Insecta.pro Community
Approve!
Letis ? herilia ♂, (Stoll, 1780).
Seems to be Synchlora gerularia, Hübner, [1823].
Approve Leuciris fimbriaria!
Approve Leuciris fimbriaria!
That's it, that's it!
Araeomolis rubens (Schaus, 1905), Arctiidae, Arctiinae.
Why not Idalus aleteria (Schaus, 1905)? Looks like its copy and so brand-new compared to this one of collection http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_01/texte/i_aleter.htm.
Yes, that's right! Using Opera also!
This one is for sure of the same crew as #5049! Guys! This is the very tropical South America! You are too picky to web databases and shots :)
Pressing "reload" and have comment added!
Eacles penelope (Cramer, 1775), imho.
Eacles penelope (Cramer, 1775), imho.
Also tend to think that's Epimolis incarnata male, but need to know how much it can vary. Doubtful to judge by just one item, even collected, as well as by photo...
Approve Letis. Just saw Ascalapha first ;). As for species, hm, hm, cause this crew has so volatile patterns...
Such angles are nothing but guesswork, you should know fauna to identify it.
Looks like Ascalapha odorata (Linnaeus, 1758) - http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Noctuidae/Guy%2002367-s3.jpg.
Rosema minor, Draudt, 1934. Vasily! Look at the color of the forewing spots and the shape of its apical parts. Dorsalis has black ones with concave apical parts.
Hm, if only Oxytenis mirabilis ♀, (Cramer,[1780]), and even this doesn't suit well. This our photo should be looked through in a large size, not this miniature.
Suggestion: Othorene hodeva ♂, (Druce, 1904), the same Ceratocampinae. http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Saturniidae/Ceratocampinae/Guy%2000686_mod-1-s3.jpg.
Then Paradaemonia samba (Schaus, 1906) only.
Worth checking it out, e. g. there: http://www.guianensis.fr/.
Vasily, absolutely right, first run! No other suggestions!
Saturniidae, Ceratocampinae. Something very close to genus Citheronia (W.Rothschild, 1907), or maybe that's the very it.
Saturniidae, Ceratocampinae. Something like Syssphinx (Hubner, 1819) - Rachesa (Michener, 1949).
Saturniidae, Arsenurinae, something close to Copaxa genus, Walker, 1855.
Saturniidae, Ceratocampinae, Eacles sp., looks like E. penelope (Cramer, 1775).
Saturniidae, Arsenurinae, Dysdaemonia genus (Hubner, 1819), species may be boreas, Cramer, 1775.
Saturniidae, Ceratocampinae, genus Adeloneivaia (Travassos, 1940), as for species, may be A. jason (Boisduval, 1872), just may be ...
Rescintia hyppodamia, Cramer, 1777. Saturniidae, Arsenurinae.
Seems to be one of Eacles imperialis subspecies, sooner cacicus (Boisduval, 1868). Saturniidae, Ceratocampinae subfamily.
Chiasmia clathrata (=Semiothisa clathrata) (Linnaeus, 1758).
Macroglossum stellatarum (Linnaeus, 1758).
And here the most serious sites http://gni.globalnames.org/data_sources/2?page=48&search_term=ns%3AEIL* also cordaria. E. subcordiaria appears just on sites especially "popular";)
The question remains open! Here - Product moths (Lepidoptera) of Russia. 2008. Ed. Sinev SY SPb.- M .: KMC. 424 pp., Yet E. subcordaria! Inclined to believe the printed word more. In an Internet just once sealed to the error went to "walk" across thousands of sites. But there are typos in books, alas. We must somehow specify.
Peter! Himself reviewed - anywhere in the database. It is to me quite trustworthy person described in the label! Sorry!
At the base of a typo in the title of the form. Right E. subcordaria (H.-S., 1852)
Wrong. This one is Scopula decorata.
Of course! What then Tyta! A T. luctuosa I just laid out in LC yesterday.
Dmitriy! My apologies, but this is impossible. Just this copy. I went through a long time ago, and when was withdrawn (to be exact - scanned) only from above. Determination absolutely accurate.
That's right! New Guinea should be kept, Papua removed. Wrote down just on autopilot. Also true for other Ornithoptera of the Arfak Mountains such as Ornithoptera rotschildi, arfakensis, goliath.
Dmitriy! He was already a thousand times here and there are riding! There is nothing to be done - "commercial" group :)
And on this site Ornitoptera sl More divided into several genera. Why it surprised me ptitsekrylok Association here in a heap!
With Ornithoptera I coped - added race and moved his sights from LK (a bunch of them out there). Peter! Trogonoptera you and transfer your T. urvillianus in Ornithoptera /
Here I am about this! It is not too much should be right!
The monographs are available to me for ptitsekrylkam genera Ornithoptera and Trogonoptera completely independent in the tribe. In an Internet edistvenny BM major source - funet. Most likely, and all references to Troides priamus (ie Ornithoptera = Troides) from there. Although I am not an expert on butterflies (TB tropics) and, possibly, someone serious tribe was revised. Just wanted to know who ...
And when and by whom the genus Ornithoptera reduced to a synonym for Troides? That's something of a quite original views on the tribe Troidini!
Camptogramma bilineata (Linnaeus 1758).
In fact, in the south of European Russia banal species occurring in the mass throughout the locus kirkazona. The apparent rarity of this type may be associated with a fairly short time, the summer of adults (in the Volgograd region from mid-April to mid-May).
Look there, its absolute copy of http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/3797/! Local south dryas has somewhat different underside, that's why I didn't realize it first.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (21.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 23:07, N. Pichugin: Всем доброго времени суток! Откликн...
- 21:35, A. M.: >21.11.2024 20:53, Влад Проклов >«...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- Butterflies and music: Paolo Zavallone & His Orchestra, Papillon Rouge
