Insecta.pro Community

29.01.2011 9:34, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4977

Saturniidae, Ceratocampinae, genus Adeloneivaia (Travassos, 1940), as for species, may be A. jason (Boisduval, 1872), just may be ...

29.01.2011 9:25, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4989

Rescintia hyppodamia, Cramer, 1777. Saturniidae, Arsenurinae.

29.01.2011 9:20, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4982

Seems to be one of Eacles imperialis subspecies, sooner cacicus (Boisduval, 1868). Saturniidae, Ceratocampinae subfamily.

27.01.2011 5:48, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4641

Chiasmia clathrata (=Semiothisa clathrata) (Linnaeus, 1758).

27.01.2011 5:42, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4627

Macroglossum stellatarum (Linnaeus, 1758).

26.01.2011 6:03, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Eilicrinia subcordaria

And here the most serious sites http://gni.globalnames.org/data_sources/2?page=48&search_term=ns%3AEIL* also cordaria. E. subcordiaria appears just on sites especially "popular";)

26.01.2011 5:52, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Eilicrinia subcordaria

The question remains open! Here - Product moths (Lepidoptera) of Russia. 2008. Ed. Sinev SY SPb.- M .: KMC. 424 pp., Yet E. subcordaria! Inclined to believe the printed word more. In an Internet just once sealed to the error went to "walk" across thousands of sites. But there are typos in books, alas. We must somehow specify.

25.01.2011 18:45, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Eilicrinia subcordaria

Peter! Himself reviewed - anywhere in the database. It is to me quite trustworthy person described in the label! Sorry!

24.01.2011 22:45, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Eilicrinia subcordaria

At the base of a typo in the title of the form. Right E. subcordaria (H.-S., 1852)

23.01.2011 10:36, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #2636

Wrong. This one is Scopula decorata.

23.01.2011 8:32, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Tyta luctuosa

Of course! What then Tyta! A T. luctuosa I just laid out in LC yesterday.

21.01.2011 22:39, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Papilio sataspes

Dmitriy! My apologies, but this is impossible. Just this copy. I went through a long time ago, and when was withdrawn (to be exact - scanned) only from above. Determination absolutely accurate.

19.01.2011 0:18, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4532

That's right! New Guinea should be kept, Papua removed. Wrote down just on autopilot. Also true for other Ornithoptera of the Arfak Mountains such as Ornithoptera rotschildi, arfakensis, goliath.

17.01.2011 19:19, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Trogonoptera brookiana

Dmitriy! He was already a thousand times here and there are riding! There is nothing to be done - "commercial" group :)

17.01.2011 18:56, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Trogonoptera brookiana

And on this site Ornitoptera sl More divided into several genera. Why it surprised me ptitsekrylok Association here in a heap!

17.01.2011 18:30, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Trogonoptera brookiana

With Ornithoptera I coped - added race and moved his sights from LK (a bunch of them out there). Peter! Trogonoptera you and transfer your T. urvillianus in Ornithoptera /

17.01.2011 17:52, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Ornithoptera priamus

Here I am about this! It is not too much should be right!

17.01.2011 13:38, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Ornithoptera priamus

The monographs are available to me for ptitsekrylkam genera Ornithoptera and Trogonoptera completely independent in the tribe. In an Internet edistvenny BM major source - funet. Most likely, and all references to Troides priamus (ie Ornithoptera = Troides) from there. Although I am not an expert on butterflies (TB tropics) and, possibly, someone serious tribe was revised. Just wanted to know who ...

17.01.2011 9:28, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Ornithoptera priamus

And when and by whom the genus Ornithoptera reduced to a synonym for Troides? That's something of a quite original views on the tribe Troidini!

17.01.2011 6:58, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4046

Camptogramma bilineata (Linnaeus 1758).

16.01.2011 17:16, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Zerynthia polyxena

In fact, in the south of European Russia banal species occurring in the mass throughout the locus kirkazona. The apparent rarity of this type may be associated with a fairly short time, the summer of adults (in the Volgograd region from mid-April to mid-May).

15.01.2011 13:22, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #3751

Look there, its absolute copy of http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/3797/! Local south dryas has somewhat different underside, that's why I didn't realize it first.

15.01.2011 8:36, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #3751

Dmitry, thumbs up. This one is 99% sure dryas!

14.01.2011 18:35, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #3590

Petr! There is no any additional subspecies info since no special form yet to put one. So as I can't see it at the very photo, I should every time click the image to go to the detailed info page. I tried to add it somehow uploading my last photos, but in the end can't see that at the photo page!

13.01.2011 14:08, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #2999

http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/3000/ is even less clear to identify! Angle sucks, but I have no other pics of this very butterfly. Let's delete it at all!

13.01.2011 11:38, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #2999

Now just rechecked that once more (digged through my archives) and.... was no reason to doubt. First identifying was right!