Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...74 75 76 77 78 79 80

05.02.2011 10:23, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5020

Dalceridae.

05.02.2011 10:22, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5019

Dalceridae.

05.02.2011 10:22, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5018

Dalceridae.

05.02.2011 10:22, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5017

Dalceridae.

04.02.2011 18:56, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5010

I'm also stuck, because of this simultaneousness, as there are Saturniidae as well as Saturnidae at the same time. Me and Vasily copypasted different references, so :). I vote for my version cause Latin species names usually have one "i" at the end if based on a male surname and two "i" if on a female one. But there always can be exceptions, so ... DON'T KNOW! I have two good references with one ...

04.02.2011 16:17, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5066

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 15:58, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5035

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 15:38, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5010

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 15:37, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4977

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 15:28, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4978

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 15:20, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4996

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 15:19, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5042

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 14:52, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4993

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 14:50, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5072

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 14:46, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4970

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 14:34, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4997

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 13:30, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5011

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 13:29, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5016

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 12:26, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5050

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 12:26, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5050

Idalus carinosa !!!

04.02.2011 9:47, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5007

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 8:33, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4981

This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 7:07, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4983

Automeris egeus (Cramer, 1775) as a version, of not so many though: http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Saturniidae/Hemileucinae/Automeris/Guy%2001306-s3.jpg (Automeris genus for sure!).

04.02.2011 6:34, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5049

This species is identified correctly.

03.02.2011 21:10, Evgeny Komarov: comment on

View transferred from generation to generation Conisania Luteohadena.

03.02.2011 16:21, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Ripponia hypolitus

View transferred from generation to generation Troides Ripponia.

03.02.2011 15:41, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Ornithoptera priamus

View transferred from generation to generation Troides Ornithoptera.

03.02.2011 15:30, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Trogonoptera brookiana

View transferred from generation to generation Troides Trogonoptera.

03.02.2011 11:45, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Atlantarctia tigrina

The range of species: North-West Italy, Southern France, the Pyrenees, Spain. By: VV Dubatolov. Database Dipper (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Arctiidae) of the Palearctic - http://www-sbras.nsc.ru/win/elbib/atlas/Arctiidae/138.html

03.02.2011 11:44, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Atlantarctia tigrina

View transferred from generation to generation Arctia Atlantarctia.

03.02.2011 10:02, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Epicallia villica

The range of species: Central and Southern Europe, South England, North-West Africa (Morocco, Tunisia), the European part of the USSR northward to Leningrad and Vyatka, south of Western Siberia (Kurgan), Crimea, the Caucasus, Transcaucasia, Turkey, the Middle East, Northwest and northern Iran, east to Shahkuha. By: V.V.Dubatolov - http://www-sbras.nsc.ru/win/elbib/atlas/Arctiidae/166.html

03.02.2011 9:59, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Epicallia villica

View transferred from generation to generation Arctia Epicallia.

02.02.2011 13:40, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Eucharia festiva

Comment on the Eucharia festiva species (removed from the base of 21.12.2013 23:44): View shifted from Arctia festiva to Eucharia festiva.

02.02.2011 13:37, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Eucharia festiva

Comment on the Eucharia festiva species (removed from the base of 21.12.2013 23:44): The range of species: Central and Southern Europe (except for the southern part of the Iberian Peninsula, western France, the North Sea and Baltic Sea, the Alps and the south of the Balkans), the European part of the USSR in the north to the south of Lithuania, Kaluga, Lower Kama; Crimea, the Caucasus, ...

01.02.2011 18:33, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5035

Syssphinx molina ♂, (Cramer,1780), Saturniidae.

01.02.2011 18:20, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5032

Automeris sp., Saturniidae.

01.02.2011 15:43, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5015

No doubts, I think! Male.

01.02.2011 14:26, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5077

This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 14:26, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5077

No doubts, this is true Letis herilia ♂, (Stoll, 1780). Noctuidae.

01.02.2011 14:21, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5062

This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 14:20, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5012

This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 14:20, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5002

This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 14:17, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5072

Approve Lophocampa maroniensis.

01.02.2011 14:03, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5028

Why version? Underside is ok!

01.02.2011 12:21, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5051

Looks alike.

01.02.2011 12:17, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5070

This one is even more similar to Antiblemma orbiculata than #5071.

01.02.2011 11:23, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5012

I think, that is Hemeroblemma opigena pandrosa ♂, (Cramer, 1776): http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Noctuidae/Guy%2000571-s3.jpg. Dmitry, seems you wanted to comment another shot, #5077?

01.02.2011 11:11, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5077

Noctuidae.

01.02.2011 11:10, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5062

Noctuidae.

01.02.2011 11:08, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5062

Hemeroblemma opigena pandrosa ♂, (Cramer, 1776).