pterostichinae.
Parent taxon has been changed. Harpalinae → Pterostichinae.
Parent taxon has been changed. Harpalinae → Pterostichinae.
Parent taxon has been changed. Harpalinae → Pterostichinae.
Corrected data. Abacetini Chaudoir, 1873 → Abacetini Chaudoir, 1872.
This double photo # 44080. Remove to. Somewhere formed :)
Agripnus murinus (Linnaeus, 1758).
Here another subspecies - ssp. melanota (Faldermann, 1837) (http://www.zin.ru/animalia/COLEOPTERA/rus/anadubmd.htm). My pictures of this particular subspecies, according to the points.
Currently, this genus is called Hirticollis Pic, 1894 (Dmitry Telnov. Nomenclatural notes on the Palaearctic Anthicidae (Coleoptera). Mitteilungen des Internationalen Entomologischen Vereins eV 12/2004; 29 (4): 109-173. )
Peter - are old pictures of kollektstsi initially small. Share in half - it is very small. Yet the hand reach, and find time to sit down for filming collectible copies - there are several thousand species of Coleoptera.
Reserves photo # 45065
Leptura (s.str.) quadrifasciata L., 1758
Mecynorhina harrisii (Westwood, 1847) - the author in parentheses, as This species in the genus Megalorrhina.
Eudicella hornimani Bates, 1877.
Slightly more laid correct, but too old soap box.
Now I know who to call, Irina! :)
Basil! This image somehow illustrates the page Byctiscus populi!
Basil! Well, you found the source :) It is true, of course, but Plavilshchikov old in my youth :)
It Byctiscus betulae (Linnaeus, 1758). Bottom have populi are no copper-red, and all other ...
This species is identified correctly.
These and other types of Scarabaeus can be one of the two - boeberi or transcaspicus. Size / quality of photos is not possible to determine to species, and given that one of the images that avtorp was specified instead of the Arkhangelsk region Astrakhan ie ... The geography is not working.
Yes, I understand, no doubt, by the definition of business, and that the photo is not suitable to illustrate the differences between closely related species! Himself realize that the last 3 photos Agapanthia in these photos are the same. Is there any reason? It is for points.
Basil! On Zinovsky site still picture Pseudadoretus phthisicus, made in Kazakhstan, accompanied by the comment "In Russia there is no", although the first was assembled by me, the commercials in 1980, and published information about it in 2002. Including If kind is in Iran, why would not he be in Azerbaijan :)
Basil, and that you yourself are fine photo Georgia? After all, at an altitude of 800 possible! What can we see? In this photo can not be distinguished from the kind of family!
Unfortunately, the images of this size can only determine the geography, alas. Igor and larger pictures can not we do?
Igor! Correct Arkhangelsk to Astrakhan!
The tribe belongs to the subfamily Dryptinae Bonelli, 1810.
Transfer to a subfamily Platyninae Bonelli, 1810.
The tribe refers to the absence in the database subfamily Pseudomorphinae Newman, 1842.
Move to the subfamily Lebiinae Bonelli, 1810.
Move to the subfamily Lebiinae Bonelli, 1810.
Move to the subfamily Panagaeinae Bonelli, 1810.
Move to the subfamily Licininae Bonelli, 1810.
Move to the subfamily Lebiinae Bonelli, 1810.
Move to the subfamily Pterostichinae Bonelli, 1810.
Move to the subfamily Licininae Bonelli, 1810
This tribe is a member of the subfamily Lebiinae Bonelli, 1810.
This tribe is no such a tribe. We've got subtribe Lachnophorina LeConte, 1853 in the tribe Odacanthini Laporte, 1834, which is a member of the subfamily Lebiinae Bonelli, 1810.
It refers to the absence in our database subfamily Anthiinae Bonelli, 1813. Plant and transfer.
In the subfamily Dryptinae Bonelli, 1810.
Move to the unfortunate "naked" subfamily Dryptinae Bonelli, 1810.
It's not a tribe, it's a Cratocerini Lacordaire, 1854 tribe's subtribe pertaining to the subfamily Pterostichinae Bonelli, 1810. Without podtiby can and do, but the tribe to have in place.
The tribe is a member of the subfamily Ctenodactylinae Castelnau, 1834. This subfamily is not in the database. We must start.
Transfer to a subfamily Licininae Bonelli, 1810.
Transfer to a subfamily Platyninae Bonelli, 1810!
This tribe is included in the subfamily Platyninae Bonelli, 1810!
This tribe is included in the subfamily Pterostichinae Bonelli, 1810!
News
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
- 25.08.2024: Further adaptation of the website for mobile devices
- 14.08.2024: Auto applying the properties "taxon", "author of identification", "precision of identification" to all photos in a group when one of the photos is changed
New photos (15.09.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 16:38, P. Khramov: Not identified → Doleschallia bisal...
- 16:38, P. Khramov: Not identified → Nymphalis canace /...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Maine needs butterfly surveyors
